Choosing a response topography for individuals with autism during functional communication training: A critically appraised topic

References

• Camargo, S. P. H., Rispoli, M., Ganz, J., Hong, E. R., Davis, H., & Mason, R. (2014). A review of the quality of behaviorally-based intervention research to improve social interaction skills of children with ASD in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(9), 2096–2116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. C., & Locke, J. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chezan, L. C., Wolfe, K., & Drasgow, E. (2017). A meta-analysis of functional communication training effects on problem behaviour and alternative communicative responses. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (2011). On the reliability and accuracy of the evaluative method for identifying evidence-based practices in autism. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 41–51).Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Falcomata, T. S., Ringdahl, J. E., Christensen, T. J., & Boelter, E. W. (2010). An evaluation of prompt schedules and mand preference during functional communication training. The Behavior Analyst Today, 11(1), 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2009). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerow, S., Davis, T., Radhakrishnan, S., Gregori, E., & Rivera, G. (2018). Functional communication training: The strength of evidence across disabilities. Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0014402918793399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. K., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R. I., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2(2), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnavatana, S., Wolfe, K., & Aguilar, J. (2018). Assessing mand topography preference when developing a functional communication training intervention. Behavior Modification, 42, 364–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancil, G. R. (2006). Functional communication training: A review of the literature related to children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(3), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matter, A. L., & Zarcone, J. R. (2017). A comparison of existing and novel communication responses used during functional communication training. Behavioral Interventions, 32, 217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichow, B. (2011). Development, procedures, and application of the evaluative method for determining evidence-based practices in autism. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 25–39).Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1311–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Crook, K., Molony, M., Vargo, K. K., … Taylor, C. J. (2018). Effects of response preference on resistance to change. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109, 265–280.doi:10.1002/jeab.308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Ryan, S., Ryan, A., Crook, K., & Molony, M. (2016). Further demonstrations of individual preference among mand modalities during functional communication training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 905–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, G., & Weinberg, S. (2006). Is there a relationship between language delays and behavior and socialization problems in toddlers?. Journal of Early Childhood and Infant Psychology, 2, 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., O‘Reilly, M., Ganz, J. B., Lancioni, G. E., & Schlosser, R. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology and Disability, 17(3), 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. L. (1981). The certainty of judgments in health evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 273–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 16–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torelli, J. N., Lambert, J. M., Da Fonte, M. A., Denham, K. N., Jedrzynski, T. M., & Houchins-Juarez, N. J. (2016). Assessing acquisition of and preference for mand topographies during functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(2), 165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, L., O’Reilly, M., Kuhn, M., Gevarter, C., Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., & Lang, R. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Raghavendra, P., & McAllister, S. (2017). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Contribution of critically appraised topics to evidence-based practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 11(1–2), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Wacker, D. P., & Kitsukawa, K (2009). Demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951–1966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar