Adapting a group-based, multimodal aphasia treatment for telehealth – co-design of M-MAT Tele

References

• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K. The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(3):211–218. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.508829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Wiggins R, Roy P, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2003;17(4):365–381. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(12):2188–2201.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJP, De Witte L, Wade DT, et al. A description of social participation in working-age persons with aphasia: a review of the literature. Aphasiology. 2010;22(10):1071–1091. doi: 10.1080/02687030701632179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Attard MC. M-MAT Procedure Manual [Manual]. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller F, Berthier ML. Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology. 2008;22(6):563–599. doi: 10.1080/02687030701612213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce JE, OHalloran R, Togher L, et al. Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of low-moderate intensity Constraint Induced Aphasia Therapy and Multi-Modality Aphasia Therapy in chronic aphasia after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023;31(1):44–56. doi: 10/gr559q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Nickels L, Copland D, et al. Results of the COMPARE randomised controlled trial of Constraint Induced or Multi-modality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia. J Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022;93(6):573–581. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page SJ, Wallace SE. Speech language pathologists’ opinions of constraint-induced language therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(4):332–338. doi: 10.1310/tsr2104-332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt R, Theodoros D, Hill AJ, et al. The development and feasibility of an online aphasia group intervention and networking program – TeleGAIN. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(1):23–36. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1369567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano F, Marangolo P. Editorial: new perspectives and methodologies in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of aphasia. Brain Sci. 2021;11(11):1508. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øra HP, Kirmess M, Brady MC, et al. The effect of augmented speech-language therapy delivered by telerehabilitation on poststroke aphasia—a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(3):369–381. doi: 10.1177/0269215519896616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knepley KD, Mao JZ, Wieczorek P, et al. Impact of telerehabilitation for stroke-related deficits. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(3):239–246. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciante L, Kiper P, Garzon M, et al. Telerehabilitation for people with aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Commun Disord. 2021;92:106111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teti S, Murray LL, Orange JB, et al. Telehealth assessments and interventions for individuals with poststroke aphasia: a scoping review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023;32(3):1360–1375. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wenke R, Lawrie M, Hobson T, et al. Feasibility and cost analysis of implementing high intensity aphasia clinics within a sub-acute setting. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(3):250–259. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.887777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI. Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 210. Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010). London (UK): British Standards Institution; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Spelter B, Corsten S, Diehlmann L, et al. The user-centred design in the development of a platform for teletherapy for people with aphasia. In: Antona M, Stephanidis C, editor. Universal access in human-computer interaction. Novel design approaches and technologies. Vol. 13308. Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 342–359. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05028-2_23.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong G, Burns CL, Dignam J, et al. Configuration of a telerehabilitation system to deliver a comprehensive aphasia therapy program via telerehabilitation (TeleCHAT): a human-centred design approach. Aphasiology. 2024;0(0):1–32. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2314328.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anemaat L. Using experience-based co-design to understand unmet needs and priorities across the continuum of care: a blueprint for aphasia service development [PhD thesis]. Brisbane: The University of Queensland; 2023. doi: 10.14264/795687c.
   Google Scholar
• Carminati J-YJ, Holth K, Ponsford JL, et al. Co-designing positive behaviour support (PBS + PLUS) training resources: a qualitative study of people with ABI, close-others, and clinicians’ experiences. Brain Impair. 2024;25(2):IB23060. doi: 10.1071/IB23060.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall J, Roper A, Galliers J, et al. Computer delivery of gesture therapy for people with severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;27(9):1128–1146. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2013.786803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuperus P, de Kok D, de Aguiar V, et al. Understanding user needs for digital aphasia therapy: experiences and preferences of speech and language therapists. Aphasiology. 2022;37(7):1016–1038. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2066622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales MA, Hill AJ, Finch E. Feature rich, but user-friendly: speech pathologists’ preferences for computer-based aphasia therapy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;18(4):315–328. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1081283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Preferred profile for hearing-aid technology suitable for low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/258721.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Lennon M, Cullen B, et al. Supporting people with acquired brain injury to use a reminding app; narrow-deep vs. broad-shallow user interfaces. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2022;15(1):1–23. doi: 10.1145/3501275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith F, Jackson C, Greenhalgh T. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louise L, Annette B. Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design. Evid Policy. 2019;15(3):409–421. doi: 10.1332/174426419X15552999451313.
   Google Scholar
• Centeno JG, Laures-Gore JS. Intersectionality in aphasia services for ethnosocially diverse adult populations. Semin Speech Lang. 2024;45(1):1–4. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mellahn K, Kilkenny M, Siyambalapitiya S, et al. Comparing acute hospital outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023;31(5):527–536. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2295128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Breslin HM. Refining an asynchronous telerehabilitation platform for speech-language pathology: engaging end-users in the process. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:640. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar