Oppression and professional ethics

References

• Ahmed, S. 1998. Differences That Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assiter, A. 2004. “The Objectivity of Value.” In Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier, edited by M. S. Archer and W. Outhwaite, 64–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 2011. “An Overview of Anti-Oppressive Practice: Roots, Theory, Tensions.” In Doing Anti- Oppressive Practice, edited by D. Baines, 1–24. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2004. Ethics, Accountability, and the Social Professions. Milton Keynes: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. 2008. “Reflections on the Metavirtue of Sensitivity to Suffering.” Hypatia 23 (3): 182–188.
   Google Scholar
• Chambon, A., A. Irving, and A. Epstein, eds. 1999. Reading Foucault for Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. J. 1998 Social Assessment Theory and Practice: A Multi-Disciplinary Framework. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. 2009. “Reclaiming Anti-Oppressive Ethics in Professional Education.” Ethics and Social Welfare 3 (1): 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. 2013. “Ethics, Politics and the Social Professions: Reading Iris Marion Young.” Ethics and Social Welfare 7 (1): 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. 2014. “Limitations of Virtue Theory in the social professions.” Ethics and Social Welfare 8 (1): 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. J., and B. Burke. 2008. Anti-Oppressive Social Work Ethics and Values. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cocker, C., and T. Hafford-Letchfield. 2014. Re-Thinking Anti-Discriminatory and Anti-Oppressive Theories for Social Work. Milton Keynes: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, A. 1994. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P.H. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cudd, A.E. 2005. “How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1): 20–49. doi: 10.1177/0048393104271923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudd, A.E. 2006. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., and B. Burke. 1995. Anti-Oppressive Practice: Social Care and the Law. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. 2002. Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Einspahr, J. 2010. “Structural Domination and Structural Freedom: A Feminist Perspective.” Feminist Review 94: 1–19. doi:10.1057/fr.2009.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., and M. Nagel. 2009. “Introduction.” In Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young, edited by A. Ferguson and M. Nagel, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1997. “A Rejoinder to Iris Young.” New Left Review 223: 126–129.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2008. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friere, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, M. 1983. The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P.M. 2007. “The Relevance of Bourdieu for Social Work: A Reflection on Obstacles and Omissions.” Journal of Social Work 7 (3): 355–379. doi: 10.1177/1468017307084076
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M., and J. H. Schiele. 2010. “Equality-of-Oppressions and Anti-Discriminatory Models in Social Work: Reflections from the USA and UK.” European Journal of Social Work 13 (2): 231–244. doi: 10.1080/13691451003690882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, K. 2000. Social Work Practices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillock, S. 2014. “Deconstructing the Family.” In Ethics, Values and Social Work Practice, edited by L. Bell and T. Hafford-Letchfield, 196–210. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillock, S. 2012. “Conceptualizations and Experiences of Oppression: Gender Differences.” Affilia Journal of Women and Social Work 27 (1): 38–50. doi: 10.1177/0886109912437494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 2000. Where We Stand: Class Matters. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. 2001. “Beyond Social Constructionism: Critical Realism and Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 31 (6): 845–861. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.6.845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, E.F. 1999. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, C. 2014. “Institutional Racism and Individual Agency: A Case Study using Foucault's Disciplinary Power.” Critical Social Work. Accessed February 25, 2015. http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/institutional_racism.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 1997. “Foucault's Ethics and Politics, a Strategy for feminism?.” In The Impact of Foucault on the Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by M. Lloyd and A. Thacker, 78–101. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. 2004. “‘Ideal Theory’ as Ideology.” In Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, edited by P. DesAutels and M. U. Walker, 163–182. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, C., and S. Macfarlane. 2012. “The Nexus Between Feminism and Postmodernism: Still a Central Concern for Critical Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work, 42 (4): 687–705. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. 2002. Oppression and Responsibility: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Social Practices and Moral Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. 2008. Morality and Our Complicated Form of Life: Feminist Wittgensteinian Metaethics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, J. 2004. “Commerce and the Language of Value.” In Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier, edited by M. S. Archer and W. Outhwaite, 87–93. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, S. 2007. Needs and Moral Necessity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2004. “Restoring the Moral Dimension in Social Scientific Accounts: A Qualified Ethical Naturalist Approach.” In Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier, edited by M. S. Archer and W. Outhwaite, 93–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2005. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slote, M. 2007. The Ethics of Care and Empathy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., and S. Wise. 1983. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., and S. Wise. 1994. Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stepney, P. 2009. “English Social Work at the Crossroads: A Critical View.” Australian Social Work 62 (1): 10–27. doi: 10.1080/03124070802631802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessman, L. 2005. Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. U. 2001. “Seeing Power in Morality: A Proposal for Feminist Naturalism in Ethics.” In Feminists Doing Ethics, edited by P. Desautels and J. Waugh, 2–14. Lanham Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. 1999. “Connecting Anti-racist and Anti-oppressive Theory and Practice: Retrenchment or Reappraisal?.” British Journal of Social Work 29 (2): 211–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M. 1997. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar