Limitations of Virtue Ethics in the Social Professions

References

• Alderman, H. (1997) ‘By Virtue of a Virtue’, in Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, ed. D. Statman, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 145–64.
   Google Scholar
• Baistow, K. (1994) ‘Liberation and Regulation? Some Paradoxes of Empowerment’, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 14, no. 42, pp. 34–46. 10.1177/026101839401404203
   Google Scholar
• Baines, D. (ed) (2011) Doing Anti-oppressive Practice: Social Justice Social Work, Fernwood, Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. & Gallagher, A. (2009) Ethics in Professional Life: Virtues for Health and Social Care, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2004) ‘Blame, Oppression, and Diminished Moral Competence’, in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, eds. P. DesAutels & M.U. Walker, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bisman C. (2004) ‘Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 109–23. 10.1093/bjsw/bch008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boryczka, J.M. (2006) ‘The Virtues of Vice: The Lowell Mill Girl Debate and Contemporary Feminist Ethics’, Feminist Theory, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–67. 10.1177/1464700106061455
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2008) ‘Reflections on the Metavirtue of Sensitivity to Suffering’, Hypatia, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 182–88. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01212.x
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2007) ‘Professional Responsibility, Misconduct and Practical Reason’, Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–75. 10.1080/17496530701237175
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D.J. (2009) ‘Reclaiming Anti-Oppressive Ethics in Professional Education’, Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D.J. & Burke, B. (2008) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Ethics and Values, Palgrave, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cudd, A.E. (2006) Analyzing Oppression, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J. & Burke, B. (2006) Anti-Oppressive Practice Social Care and the Law, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• DesAutels, P. & Waugh J. (2001b) ‘Introduction’, in Feminists Doing Ethics, eds. P. DesAutels & J. Waugh, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. ix–xxx.
   Google Scholar
• DesAutels P. & Walker, M.U. (eds) (2004) Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2008) ‘Virtues and Oppression: A Complicated Relationship’, Hypatia, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 189–96. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01213.x
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2009) ‘Feminist Virtue Ethics, Happiness, and Moral Luck’, Hypatia, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 29–40. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. (1965) ‘The New Idealism: Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences’, in Problems in the Philosophy of Science, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, eds. I. Lakatos & R. Musgrave, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 377–406.
   Google Scholar
• Gray M. (2010) ‘Moral Sources and Emergent Ethical Theories in Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1794–811. 10.1093/bjsw/bcp104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2009) ‘The Deformation of Professional Formation: Managerial Targets and the Undermining of Professional Judgement’, Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–30. 10.1080/17496530902951871
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. (2006) The Ethics Of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. & Kendrick, M. (2009) ‘The Ambiguities of Professional and Societal Wisdom’, Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 158–69. 10.1080/17496530902951921
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2003) ‘Professional Values and Ethics in Social Work: Reconsidering Postmodernism?’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1025–41. 10.1093/bjsw/33.8.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. (1997a) ‘Virtue Ethics and the Emotions’, in Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, ed. D. Statman, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. (1997b) On Virtue Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Koggel, C. (2008) ‘Burdening the Burdened Virtues’, Hypatia, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 197–204. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01214.x
   Google Scholar
• Kole, J.J. & de Ruyter, D.J. (2009) ‘Nothing Less than Excellence: Ideals of Professional Identity’, Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. (1997) ‘Foucault's Ethics and Politics: A Strategy for Feminism?’, in The Impact of Foucault on the Social Sciences and Humanities, eds. M. Lloyd & A. Thacker, MacMillan, London, pp. 78–101.
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, G. & Webb, S.A. (2002) ‘Virtue Ethics And Social Work: Being Lucky, Realistic And Not Doing One's Duty. A Review of “Virtue Theory” and How It Applies to Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1015–936. 10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, M.A. (2001) ‘Feminist Ethics: Care as a Virtue’, in Feminists Doing Ethics, eds. P. DesAutels & J. Waugh, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 101–18.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K. (2005) ‘From Ridicule to Institutionalisation: Anti-oppression, the State and Social Work’, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, M. (2000) Gender and Agency, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2004) ‘“Ideal Theory” as Ideology’, in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, eds. P. DesAutels & M.U. Walker, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 163–82.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H.L. (2001) ‘Identity and Free Agency’, in Feminists Doing Ethics, eds. P. DesAutels & J. Waugh, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. (2002). Oppression and Responsibility: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Social Practices and Moral Theory, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, O. (1987) ‘Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics’, in Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, ed. J.D.G. Evans, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, O. (1989) ‘Justice, Gender and International Boundaries’, Wider Working Papers, World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University, Annankatu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Pence, G. (1993) ‘Virtue Theory’, in A Companion to Ethics, ed. P. Singer, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 249–58.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, A. (2012) ‘The Use and Abuse of Morality’, Journal of Ethics, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, S. (2007) Needs and Moral Necessity, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
   Google Scholar
• Sander-Staudt, M. (2006) ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics’, Hypatia Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, A. (2005) The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, A. (2011) Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T.A. (1962) ‘Introduction’, in Aristotle: The Politics, Trans. T.A. Sinclair, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Soloman, R.C. (1997) ‘Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics’, in Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, ed. D. Statman, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 205–26.
   Google Scholar
• Statman, D. (1997) ‘Introduction to Virtue Ethics’, in Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, ed. D. Statman, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, C. (2003) Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Tessman, L. (2005) Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Tessman, L. (2009) Feminist Eudaimonism: Eudaimonism as Non-Ideal Theory, in Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-ideal, ed. L. Tessman, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J.C. (2001) ‘Does Managing Professionals Affect Professional Ethics? Competence Autonomy and Care’, in Feminists Doing Ethics, eds. P. DesAutels & J. Waugh, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S.A. (2010) ‘Virtue Ethics’, in Ethics and Values Perspectives in Social Work, eds. M. Gray & S.A. Webb, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 108–19.
   Google Scholar
• Whisnant, R. (2004) ‘Woman Centered: A Feminist Ethic of Responsibility’, in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, eds. P. DesAutels & M.U. Walker, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. & Beresford P. (2000) ‘Anti-Oppressive Practice: Emancipation or Appropriation’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 553–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar