Speech and language therapy interventions for children with cleft palate: Evidence not proven

References

• Auperin, A., Pignon, J.-P., & Poynard, T. (1997). Review article: Critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 11, 215–225.10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.131302000.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., … Stroup, D. F. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637–639.10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, L., Albery, L., Bowden, M., Harding-Bell, A., Phippen, G., & Sell, D. (2014). A cross-sectional cohort study of speech in five-year-olds with cleft palate ± lip to support development of national audit standards: Benchmarking speech standards in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 51, 431–451.10.1597/13-121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell Collaboration. (2017). What is a systematic review? Retrieved from https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/research-resources/writing-a-campbell-systematic-review/systemic-review.html
   Google Scholar
• CLISPI. (2017). Cleft palate international speech issues. Retrieved from https://clispi.org/node/1
   Google Scholar
• Golding-Kushner, K. J. (2001). Therapy techniques for cleft palate speech & related disorders. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., & Nye, C. (2008). Understanding high quality research designs for speech language pathology. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 218–224.10.1080/17489530802646323
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., … Cochrane Bias Methods Group & Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. British Medical Journal, 343, d5928. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d592810.1136/bmj.d5928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). The Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). Retrieved March 2011, from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., & Lohmander, A. (Eds.). (2011). Cleft palate speech assessment and intervention. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmander, A., Willadsen, E., Persson, C., Henningsson, G., Bowden, M., & Hutters, B. (2009). Methodology for speech assessment in the Scandcleft project – An international randomized clinical trial on palatal surgery: Experiences from a pilot study. Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Journal, 46, 347–362.10.1597/08-039.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander, A., & Olsson, M. (2004). Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: A critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41, 64–70.10.1597/02-136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83, 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinusch, M., & Romonath, R. (2011). Early language intervention for children with cleft lip and/or palate: A systematic review. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 5, 197–215.10.1080/17489539.2012.678093
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, S. (Chair). (2014). Study guidelines in cleft palate speech: state-of the art and upcoming tasks. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the International Association of Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics (ICPLA2014), Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, S., & Romonath, R. (2012). Effectiveness of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in clients with cleft palate speech – A systematic review. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 37, 95–106.10.3109/14015439.2011.638669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D., Badenoch, D., Strauss, S., Haynes, B., et al. (2009). Oxford centre for evidence based medicine levels of evidence. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
   Google Scholar
• Schlesselman, J. J., & Collins, J. A. (2003). Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 21, 95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150.10.1080/17489530701560831
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8, 42. Retrieved from http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-8-1810.1186/1741-7015-8-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 103–121.10.1080/13682820400016522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, H. M., & Bernard, R. M. (2006). Calculating and synthesizing effect sizes. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 33, 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health – children and youth version. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar