Commentary: the perils and promise of inter-paradigmatic dialogues on remunicipalisation

References

• Cleaver, F. 2012. Development through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., F. Comin, and D. Diaz-Fuentes. 2006. “Privatizing Public Enterprises in the European Union 1960–2002: Ideological, Pragmatic, Inevitable?” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (5Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 736–756. doi:10.1080/13501760600808857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., M. E. Warner, R. Gradus, and G. Bel. 2019. “Re-municipalization of Public Services: Trend or Hype?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 1–12. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1691344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A. 2012. Reclaiming Public Ownership: Making Space for Economic Democracy. London, New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A., and S. Becker. 2018. “Making Sense of Remunicipalisation: Theoretical Reflections on and Political Possibilities from Germany’s Rekommumalisierung Process.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 503–517. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy025.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekström, and J. C. Karlsson. 2002. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. 2004. “Structured Pluralism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 275–290. doi:10.1080/1350178042000252965.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., E. Lobina, and P. Terhorst. 2013. “Re-municipalization in the Early Twenty-first Century: Water in France and Energy in Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics 27: 193–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2012.754844.
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 14 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1995. “The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, R. K. 2016. “Reclaiming Rational Theory Choice as Central: A Critique of Methodological Applications of Critical Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 15 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 245–262. doi:10.1080/14767430.2016.1169369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., E. Lobina, and O. Petitjean, eds. 2015. Our Public Water Future: The Global Experience with Remunicipalisation. Amsterdam, London, Paris, Cape Town and Brussels: Transnational Institute, Public Services International Research Unit, Multinationals Observatory, Municipal Services Project and the European Federation of Public Service Unions. (http://www.psiru.org/sites/default/files/2015-04-W-OurPublicWaterFutureFINAL.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., L. Steinfort, and O. Petitjean, eds. 2020. The Future Is Public: Towards Democratic Ownership of Public Services. Amsterdam and Paris: Transnational Institute (TNI), Multinationals Observatory, Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour (AK), Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), Danish Union of Public Employees (FOA), De 99 Van Amsterdam, The Democracy Collaborative (US), European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU), Ingeniería Sin Fronteras Cataluña (ISF), MODATIMA (Movement of defence of water, land and the environment, Chile), Municipal Services Project (MSP), the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV), Norwegian Union for Municipal and General Employees (Fagforbundet), Public Services International (PSI), Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Glasgow (Scotland) and We Own It (UK). (https://www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/tni_the-future-is-public_online.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, S., and O. Petitjean, eds. 2017. Reclaiming Public Services: How Cities and Citizens are Turning Back Privatisation. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, Multinationals Observatory, Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour (AK), European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU), Ingeniería Sin Fronteras Cataluña (ISF), Public Services International (PSI), Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), We Own It, Norwegian Union for Municipal and General Employees (Fagforbundet), Municipal Services Project (MSP) and Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). (https://www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/futureispublic_online_def_14_july.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2009. “Applied Economics, Contrast Explanation and Asymmetric Information.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (3Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 405–419. doi:10.1093/cje/ben047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Strat, A. 2010. Paris: Local Authorities Regain Control of Water Management. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. (https://www.tni.org/files/Paris%20Chapter%20by%20Anne%20Le%20Strat%20En_final.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Le Strat, A. 2014. “Discussion the Remunicipalization of Paris’s Water Supply Service: A Successful Reform.” Water Policy 16 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 197–204. doi:10.2166/wp.2013.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F.S. 2018. Microeconomic Theory: A Heterodox Approach, edited by Tae-Hee Jo. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E. 2013. “Remediable Institutional Alignment and Water Service Reform: Beyond Rational Choice.” International Journal of Water Governance 1 (1/2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 109–132. doi:10.7564/12-IJWG3.
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E., and D. Hall. 2014. “Corporatization in the European Water Sector: Lessons for the Global South.” In Public Ambiguity: Corporatization and Public Services in the Global South. edited by D. McDonald, 185–206. London: Zed Press. (https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/13333/7/13333%20LOBINA_Corporatization_in_the_European_Water_Sector_2014.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E. 2015. “Introduction: Calling for Progressive Water Policies.” In Our Public Water Future: The Global Experience with Remunicipalisation, edited by S. Kishimoto, E. Lobina, and O. Petitjean, 6–16. Amsterdam, London, Paris, Cape Town and Brussels: Transnational Institute, Public Services International Research Unit, Multinationals Observatory, Municipal Services Project and the European Federation of Public Service Unions. http://www.psiru.org/sites/default/files/2015-04-W-OurPublicWaterFutureFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E. 2017. “Water Remunicipalisation: Between Pendulum Swings and Paradigm Advocacy.” In Urban Water Trajectories. edited by S. Bell, A. Allen, P. Hofmann, and T. H. Teh, 149–161. London, UK: Springer. (https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/14983/1/14983%20LOBINA_Water_Remunicipalisation_2017.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E., and D. Hall 2013. “Water Privatisation and Remunicipalisation: International Lessons for Jakarta.” Report by the Public Services International Research Unit prepared for submission to Central Jakarta District Court Case No. 527/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Pst, November. http://www.psiru.org/sites/default/files/ 2014-W-03-JAKARTANOVEMBER2013FINAL.docx
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E., S. Kishimoto, and O. Petitjean. 2014. Here to Stay: Water Remunicipalisation as a Global Trend. London, Amsterdam, Paris: Public Services International Research Unit, Transnational Institute, Multinationals Observatory. November (https://www.psiru.org/sites/default/files/2014-11-W-HeretoStay.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Lobina, E., V. Weghmann, and M. Marwa. 2019. “Water Justice Will Not Be Televised: Moral Advocacy and the Struggle for Transformative Remunicipalisation in Jakarta.” Water Alternatives 12 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 725–748. (http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol12/v12issue3/534-a12-2-17/file)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. A. 2018. “Finding Common(s) Ground in the Fight for Water Remunicipalization.” Community Development Journal 54 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 59–79. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsy054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. A., and E. Swyngedouw. 2019. “The New Water Wars: Struggles for Remunicipalisation.” Water Alternatives 12 (2Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 322–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. A., and G. Ruiters, Eds. 2012. Alternatives to Privatization: Public Options for Essential Services in the Global South. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1Re-municipalization of public services: Trend or hype? ): 9–41. doi:10.4324/9780429498893-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., M. L. Van Genugten, and S. Van Thiel. 2020. “Re-interpreting re-municipalization: finding equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1701455.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and A. M. Aldag. 2019. “Re-municipalization in the US: A Pragmatic Response to Contracting.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1646133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar