Impact of aided AAC interventions on speech comprehension of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: A critically appraised topic

References

• Allen, A., Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., & Brock, K. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bopp, K. D., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Prelinguistic predictors of language development in children with autism spectrum disorders over four-five years. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 485–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brady, N. C. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(3), 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Fleming, K., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Olswang, L., Dowden, P., Saunders, M. D., & Marquis, J. (2012). Development of the communication complexity scale. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 16–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Brady, N. C., Storkel, H. L., Bushnell, P., Barker, R. M., Saunders, K., Daniels, D., & Fleming, K. (2015). Investigating a multimodal intervention for children with limited expressive vocabularies associated with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 438–549.
   Google Scholar
• **Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 50–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Drager, K. D. R., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test—III. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). The peabody picture vocabulary test—fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• *Emms, L., & Gardner, H. (2010). Study of two graphic symbol-teaching methods for individuals with physical disabilities and additional learning difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s Guide and Technical Manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J., Mason, R., Goodwyn, F., Boles, M., Heath, A., & Davis, J. (2014). Interaction of participant characteristics and type of AAC with individuals with ASD: A meta-analysis. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 516–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., Goodwyn, F., Kite, E., & Gilliland, W. (2015). Impact of PECS tablet computer app on receptive identification of pictures given a verbal stimulus. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(2), 82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R., Blitz, C., & Ross, S. W. (2014). The importance of contextual fit when implementing evidence-based interventions. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Human Services Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., Reichle, J., Feeley, K. M., & Jones, E. A. (2012). AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities. Brookes Publishing Company. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Y., McCleary, M., & Smith, M. (2018). Instructional strategies used in direct AAC interventions with children to support graphic symbol learning: A systematic review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(1), 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1311–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S. L., Stackhouse, T., & Wehner, E. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(5), 763–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 281–285.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sennott, S. C., Light, J. C., & McNaughton, D. (2016). AAC modeling intervention research review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. (2018). A systematic review of predictors, moderators, and mediators of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simacek, J., Pennington, B., Reichle, J., & Parker-McGowan, Q. (2018). Aided AAC for people with severe to profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of interventions and treatment intensity. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s41252-017-0050-4
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Balla, D. A., & Doll, E. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Survey forms manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., Raghavendra, P., & McAllister, S. (2017). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Contribution of critically appraised topics to evidence-based practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 11(1–2), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. J., & Layton, T. L. (1988). Speech following sign language training in autistic children with minimal verbal language. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(2), 217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar