An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe?

References

• Aghion, P., H. Harmgart, and N. Weisshaar. 2011. “Fostering Growth in CEE Countries: A Country-tailored Approach to Growth Policy.” In Challenges for European Innovation Policy. Cohesion and Excellence from a Schumpeterian Perspective, edited by S. Radosevic and A. Kaderabkova, 47–76. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report, Prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., P. McCann, and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based Versus Place-neutral Approaches.” Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134–152.10.1111/jors.2012.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 407–443.10.2307/2937943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglof, E. 2015. “New Structural Economics Meets European Transition.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 18 (2): 114–130. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1013543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, M., and S. C. W. Eijffinger. 2005. “The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis for the EU-15 in 1995–2001.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 43: 37–51.10.1111/jcms.2005.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., and F. Canova. 2001. “Income Disparities and Regional Policies.” Economic Policy 32: 205–253.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39: 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A., F. Castellacci, J. Fagerberg, and B. Verspagen. 2003. “The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 41: 621–644.10.1111/jcms.2003.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., V. Lapuente, and L. Dijkstra. 2012. Regional Governance Matters: A Study on Regional Variation in Quality of Government within the EU. Working Paper 01/2012, European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., M. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria. 1998. “Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Environment and Planning A 30: 1563–1584.10.1068/a301563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’erba, S., and J. Le Gallo. 2008. “Regional Convergence and the Impact of European Structural Funds Over 1989–1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis.” Papers in Regional Science 87: 219–244.10.1111/pirs.2008.87.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., C. McLiesh, and R. M. Ramalho. 2006. “Regulation and Growth.” Economics Letters 92: 395–401.10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2002. “What We Should Know About Regional Systems of Innovation.” Technology in Society 24: 243–263.10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete. 1998. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., H. L. F. Groot, and R. Nahuis. 2006. “Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy.” Kyklos 59: 17–42.10.1111/kykl.2006.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen B., D. Park, and K. Shin. 2013. “Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-income Trap.” NBER Working Paper No. 18673.
   Google Scholar
• EIO. 2013. Europe in Transition: Paving The Way to A Green Economy Through Eco-innovation. Eco-Innovation Observatory. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels. http://www.eco-innovation.eu/images/stories/Reports/EIO_Annual_Report_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Esposti, R., and S. Bussoletti. 2008. “Impact of Objective 1 Funds on Regional Growth Convergence in the European Union: A Panel-data Approach.” Regional Studies 42: 159–173.10.1080/00343400601142753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations.” Research Policy 29: 109–123.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray D., and X. Goenega. 2013. The Goals of Smart Specialisation. S3 Policy Brief Series n° 01/2013–May 2013, S3 Platform. JRC-IPTS.
   Google Scholar
• Foster-McGregor N., M. Holzner, M. Landesmann, J. Pöschl, R. Stehrer, and R. Stöllinger. 2013. A ‘Manufacturing Imperative’ in the EU – Europe’s Position in Global Manufacturing and the Role of Industrial Policy. wiiw Research Report No. 391, October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• García-Solanes, J. and R. María-Dolores. 2002. “The Impact of European Structural Funds on Economic Convergence in European Countries and Regions.” In Convergence Issues in the European Union, edited by W. Meeusen and J. Villaverde, 334–358. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., E. Enkel, and H. Chesbrough. 2010. “The Future of Open Innovation.” R&D Management 40: 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., S. Redding, and J. Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 883–895.10.1162/0034653043125194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo F. 2010. Under which Circumstances do European Union Structural Funds Investments on Research and Innovation Achieve the Objective of Contributing to Convergence? London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, F., and M. Landabaso. 2011. “Merits, Problems and Paradoxes of Regional Innovation Policies.” Local Economy 26: 544–561.10.1177/0269094211417161
   Google Scholar
• Gripaios, P., and P. Bishop. 2006. “Objective One Funding in the UK: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 40: 937–951.10.1080/00343400600877839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., and D. Rodrik. 2003. “Economic Development as Self-discovery.” Journal of Development Economics 72: 603–633.10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., N. Es-Sadki, B. Buligescu, Léon L. Rivera, E. Griniece, and L. Roman. 2014. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014. Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., Léon L. Rivera, and L. Roman. 2012. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012. European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry. doi:10.2769/55659.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W. 2011. “Federal Coordination: Policy Making Beyond Command and Control.” Seminar on Territorial Dimension of Development Policy, Ostroda, Poland, July 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• IMAD. 2013. Poročilo o razvojuza 2013 [Development Report 2013]. Ljubljana: IMAD.
   Google Scholar
• Izsak K.P., R. Markianidou, and A. Lukach. 2013. Impact of the Crisis on Research and Innovation Policies. A study by Technopolis Group and IDEA Consult for the European Commission DG Research, Directorate C.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J. Y. 2009. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. 1999. Technology Policy in the Learning Economy. Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B., and S. Borras. 1997. The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mairate, A. 2006. “The ‘Added Value’ of European Union Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 40: 167–177.10.1080/00343400600600496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Tyler. 2006. “Evaluating the Impact of the Structural Funds on Objective 1 Regions: An Exploratory Discussion.” Regional Studies 40: 201–210.10.1080/00343400600600546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and R. Ortega-Argilés. 2013. “Smart Specialization Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
   Google Scholar
• Michie J., and C. Oughton. 2001. “Regional Innovation Strategies: Integrating Regional, Industrial and Innovation Policy.” New Economy 8 (3): 164–169.10.1111/newe.2001.8.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Morgan K. 1997. “The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal.” Regional Studies 31, 491–50310.1080/00343409750132289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan K. 2013. “The Regional State in the Era of Smart Specialisation.” Ekonomiaz No. 83, 2do cuatrimestre 83 (2): 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. The Internationalisation of Business R&D: Evidence, Impacts and Implications. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264044050-en.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton C., M. Landabaso, and K. Morgan. 2002. “The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 97–110. 10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. 1999. “Transformation of Science and Technology Systems into Systems of Innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: The Emerging Patterns and Determinants.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 10: 277–320.10.1016/S0954-349X(99)00016-8
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2011. “EU Innovation Policy: One Size Doesn’t Fit All!.” In Challenges for European Innovation Policy. Cohesion and Excellence from a Schumpeterian Perspective, edited by S. Radosevic and A. Kaderabkova, 112–149. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-León, L., M. Miedzinski, and A. Reid. 2010. Cohesion Policy and Regional Research and Innovation Potential – An Analysis of the Effects of Structural Funds Support for Research, Technological Development and Innovation 2000–2010. Regional Key Figures of the European Research Area. European Commission, Directorate General Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose A., and U. Fratesi. 2002. Unbalanced development strategies and the lack of regional convergence in the EU. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis 76. London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose A., and J. E. Garcilazo. 2012. “Quality of Governance and the Returns of Cohesion Expenditure.” OECD Regional Development Policy Conference “Understanding Growth in different Types of Regions.” Newcastle upon Tyne, March 26–27, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Romer P. M. 1989. Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. w3173. SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=227284.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar