References
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2015, December 31). Evidence-based practice. Retrieved from: http://www.asha.org/Research/EBP/
- Boyle, M. (2011). Discourse treatment for word retrieval impairment in aphasia: The story so far. Aphasiology, 25, 1308–1326.
- Cherney, L. R., Patterson, J. P., Raymer, A., Frymark, T., & Schooling, T. (2008). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1282–1299.
- Cherney, L. R., Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., & Holland, A. (2013). Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: Methodological quality. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 535–545.
- Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., & Herzog, J. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596–1615.
- Croot, K., Nickels, L., Laurence, F., & Manning, M. (2009). Impairment-and activity/participation-directed interventions in progressive language impairment: Clinical and theoretical issues. Aphasiology, 23, 125–160.
- Grossman, M. (2010). Primary progressive aphasia: clinicopathological correlations. Nature Reviews Neurology, 6, 88–97.
- Henry, M. L., Meese, M. V., Truong, S., Babiak, M. C., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2013). Treatment for apraxia of speech in nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia. Behavioural Neurology, 26, 77–88.
- Hopper, T., Bourgeois, M., Pimentel, J., Qualls, C. D., Hickey, E., Frymark, T., & Schooling, T. (2013). An evidence-based systematic review on cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 126–145.
- Jokel, R., Rochon, E., & Anderson, N. D. (2010). Errorless learning of computer-generated words in a patient with semantic dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20, 16–41.
- Koul, R. & Van Sickle, A. J. (2010). There is a critical need for controlled data to support evidence based communication interventions in individuals with acquired brain injury. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 4, 169–172.
- McNeil, M. R., Small, S. L., Masterson, R. J., & Fossett, T. R. (1995). Behavioral and pharmacological treatment of lexical-semantic deficits in a single patient with primary progressive aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 76–87.
- Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150.
- Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647.
- Tate, R., Mcdonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401.
- Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014). Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardization. Aphasiology, 28, 1364–1384.
- Wendt, O. & Miller, B. (2012). Quality appraisal of single-subject experimental designs: An overview and comparison of different appraisal tools. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 235–268.
- World Health Organization (2015, December 12). Fact sheet 362 Dementia. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs362/en/