ethics and/or Ethics in Qualitative Social Research: Negotiating a Path around and between the Two

References

• Anderson, N. (1992) ‘Work Group Innovation: A State of the Art Review’, in Organizational Change and Perspective: Psychological Perspective and Practices in Europe, eds D. M. Hosking & N. Anderson, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2008) Introducing Qualitative Research, London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, S. (2001) Ethics—A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B. (2009) Tick Box for Child? The Ethical Positioning of Children. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(6), 858–64. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottle, T. (2002) On Narratives and the Sense of Self. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 535–549. 10.1177/107780002237003
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E., Kay, H., & Tisdall, K. (2002) Research with Children: Sharing the Dilemmas. Child and Family Social Work, 7(1), 47–56. 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00223.x
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2010) The Impact of a Child Protection Investigation: A Personal Reflective Account. Child and Family Social Work, 16(2), 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, A. & Stewart, A. (2004) Sudden Death in Childhood. Butterworth Heinemann (Elsevier) UK .
   Google Scholar
• Dyregrov, K. (2004a) Strategies of Professional Assistance after Traumatic Deaths: Empowerment or Disempowerment?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 181–189. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00393.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyregrov, K. (2004b) Bereaved Parents' Experience of Research Participation. Social Science & Medicine, 58(2), 391–400. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00205-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1998) ‘But is it Ethical? Learning to do it Right’, in Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: An Introduction, Addison Wesley Longman, 2nd ednNew York.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1956) Embarrassment and Social Organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264–71. 10.1086/222003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959) Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Double Day Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004) Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–80. 10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2007) Rethinking Ethics Review as Institutional Discourse. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 336–52. 10.1177/1077800406297651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2010) Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2010) Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A. (2008) Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship. Sociology, 42(5), 873–86. 10.1177/0038038508094567
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N., Gewurtz, R., & Haydon, E. (2007) Ethical Review of Interpretive Research: Problems and Solutions. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 29(5), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keenan, T. (1997) Fables of Responsibility: Aberrations and Predicaments in Ethics and Politics, Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, F. (2002) ‘Yet Another Crisis Coming? Coping with Guidelines from the Tri-Council’, in Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, eds W. C. van den Hoonaard, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1991) Feminist Research in Education: Within/Against, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riches, G., & Dawson, P. (1996) Making Stories and Taking Stories: Methodological Reflections on Researching Grief and Marital Tension Following the Death of a Child. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(3), 357–365(9).
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. & Usher, R. (2000) Situated Ethics in Educational Research, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. (2002) ‘Confidentiality and Anonymity: Promises and Practices’, in Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, eds W. C. van den Hoonaard, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (1994) The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–49. 10.1007/BF00992905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (2010) The ESRC's 2010 Framework for Research Ethics: Fit for Research Purpose?, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 15, no. 4.10.5153/sro.2265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A. (2002) ‘My Research Friend? My Friend the Researcher? My Friend, My Researcher? Mis/Informed Consent and People with Developmental Disabilities’, in Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, eds W. C. van den Hoonaard, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, M. & Nichol, G. (2002) ‘The Harmony of Resistance: Qualitative Research and Ethical Practice in Social Work’, in Walking the Tightrope: Ethical issues for Qualitative Researchers, eds W. C. Van Den Hoonaard, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2002) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M. (2002) ‘Biting the Hand that Feeds You and Other Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork’. eds Van Den Hoonaard, & C. Will (Eds.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical issues for Qualitative Researchers, (pp. 79–94). , Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2011) BNIM Short Guide bound with the BNIM Detailed Manual, available from: <[email protected]>.
   Google Scholar