Physical modelling of the seismic response of well casings in liquefiable soil

References

• Abdoun, T.H., et al., 2009. Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29 (3), 415–427. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Water Works Association, 1998. AWWA standard for water wells. Denver, Colo: The Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bahadori, H. and Farzalizadeh, R., 2018. Dynamic properties of saturated sands mixed with tyre powders and tyre shreds. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16 (4), 395–408. doi:10.1007/s40999-016-0136-9
   Google Scholar
• Bahadori, H., et al., 2018. A comparative study between gravel and rubber drainage columns for mitigation of liquefaction hazards. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (5), 924–934. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadori, H. and Manafi, S., 2015. Effect of tyre chips on dynamic properties of saturated sands. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 15 (3), 116–128. doi:10.1680/jphmg.13.00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayati, H. and Bagheripour, M.H., 2019. Shaking table study on liquefaction behaviour of different saturated sands reinforced by stone columns. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 37 (7), 801–815. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2018.1492051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglia, M., et al., 2021. Mitigation systems for the uplift of buried pipelines in liquefiable soils under repeated shaking through model tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 148, 106850. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., et al., 2018. Effects of layered liquefiable deposits on the seismic response of an underground structure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113, 124–135. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheuk, C.Y., et al., 2007. Soil restraint on buckling oil and gas pipelines buried in lumpy clay fill. Engineering Structures, 29 (6), 973–982. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chian, S.C., Tokimatsu, K., and Madabhushi, G., 2014. Soil liquefaction–induced uplift of underground structures: physical and numerical modeling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140 (10), 04014057. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y.H., et al., 2016. Seismic response of underground reservoir structures in sand: evaluation of class-c and c1 numerical simulations using centrifuge experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 85, 202–216. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobry, R., et al., 2019. Large-scale modeling of preshaking effect on liquefaction resistance, shear wave velocity, and CPT tip resistance of clean sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 145 (10), 04019065. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecemis, N., Valizadeh, H., and Karaman, M., 2021. Sand-granulated rubber mixture to prevent liquefaction-induced uplift of buried pipes: a shaking table study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19 (7), 2817–2838. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sekelly, W., et al., 2016. Centrifuge modeling of the effect of preshaking on the liquefaction resistance of silty sand deposits. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142 (6), 04016012. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakher, A., 2014. Research methods in geotechnics. 2nd ed. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, G., et al., 2016. Dynamic response and dynamic failure mode of a weak intercalated rock slope using a shaking table. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49 (8), 3243–3256. doi: 10.1007/s00603-016-0971-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzalizadeh, R., Hasheminezhad, A., and Bahadori, H., 2021. Shaking table tests on wall-type gravel and rubber drains as a liquefaction countermeasure in silty sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49 (6), 1483–1494. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., et al., 2015. Large-scale field trial to explore landslide and pipeline interaction. Soils and Foundations, 55 (6), 1466–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasheminezhad, A., et al., 2022. Seismic performance assessment of wall-type gravel and rubber drains in liquefaction mitigation of sands. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20 (8), 3699–3714. doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01358-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hushmand, A., et al., 2016. Seismic performance of underground reservoir structures: insight from centrifuge modeling on the influence of backfill soil type and geometry. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142 (11), 04016058. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, G.C., Tobita, T., and Iai, S., 2014. Seismic simulation of liquefaction-induced uplift behavior of a hollow cylinder structure buried in shallow ground. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 64, 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., 2001. Reducing liquefaction potential using dynamic compaction and construction of stone columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 19 (2), 169–182. doi:10.1023/A:1016672106067
   Google Scholar
• Kutanaei, S.S. and Choobbasti, A.J., 2015. Mesh-free modeling of liquefaction around a pipeline under the influence of trench layer. Acta Geotechnica, 10 (3), 343–355. doi:10.1007/s11440-015-0381-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutanaei, S.S. and Choobbasti, A.J., 2019. Prediction of liquefaction potential of sandy soil around a submarine pipeline under earthquake loading. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10 (2), 04019002. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutanaei, S.S., et al., 2022. Application of LRBF-DQ and CVBFEM methods for evaluating saturated sand liquefaction around buried pipeline. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 13 (1), 04021077. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, H.I., et al., 2003. Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129 (12), 1092–1101. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. and Song, E., 2005. Seismic response of large underground structures in liquefiable soils subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations. Computers and Geotechnics, 32 (4), 223–244. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., et al., 2015. Dynamic response of a geotechnical rigid model container with absorbing boundaries. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 69, 46–56. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manafi Khajeh Pasha, S., et al., 2018. Dynamic behaviour of saturated sandy soil reinforced with non-woven polypropylene fibre. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12 (1), 89–100. doi: 10.1080/19386362.2016.1250978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, S., et al., 2015. Cyclic deformation-strength evaluation of compacted volcanic soil subjected to freeze–thaw sequence. Soils and Foundations, 55 (1), 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohri, Y., et al., 2014. Damage to agricultural facilities. Soils and Foundations, 54 (4), 588–607. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadim, F., et al., 2004. The bam earthquake of 26 December 2003. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2 (2), 119–153. 26 December 2003. doi:10.1007/s10518-004-2286-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorzad, R. and Amini, P.F., 2014. Liquefaction resistance of Babolsar sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers under cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66, 281–292. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsubo, M., et al., 2016. Shaking table tests on liquefaction mitigation of embedded lifelines by backfilling with recycled materials. Soils and Foundations, 56 (3), 365–378. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, E., et al., 2021. Anti-liquefaction performance of partially saturated sand induced by biogas under high intensity vibration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128794. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcino, D.D., Tomasello, G., and Farzalizadeh, R., 2022. Pore-pressure generation of sands subjected to cyclic simple shear loading: an energy approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (PBD-IV 2022) Beijing, 1674–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, H.R., Hustrulid, W.A., and Stephenson, D.E., 1978. Earthquake damage to underground facilities. United States: Department of Energy, Savannah River Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Rostami, H., Osouli, A., and Kumar, S., 2023. Experimental modeling of far-field effects in buried pipelines subjected to reverse faulting. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 164, 107561. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedzadeh, R. and Hataf, N., 2011. Uplift response of buried pipelines in saturated sand deposit under earthquake loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31 (10), 1378–1384. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarokolayi, L.K., et al., 2016. Control-volume-based finite element modelling of liquefaction around a pipeline. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7 (4), 1287–1306. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2015.1060638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherard, J.L., Dunnigan, L.P., and Talbot, J.R., 1984. Basic properties of sand and gravel filters. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110 (6), 684–700. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:6(684)
   Google Scholar
• Shih, B.J. and Chang, C.H., 2006. Damage survey of water supply systems and fragility curve of PVC water pipelines in the Chi–Chi Taiwan earthquake. Natural Hazards, 37 (1), 71–85. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-4657-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L., et al., 2015. Responses of reinforced concrete pile group in two-layered liquefied soils: shake-table investigations. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 16 (2), 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towhata, I. 2008. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Towhata, I., et al., 2009. Model tests on behaviour of gravity-type quay walls subjected to strong shaking. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 42 (1), 47–56. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.42.1.47-56
   Google Scholar
• Uckan, E., 2012. Damage to industry and utilities during the October (Mw= 7.2) and November (M= 5.6), Van Lake earthquakes, Eastern Turkey. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 14403.
   Google Scholar
• Vazouras, P., Karamanos, S.A., and Dakoulas, P., 2010. Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30 (11), 1361–1376. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo, R. and Ishihara, K., 1996. The steady state of sandy soils. Soils and Foundations, 36 (2), 81–91. doi:10.3208/sandf.36.2_81
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., et al., 2016. Shaking table investigation on the seismic failure mode of PHC pipe-piles considering liquefaction. Geo-China, 2016, 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, K., et al., 2018. Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113, 180–192. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. and Kiku, H., 2006. Uplift of sewage manholes and pipes during the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu earthquake. Soils and Foundations, 46 (6), 885–894. doi:10.3208/sandf.46.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeghal, M. and Elgamal, A.W., 1994. Analysis of site liquefaction using earthquake records. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120 (6), 996–1017. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(996)
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, B. and Taucer, F., 2010. Performance of infrastructure during the May 12, 2008 wenchuan earthquake in China. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14 (4), 578–600. doi:10.1080/13632460903274053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar