Study of an innovative optimisation method for repair and renewal of production wells in the central section of the Mynkuduk field

References

• Alikulov, S.S. and Rabbimov, K.T., 2022. Research rational parameters of solutions during underground leaning of uranium. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4 (8), 4–19. doi:10.37547/tajas/Volume04Issue08-02.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J., et al. 2024. Economics of geotechnical asset deterioration, maintenance and renewal. Transportation Geotechnics, 45, 101185. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashena, R., et al. 2021. Improving drilling hydraulics estimations – a case study. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11 (6), 2763–2776. doi:10.1007/s13202-021-01203-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Z., et al. 2023. Optimisation of uranium–radium co-leaching from uranium ore. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 332 (6), 1841–1845. doi:10.1007/s10967-023-08892-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., et al. 2024. Improving the efficiency of in situ uranium leaching (remediation) with periodic injection and extraction: Insight from reactive transport modeling and field test. Journal of Hydrology, 630, 130767. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet, A., et al. 2022. Three-dimensional reactive transport simulation of Uranium in situ recovery: Large-scale well field applications in Shu Saryssu Bassin, Tortkuduk deposit (Kazakhstan). Hydrometallurgy, 211, 105873. doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelmayr, M.A., et al. 2018. Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 213, 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, S., et al. 2023. Efficient and clean release of uranium and zirconium in hazardous uranium purification waste by combined alkali decomposition and acid leaching process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11 (2), 109382. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.109382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagneau, V., Regnault, O., and Descostes, M., 2019. Industrial deployment of reactive transport simulation: An application to uranium in situ recovery. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 85 (1), 499–528. doi:10.2138/rmg.2019.85.16
   Google Scholar
• Li, G. and Yao, J., 2024. A review of in situ leaching (ISL) for uranium mining. Mining, 4 (1), 120–148. doi:10.3390/mining4010009
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., et al. 2023. A review of the metallogenic mechanisms of sandstone-type uranium deposits in hydrocarbon-bearing basins in China. Eng, 4 (2), 1723–1741. doi:10.3390/eng4020098
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. and Ott, W.K., 2020. Sodium silicate applications in oil, gas & geothermal well operations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195, 107693. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., et al. 2023. Study of natural attenuation after acid in situ leaching of uranium mines using isotope fractionation and geochemical data. Science of the Total Environment, 865, 161033. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., et al. 2021. Experimental research on the dynamic permeability of hydrate silty-clay reservoirs during water driven and exploitation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 94, 104071. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makowski, D., et al. 2020. Methods and algorithms for correlation analysis in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 5 (51), 2306. doi:10.21105/joss.02306
   Google Scholar
• Mukhamediev, R.I., et al. 2023. Determination of reservoir oxidation zone formation in uranium wells using ensemble machine learning methods. Mathematics, 11 (22), 4687. doi:10.3390/math11224687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radwan, H.A., et al. 2023. Optimization of the leaching process for uranium recovery and some associated valuable elements from low-grade uranium ore. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 103 (17), 5259–5281. doi:10.1080/03067319.2021.1936513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakishev, B., et al. 2020. Increasing of filtration characteristics of ore bodies in borehole uranium mining. In: E3S Web of Conferences, Dnipro, Ukraine. 00014.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, N., et al. 2020. Thermodynamic modeling of in situ leaching of sandstone-type uranium minerals. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 65 (4), 2017–2031. doi:10.1021/acs.jced.9b01152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.A., 2017. Monitoring and remediation wells: problem prevention, maintenance, and rehabilitation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suk, H., et al. 2021. Numerical evaluation of the performance of injection/extraction well pair operation strategies with temporally variable injection/pumping rates. Journal of Hydrology, 598, 126494. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ul-Hamid, A., 2020. Microstructure, properties and applications of Zr-carbide, Zr-nitride and Zr-carbonitride coatings: A review. Materials Advances, 1 (5), 1012–1037. doi:10.1039/D0MA00233J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., et al. 2023. Machine learning-based optimal design of the in-Situ Leaching Process Parameter (ISLPP) for the acid in-situ leaching of uranium. Journal of Hydrology, 626, 130234. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al. 2020. Research and application of wellbore fixed-point acidification unblocking technology for high temperature and high pressure gas wells. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference. 10.2523/IPTC-19736-Abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., et al. 2022. Advances and challenges in hydraulic fracturing of tight reservoirs: A critical review. Energy Geoscience, 3 (4), 427–435. doi:10.1016/j.engeos.2021.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z.H., et al. 2020. Types of uranium deposits in central Zhuguang Mountains in Hunan Province, South China and their metallogenic regularity and prospecting directions. China Geology, 3 (3), 411–424.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. 2022. Investigation of radioactivity of drilling mud for in situ leaching uranium mining in China. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4096715
   Google Scholar
• Zhi-Ming, D., Zheng-Bang, L., and Po, L. 2019. Application of wireless measurement while drilling technology in in-situ leaching uranium, Xinjiang, NW China. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering. https://avestia.com/MCM2019_Proceedings/files/paper/MMME/MMME_146.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., et al. 2023a. Simulation study on clogging of suspended particles in in-situ leaching of uranium at different concentrations and flow velocity. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 59 (2), 162150. doi:10.37190/ppmp/162150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., et al. 2023b. Study on the clogging of suspended particles with different particle sizes in porous media in in situ leaching of uranium. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 332 (10), 4243–4253. doi:10.1007/s10967-023-09112-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar