109
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Measuring the adoption of internet and communication technologies among practitioners in routine disability services: a stepped inclusive approach

Received 04 Oct 2023, Accepted 06 Jun 2024, Published online: 01 Jul 2024

References

  • Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, et al. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2791.
  • Sin J, Henderson C, Spain D, et al. eHealth interventions for family carers of people with long term illness: a promising approach? Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;60:109–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.01.008.
  • Chan C, Holosko MJ. A review of information and communication technology enhanced social work interventions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2016;26(1):88–100. doi: 10.1177/1049731515578884.
  • Warmerdam L, Riper H, Klein M, et al. Innovative ICT solutions to improve treatment outcomes for depression: the ICT4Depression project. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;181:339–343. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-339.
  • Adenuga OA, Kekwaletswe RM, Coleman A. eHealth integration and interoperability issues: towards a solution through enterprise architecture. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2015;3(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13755-015-0009-7.
  • Guaiana G, Mastrangelo J, Hendrikx S, et al. A systematic review of the use of telepsychiatry in depression. Community Ment Health J. 2020;57(1):93–100. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00724-2.
  • Niknejad N, Ismail W, Bahari M, et al. Understanding telerehabilitation technology to evaluate stakeholders’ adoption of telerehabilitation services: a systematic literature review and directions for further research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(7):1390–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.014.
  • Labrie D, Lapierre N, Mortenson WB, et al. Exploratory study on the adaptation of online services offered to people with disabilities, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024:1–11. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2326593.
  • Cheung DST, Or CK, So MKP, et al. The use of eHealth applications in Hong Kong: results of a random-digit dialing survey. J Med Syst. 2019;43(9):293. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1422-2.
  • Krausz M, Westenberg JN, Vigo D, et al. Emergency response to COVID-19 in Canada: platform development and implementation for eHealth in crisis management. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e18995. doi: 10.2196/18995.
  • Glueckauf RL, Maheu MM, Drude KP, et al. Survey of psychologists’ telebehavioral health practices: technology use, ethical issues, and training needs. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2018;49(3):205–219. doi: 10.1037/pro0000188.
  • Hennemann S, Beutel ME, Zwerenz R. Ready for eHealth? Health professionals’ acceptance and adoption of eHealth interventions in inpatient routine care. J Health Commun. 2017;22(3):274–284. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1284286.
  • Laver KE, Adey‐Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3.
  • Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, et al. Health care provider adoption of eHealth: systematic literature review. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2468.
  • Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, et al. Experiences of using the theoretical domains framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:139–146. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458.
  • Seebacher B, Bergmann E, Geimer C, et al. Factors influencing the willingness to adopt telerehabilitation among rehabilitation professionals in Austria and Germany: a survey comparing data before and during COVID-19. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;46(6):1149–1157. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2193428.
  • De Veirman AE, Thewissen V, Spruijt MG, et al. Factors associated with intention and use of e–mental health by mental health counselors in general practices: web-based survey. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(12):e34754. doi: 10.2196/34754.
  • Bachelor A. Clients’ and therapists’ views of the therapeutic alliance: similarities, differences and relationship to therapy outcome. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013;20(2):118–135. doi: 10.1002/cpp.792.
  • Ruskin PE, Silver-Aylaian M, Kling MA, et al. Treatment outcomes in depression: comparison of remote treatment through telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(8):1471–1476. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1471.
  • Mishna F, Sanders J, Fantus S, et al. # socialwork: informal use of information and communication technology in social work. Clin Soc Work J, 2019;49(1):85–99. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcab066.
  • Hong Kong SAR. LCQ15: strengthening epidemic prevention in residential care homes. www.info.gov.hk. [accessed 2024 Mar 21]. Available from: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202211/16/P2022111600240.htm?fontSize=1
  • Feijt M, de Kort Y, Westerink J, et al. Integrating technology in mental healthcare practice: a repeated cross-sectional survey study on professionals’ adoption of digital mental health before and during COVID-19. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:1040023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1040023.
  • van der Ham IJ, van der Vaart R, Miedema A, et al. Healthcare professionals’ acceptance of digital cognitive rehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2020;11:617886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617886.
  • Medina-García M, Higueras-Rodríguez L, García-Vita MDM, et al. ICT, disability, and motivation: validation of a measurement scale and consequence model for inclusive digital knowledge. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):6770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136770.
  • Bezuidenhout L, Joseph C, Thurston C, et al. Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: a survey of use and perceptions among physiotherapists treating people with neurological diseases or older adults. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07968-6.
  • Social Welfare Department. Notional staffing establishments; 2024 [accessed 2024 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/ngo/subventions/suballoc/subvention/nses/nses_rehs/index.html
  • Social Welfare Department. List of services; 2024 [accessed 2024 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/svcdesk/download/listofserv/
  • Feijt MA, De Kort YA, Westerink JH, et al. Assessing professionals’ adoption readiness for eMental health: development and validation of the eMental health adoption readiness scale. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e28518. doi: 10.2196/28518.
  • Nanda A, Ramesh DB. Assessment of information and communication technology (ICT) literacy among teachers and practitioners in the field of disability. Int J Inform Diss Technol. 2012;2(1):54.
  • Social Welfare Department. Case management service manual; 2024 [accessed 2024 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.swd.gov.hk/storage/asset/section/178/en/Case%20Management%20Service-RMB-31082016.pdf
  • Barendse MT, Oort FJ, Timmerman ME. Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Struct Equat Model. 2015;22(1):87–101. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.934850.
  • Schreiber JB. Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(5):1004–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027.
  • Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  • Bates RA. Multivariate research methods. In: Swanson RA, Holton EF, editors. Research in organizations: foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco (CA): Berrett Koehler Publications; 2005.
  • Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 2016.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1969.
  • Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575.
  • Social Welfare Department & Hospital Authority. Service framework of personalised care for adults with severe mental illness in Hong Kong; 2024 [accessed 2024 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.ha.org.hk/haho/ho/icp/ServiceFramework_Adults_with_SMI_ENG.pdf
  • Denicolai S, Previtali P. Innovation strategy and digital transformation execution in healthcare: the role of the general manager. Technovation. 2023;121:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102555.
  • Lal S, Adair CE. E-mental health: a rapid review of the literature. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(1):24–32. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300009.
  • Bäuerle A, Jahre L, Teufel M, et al. Evaluation of the E-mental health mindfulness-based and skills-based “CoPE It” intervention to reduce psychological distress in times of COVID-19: results of a bicentre longitudinal study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:768132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.768132.
  • Phillips EA, Gordeev VS, Schreyögg J. Effectiveness of occupational e-mental health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(6):560–576. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3839.
  • Hutton L, Price BA, Kelly R, et al. Assessing the privacy of mHealth apps for self-tracking: heuristic evaluation approach. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(10):e9217. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9217.
  • Paul C, Scheibe K, Nilakanta S. Privacy concerns regarding wearable IoT devices: how it is influenced by GDPR? Paper presented at the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Jan 7–10; Maui, HI, USA; 2020. Abstract available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286030593.pdf
  • Volpato L, del Río Carral M, Senn N, et al. General practitioners’ perceptions of the use of wearable electronic health monitoring devices: qualitative analysis of risks and benefits. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9(8):e23896. doi: 10.2196/23896.
  • Mather CA, Cheng C, Douglas T, et al. eHealth literacy of Australian undergraduate health profession students: a descriptive study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710751.
  • Zhao Y, Pinto Llorente AM, Sánchez Gómez MC, et al. The impact of gender and years of teaching experience on college teachers’ digital competence: an empirical study on teachers in Gansu agricultural university. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4163. doi: 10.3390/su13084163.
  • González MC, Martín SC. Social educators: a study of digital competence from a gender differences perspective. Croat J Educ. 2018;20(1):11–42. doi: 10.15516/cje.v20i1.2632.
  • Rettinger L, Klupper C, Werner F, et al. Changing attitudes towards teletherapy in Austrian therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(5):406–414. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20986038.
  • Montagni I, Cariou T, Feuillet T, et al. Exploring digital health use and opinions of university students: field survey study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(3):e9131. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9131.
  • Kraljević JK, Matić A, Dokoza KP. Telepractice as a reaction to the COVID-19 crisis: insights from Croatian SLP settings. Int J Telerehabil. 2020;12(2):93–104. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6325.
  • Sánchez Prieto J, Trujillo Torres JM, Gómez García M, et al. Gender and digital teaching competence in dual vocational education and training. Educ Sci. 2020;10(3):84. doi: 10.3390/educsci10030084.