Research Ethics Review: Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005

References

• Aldred , R. 2008 . Ethical and Political Issues in Contemporary Research Relationships . Sociology , 42 ( 5 ) : 887 – 903 .
   Google Scholar
• Annexe 6 2010 Securing Ethics Approval: A Route Map for Social Care Researchers , in Research Governance Framework: Resource Pack for Social Care , 2nd edn, April, Department of Health External Advisory Group for Implementing Research Governance in Social Care, Department of Health/Social Services Research Group/Association of Directors of Adult Services, London .
   Google Scholar
• Boddy , J. , Boaz , A. , Lupton , C. and Pahl , J. 2006 . What Counts as Research? The Implications for Research Governance in Social Care . International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 9 ( 4 ) : 317 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , I. 2002 . A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research . British Journal of Social Work , 32 ( 2 ) : 239 – 48 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvey , D. 2008 . The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing Situated Ethics in the Field . Sociology , 42 ( 5 ) : 905 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) (now National Research Ethics Service) 2001 Governance Arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees , 1st edn, July , Department of Health , London .
   Google Scholar
• Department for Constitutional Affairs 2007 Mental Capacity Act 2005. Code of Practice , TSO , London .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health 2005 Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care , 2nd edn, Department of Health, London .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health External Advisory Group for Implementing Research Governance in Social Care 2010 Research Governance Framework: Resource Pack for Social Care , 2nd edn, April, Department of Health/Social Services Research Group/Association of Directors of Adult Services, London .
   Google Scholar
• Dimond , B. 2008 . Legal Aspects of Mental Capacity , Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall , R. 2006 . Confronting the Anti-democrats: The Unethical Nature of Ethical Regulation in Social Science . Medical Sociology Online , 1 ( 1 ) : 51 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall , R. 2008 . The Ethical Case against Regulation in Humanities and Social Science Research . 21st Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences , 3 ( 1 ) : 1 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods , M. and Angell , E. 2009 . Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity: How Have Research Ethics Committees Interpreted the Requirements? . Journal of Medical Ethics , 35 ( 6 ) : 377 – 81 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods , M. , Angell , E. , Ashcroft , R. E. and Bryman , A. 2007 . Written Work: The Social Functions of Research Ethics Committee Letters . Social Science and Medicine , 65 ( 4 ) : 792 – 802 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dominelli , L. and Hollway , M. 2008 . Ethics and governance in social work research in the UK . British Journal of Social Work , 38 ( 5 ) : 1009 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn , M. , Clare , I. , Holland , A. and Gunn , M. 2007 . Constructing and Reconstructing “Best Interests”: An Interpretive Examination of Substitute Decision-making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 . Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law , 29 ( 2 ) : 117 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Griffith , R. 2006 . Making Decisions for Incapable Adults 4: Participation in Research . British Journal of Community Nursing , 11 ( 6 ) : 261 – 65 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffith , R. and Tengnah , C. 2010 . Safeguarding Research Subjects Who Lack Decision-making Capacity . British Journal of Community Nursing , 15 ( 10 ) : 508 – 12 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haggerty , K. D. 2004 . Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics . Qualitative Sociology , 27 ( 4 ) : 391 – 420 .
   Google Scholar
• Harris , D. and Fineberg , I. 2011 . Multidisciplinary Palliative Care Teams’ Understanding of Mental Capacity Act 2005 “Best Interest” Determinations . International Journal of Palliative Nursing , 17 ( 1 ) : 20 – 25 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedgecoe , A. 2008 . Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship . Sociology , 42 ( 5 ) : 873 – 86 .
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber , S. and Leavy , P. 2006 . The Practice of Qualitative Research , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Holland , K. 2007 . The Epistemological Basis of Ethics Review: Constraining Mental Health Research . Qualitative Inquiry , 13 ( 6 ) : 895 – 913 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns , R. 2007 . Who Decides Now? Protecting and Empowering Vulnerable Adults Who Lose the Capacity to Make Decisions for Themselves . British Journal of Social Work , 37 ( 4 ) : 557 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Malouff , J. M. and Schutte , N. S. 2005 . Academic Psychologists’ Perspectives on the Human Research Ethics Review Process . Australian Psychologist , 40 ( 1 ) : 57 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthorpe , J. , Rapaport , J. , Harris , J. and Samsi , K. 2009 . Realising the Safeguarding Potential of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Early Reports from Adult Safeguarding Staff . Journal of Adult Protection , 11 ( 2 ) : 13 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• McKeown , J. , Clarke , A. , Ingleton , C. and Repper , J. 2010 . Actively Involving People with Dementia in Qualitative Research . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 19 ( 13/14 ) : 1935 – 43 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mental Capacity Act Fact Sheet for Social Scientists 2010 Available at: < http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@pg/documents/digitalasset/dh_106217.pdf > (accessed 1 November 2010) .
   Google Scholar
• Miles , M. B. & Huberman , A. M . 1994 . Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook second edition , Sage, Newbury Park, CA .
   Google Scholar
• Murphy , E. and Dingwall , R. 2007 . Informed Consent and Ethnographic Practice . Social Science and Medicine , 65 ( 1 ) : 2223 – 34 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Research Ethics Service 2009 Standard Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees , v4, April, National Patient Safety Agency, Department of Health, London .
   Google Scholar
• Norman , R. , Sellman , D. and Warner , C. 2006 . Mental Capacity, Good Practice and the Cyclical Consent Process in Research Involving Vulnerable People . Clinical Ethics , 1 ( 4 ) : 228 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport , J. , Manthorpe , J. and Stanley , N. 2009 . Mental Health and Mental Capacity Law: Some Mutual Concerns for Social Work Practice . Practice: Social Work in Action , 21 ( 2 ) : 91 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Samsi , K. and Manthorpe , J. 2011 . “I Live for Today”: A Qualitative Study Investigating Older People's Attitudes to Advance Planning . Health and Social Care in the Community , 19 ( 1 ) : 52 – 59 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Research Ethics Committee Website , available at: < http://www.screc.org.uk > (accessed 1 November 2010) .
   Google Scholar
• Wald , D. D. 2004 . Bureaucracy of Ethics Applications . British Medical Journal , 329 ( 7460 ) : 282 – 84 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walley , T. 2006 . Using Personal Health Information in Medical Research . British Medical Journal , 332 ( 7534 ) : 130 – 31 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warner , J. , McCarney , R. , Griffin , M. , Hill , K. and Fisher , P. 2008 . Participation in Dementia Research: Rates and Correlates of Capacity to Give Informed Consent . Journal of Medical Ethics , 34 ( 3 ) : 167 – 70 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson , E. , Pollock , K. and Aubeeluck , A. 2010 . Gaining and Maintaining Consent when Capacity can be an Issue: A Research Study with People with Huntington's Disease . Clinical Ethics , 5 ( 3 ) : 142 – 47 .
   Google Scholar