Technological diversity in collaborative projects: insights into European research policy

References

• Aiginger, K., and S. Davies. 2004. “Industrial Specialization and Geographic Concentration: Two Sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union.” Journal of Applied Economics 12: 231–248. doi:10.1080/15140326.2004.12040610.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, E. 2012. “Understanding Long-Term Impacts of R&D Funding: The EU Framework Programme.” Research Evaluation 21 (5): 332–343. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, E., J. Clark, and A. Muscio. 2005. “What the Evaluation Record Tells us about EU Framework Programme Performance.” Science and Public Policy 32 (5): 385–397. doi:10.3152/147154305781779335.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., and S. Gertler. 2005. “The geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attaran, M., and M. Zwick. 1987. “Entropy and Other Measures of Industrial Diversification.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 26: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., R. Boschma, J. Crespo, and D. L. Rigby. 2019. “Smart Specialization Policy in the European Union: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification.” Regional Studies 53 (9): 1252–1268. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., R. Boschma, and J. Ravet. 2019. “Network Dynamics in Collaborative Research in the EU, 2003-2017.” European Planning Studies 27 (9): 1811–1837. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1641187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., M. Jofre-Bonet, and C. Lawson. 2015. “The Double-Edged Sword of Industry Collaboration: Evidence from Engineering Academics in the UK.” Research Policy 44: 1160–1175. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolli, T., and F. Somogyi. 2011. “Do Competitively Acquired Funds Induce Universities to Increase Productivity?” Research Policy 40 (1): 136–147. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 1987. “Power and centrality: A family of measures.” American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182. doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and A. Frenken. 2011. “Technological Relatedness and Regional Branching.” In Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation, edited by H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, and D. F. Kogler, 64–81. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and S. Iammarino. 2009. “Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy.” Economic Geography 85: 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., L. Cassi, F. Malerba, and N. Vonotars. 2009. “Networked Research: European policy Intervention for Information and Communication Technologies.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21 (7): 833–857. doi:10.1080/09537320903182314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and L. Cusmano. 2004. “Unveiling the Texture of a European Research Area: Emergence of Oligarchic Networks under EU Framework Programmes.” International Journal of Technology Management 27 (8): 747–772. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2004.004992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., S. Lissoni, and F. Malerba. 2003. “Knowledge-Relatedness in firm Technological Diversification.” Research Policy 32: 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., and F. Montobbio. 2016. “European Integration and Knowledge Flows across European Regions.” Regional Studies 50: 709–727. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.931572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., and M. Ozman. 2014. “Technological Diversity and Inventor Networks.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23: 161–178. doi:10.1080/10438599.2013.815473.
   Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., and N. Corrocher. 2015. “The Intensity of Interregional Cooperation in Information and Communication Technology Projects: An Empirical Analysis of the Framework Programme.” Regional Studies 49 (2): 204–218. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.759651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciffolilli, A., and A. Muscio. 2018. “Industry 4.0: National and Regional Comparative Advantages in Key Enabling Technologies.” European Planning Studies 26 (12): 2323–2343. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1529145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciffolilli, A., A. Muscio, and A. Reid. 2019. “Comparative Advantages in Industry 4.0 Key Enabling Technologies: Evidence from Horizon 2020 Research Projects.” In Background paper prepared for the World Bank (2020) report “Europe 4.0 - Addressing the Digital Dilemma”.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., A. Muscio, P. Simmonds, and N. von Tunzelmann May 2004. “Targeted Review of Added Value Provided by International R&D Programmes.” In Office of Science and Technology (OST) International - DTI.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., M. Gomez-Uranga, and G. Etxebarria. 1997. “Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions.” Research Policy 26: 475–491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2006. “Decision No 1982/2006/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 18 December 2006.” In concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2013. Decision 2013/743/EU of 3 December 2013, establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2020. “Council proposal (14239/20) of 18 December 2020, for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe.” In The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination.
   Google Scholar
• Crépon, B., E. DuGuet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. “Research, innovation and Productivity: An econometric analysis at the Firm level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7: 115–158. doi:10.1080/10438599800000031.
   Google Scholar
• Defazio, D., A. Lockett, and M. Wright. 2009. “Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program.” Research Policy 38: 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2015. “Relatedness Industrial Branching and Technological Cohesion in US Metropolitan Areas.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. An analysis of the role and engagement of universities with regard to participation in the Framework Programmes, DG Research and Innovation (study carried out by Ismeri Europa, Politecnico di Torino and IRCRES-CNR).
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog, G., W. Polt, J. Rojo, A. Tubke, and K. Zinocker 2002. “RTD Evaluation Toolbox: Assessing the Socio-Economic Impact of RTD Policies. STRATA Project HPV 1 CT 1999-00005.” IPTS Technical Report Series, EUR 20382 EN, Seville: IPTS.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., P. A. David, and B. H. Hall, 2011. “Smart specialization: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation.” MTEI-WORKING_PAPER-2011-001.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., and X. Goenega. 2013. “The Goals of Smart Specialisation.” S3 Policy Brief Series n° 01/2013 - May 2013, S3 Platform, JRC-IPTS.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., F. Van Oort, and T. Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies 41: 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., and R. A. Boschma. 2007. “A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process.” Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 635–649. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemba, K., and F. Kodama. 2001. “Diversification Dynamics of the Japanese Industry.” Research Policy 30: 1165–1184. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00140-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. 2001. “Evolving Frameworks for European collaboration in Research and Technology.” Research Policy 30: 891–903. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00163-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., B. Nooteboom, W. Vanhaverbekec, G. Duystersd, and A. Van Den Oorda. 2008. “Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density.” Research Policy 37: 1717–1731. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2003. “The impact of research grants on the productivity and quality of scientific research.” Ottawa: INRS Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O. 1998. “Towards a Theory of Technology-Based Firm.” Research Policy 27: 465–489. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00067-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., and C. Oskarsson. 1994. “Technology Diversification in “MUL-TECH” Corporations.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41: 355–364. doi:10.1109/17.364559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1992. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 29–47. doi:10.2307/3440244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, J., T. Scherngell, K. Frenken, and R. Tijssen. 2013. “Acquisition of European Research Funds and its Effect on International Scientific Collaboration.” Journal of Economic Geography 13: 23–52. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., L. Rivera Léon, and L. Roman. 2012. “Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012, European Commission.” Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry. doi:10.2769/55659.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, W. 2004. “International Technology Diffusion.” Journal of Economic Literature 42: 752–782. doi:10.1257/0022051042177685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2006. “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 27: 131–150. doi:10.1002/smj.507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity.” Social Studies of Science 35: 67–702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., and T. E. Uberti. 2007. “Inter-Regional knowledge flows in Europe: An Econometric Analysis.” In Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography, edited by K. Frenken: 230-255. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. 2005. “The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment using French survey Data.” The Journal of Technology Transfer, special issue in memory of Edwin Mansfield 30 (1–2): 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen., T., and T. Mitze. 2016. “Scientific Collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ Member States: Did Joining the European Union make a Difference?” Scientometrics 106: 1193–1215. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1824-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and R. Ortega-Argilés. 2013. “Modern Regional Innovation Policy.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6: 187–216. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and R. Ortega-Argilés. 2015. “Smart Specialization Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., and F. Quatraro. 2017. “Regional Branching and Key Enabling Technologies: Evidence from European Patent Data.” Economic Geography 93: 367–396. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A. 2006. “The European Added Value of Framework Programmes: Evidence from the UK, Economia.” Società e Istituzioni 3: 381–412.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A. 2013. “University-Industry Linkages: What are the Determinants of Distance in Collaborations?” Papers in regional science 92 (4): 715–739. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., and A. Ciffolilli. 2017. “Technological Diversity in Europe: Empirical Evidence from Agri-Food Projects Sponsored by the 7th Framework Programme.” Regional Studies 52 (3): 374–387. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1301662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., L. Rivera Leon, and A. Reid. 2015. “An empirical test of the Regional Innovation Paradox: Can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in the central and eastern European countries?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 18 (2): 153–171. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1013545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paier, M., and T. Scherngell. 2011. “Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Discrete Choice Model.” Industry and Innovation 18 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1080/13662716.2010.528935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandza, K., T. A. Wilkins, and E. A. Alfoldi. 2011. “Collaborative Diversity in a Nanotechnology Innovation System: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme.” Technovation 31: 476–489. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and S. Grodal. 2005. “Networks of Innovators.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson: 56-86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-Garcia, C., and C. A. Benavides-Velasco. 2008. “Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification.” Research Policy 37: 492–507. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger-Schluga, T., and M. J. Barber 2006. “The Structure of R&D Collaboration Networks in the European Framework Programmes.” UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2006-36, Maastricht: United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., and M. Barber. 2009. “Spatial Interaction Modelling of Cross-Region R&D Collaborations.” In Empirical Evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme, Papers in Regional Science 88, 531–546.
   Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., and M. Barber. 2011. “Distinct Spatial Characteristics of Industrial and Public Research Collaborations: Evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme.” Annals of Regional Science 46 (2): 247–266. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0334-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPRU. 1996. The Relationship between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance: A SPRU Review for HM Treasury. Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Panne, G. 2004. “Agglomeration Externalities: Marshall Versus Jacobs.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 593–604. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., J. Van Den Berg, J. Koch, and M. P. Hekkert. 2015. “Smart Innovation Policy: How Network Position and Project Composition Affect the Diversity of an Emerging Technology.” Research Policy 44: 1094–1107. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., and N. Von Tunzelmann. 2000. “Complexity and Functions of the Firm: Breadth and Depth.” Research Policy 29: 805–818. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00106-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., M. Neuländtner, and T. Scherngell. 2020. “Impacts of EU Funded R&D Networks on the Generation of Key Enabling Technologies: Empirical Evidence from a Regional Perspective.” Papers in Regional Science 99 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1111/pirs.12473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., T. Scherngell, and R. Lata. 2015. “Embeddedness of European Regions in European Union-Funded Research and Development (R&D) Networks: A Spatial Econometric Perspective.” Regional Studies 49 (10): 1685–1705. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.873119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar