References
- Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and Praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–315.10.17763/haer.60.3.013h5022862vu732
- Boynton, J. (2012). Facilitated Communication—what harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6, 3–13.10.1080/17489539.2012.674680
- Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Chan, J., & Nankervis, K. (2014). Stolen voices: Facilitated communication is an abuse of human rights. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 151–156.10.1080/17489539.2014.1001549
- Crossley, R. (1992). Getting the words out: Case studies in facilitated communication training. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 46–59.10.1097/00011363-199208000-00005
- Haskew, P., & Donnellan, A. M. (1993). Emotional maturity and well-being: Psychological lessons of facilitated communication. Madison, WI: DRI Press.
- Hemsley, B., & Dann, S. (2014). Social media and marketing in relation to facilitated communication: Harnessing the affordances of social media for knowledge translation. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 187–206.10.1080/17489539.2015.1023988
- Honey, M. (1994). Experts take sides over facilitated communication. http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1485&context=sumagazine
- Kavale, K. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2004). The positive side of special education: A history of fads, fancies, and follies. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
- Lilienfield, S. O., Marshall, J., Todd, J. T., & Shane, H. (2014). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 62–101.10.1080/17489539.2014.976332
- Mirenda, P. (2014). Comments and a personal reflection o the persistence of facilitated communication. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 102–110.10.1080/17489539.2014.997427
- Mostert, M. P. (2000). A partial etiology of discriminative disability: Bandwagons and beliefs. Exceptionality, 8, 117–132.10.1207/S15327035EX0802_3
- Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313.10.1023/A:1010795219886
- Mostert, M. P. (2010a). Introduction to the special issue: Asserting the empirical over the fanciful. Exceptionality, 18, 1–5.10.1080/09362830903462409
- Mostert, M. P. (2010b). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy—Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18, 1–5.10.1080/09362830903462409
- Mostert, M. P. (2012). Facilitated communication: The empirical imperative to prevent further professional malpractice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6, 18–27.10.1080/17489539.2012.693840
- Mostert, M. P. (2014). An activist approach for debunking facilitated communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 203–210.10.1177/1540796914556779
- Mostert, M. P., & Crockett, J. B. (1999–2000). Reclaiming the history of special education for more effective practice. Exceptionality, 8, 133–143.
- Stubblefield, A. (2011). Sound and fury: When opposition to facilitated communication functions as hate speech. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, The history of FC detraction, para. 13.
- Wombles, K. (2014). Some fads never die—They hide behind otter names: Facilitated communication is not and never will be augmentative and alternative communication. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 181–186.10.1080/17489539.2015.1012780