A letter to the late Felix Biestek: Revisiting the seven principles of The Casework Relationship with contemporary struggles

References

• Abrams, L., and L. Curran. 2004. “Between Women: Gender and Social Work in Historical Perspective.” Social Service Review 78 (3): 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agger, B. 2012. Oversharing: Presentations of Self in the Internet Age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2008. “Critical Commentary: Social Work Ethics.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (6): 1238–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, S. 2005. “The Value of Acceptance in Social Work Direct Practice: A Historical and Contemporary View.” Social Service Review 79 (3): 482–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biestek, F. P. 1957. The Casework Relationship. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bisman, C. 2004. “Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (1): 109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisno, H. 1958. The Casework Relationship. Edited by Felix P. Biestek, S. J. Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1957. 149 pp. $3.00, Social Work 3 (1): 87.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, W. 1958. “The Nature of Social Work.” Social Work 3: 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, S. 1950. “The Nature and Definition of Social Casework.” In Principles and Techniques in Social Casework: Selected Articles, 1940–1950, edited by C. Kasius 97–127. New York: Family Service Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, V. 2006. “Moving from Professionally Specific Ideals to the Common Morality: Essential Content in Social Work Ethics Education.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 26 (3): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chenot, D. 1998. “Mutual Values: Self Psychology, Intersubjectivity, and Social Work.” Clinical Social Work Journal 26 (3): 297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, J. C. S. 2013. “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other.” Journal of Social Work Practice 27 (4): 471–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W. C. K., and M. S. Tsui. 2008. “The Nature of Practice Wisdom in Social Work Revisited.” International Social Work 51 (1): 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W. C. K., M. Tsui, and M. Yan. 2009. “Social Work as a Moral and Political Practice.” International Social Work 52 (3): 287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan-Daston, R., M. Hunter-Sloan, and E. Fullmer. 2013. “Considering the Ethical Implications of Social Media in Social Work Education.” Ethics and Information Technology 15 (1): 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J. W. 1958. “Science, ‘Art’, and Uncertainty in Social Work.” Social Work 3: 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, H. 1986. Social Work as Art: Making Sense of Good Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Flexner, A. 1915. “Is Social Work a Profession?” In Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 576–591. Chicago: Hildman.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2011. “Towards an Alternative Concept of Privacy.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9 (4): 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, S., P. Gilligan, and A. Neagoe. 2013. “Ethical Dilemmas of the Social Work Professional in a (post-) Secular Society, with Special Reference to the Christian Social Worker.” International Social Work 56 (3): 310–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. 2010. “Moral Sources and Emergent Ethical Theories in Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (6): 1794–1811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, E., E. Berg, J. Barry, and J. Chandler. 2013. “Neoliberalism, Managerialism and the Reconfiguring of Social Work in Sweden and the United Kingdom.” Organization 20 (4): 534–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 1999. “State Social Work and Social Citizenship in Britain: From Clientelism to Consumerism.” British Journal of Social Work 29 (6): 915–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Y., and X. Ruan. 2010. Reconstitution of Social Work: Towards a Moral Conception of Social Work Practice. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, P. K. 2012. “Back to the ‘Social’ of Social Work: Reviving the Social Work Profession's Contribution to the Promotion of Social Justice.” International Social Work. doi:10.1177/0020872812447118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, E., and J. Kim. 2013. “Virtual Boundaries: Ethical Considerations for Use of Social Media in Social Work.” Social Work 58 (2): 185–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambley, S. 2010. “Managers: Are They Really to Blame for What's Happening to Social Work?” Social Work and Social Sciences Review 14 (2): 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Larose, R., R. Connolly, H. Lee, K. Li, and K. D. Hales. 2014. “Connection Overload? A Cross Cultural Study of the Consequences of Social Media Connection.” Information Systems Management 31 (1): 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, V. 2011. “Often There Is a Good Deal to be Done, but Socially rather than Medically: The Psychiatric Social Worker as Social Therapist.” Medical History 55 (2): 223–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhofer, J., and J. Floersch. 2012. “The Coming Crisis in Social Work.” Research on Social Work Practice 22 (5): 499–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovat, T., and M. Gray. 2008. “Towards a Proportionist Social Work Ethics: A Habermasian Perspective.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (6): 1100–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M. 2014. “Understanding Personalisation: Implications for Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 14 (3): 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., and J. Ord. 2013. “Youth Work, Self-disclosure and Professionalism.” Ethics and Social Welfare 7 (4): 326–341.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., M. Duggan, and S. Joseph. 2013. “Relationship-based Social Work and Its Compatibility with the Person-centred Approach: Principled Versus Instrumental Perspectives.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (4): 703–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwansa, L. K. 2008. The Casework Relationship. 12th ed. Edited by Felix P. Biestek, S. J. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd, Loyola University Press, 1989, pp. 149. British Journal of Social Work 38 (4): 820–822.
   Google Scholar
• Okpych, N. J., and J. L. H. Yu. 2014. “A Historical Analysis of Evidence-based Practice in Social Work: The Unfinished Journey toward an Empirically Grounded Profession.” Social Service Review 88 (1): 3–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, P., M. Tsui, and G. Ruch. 2013. “The Boundaries of the Social Work Relationship Revisited: Towards a Connected, Inclusive and Dynamic Conceptualisation.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (1): 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornstein, E. D., and Ganzer, C. 2005. “Relational Social Work: A Model for the Future.” Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 86 (4): 565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. 2000. Anti-bureaucratic Social Work. Birmingham: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. (2007). Dual relationships: personal and professional boundaries in rural social work. British Journal of Social Work, 37 (8): 1405–1423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman, H. H. 1957. “The Casework Relationship by Felix P. Biestek.” Social Service Review 31 (4): 452–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. 1998. “The Evolution of Social Work Ethics.” Social Work 43 (6): 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. 2011. Eye on Ethics: Developing a Social Media Ethics Policy. http://www.socialworktoday.com/news/eoe_070111.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, M. 2013. “Social Work Education and the Neo-liberal Challenge: The US Response to Increasing Global Inequality.” Social Work Education 32 (6): 715–733.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. 1951. Client-centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. 1961. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. 1980. A Way of Being. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, S. 2010. “‘Speaking Back’ to Fear: Responding to the Moral Dilemmas of Risk in Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1065–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosone, C. 2004. “Relational Social Work: Honoring the Tradition.” Smith College Studies in Social Work 74 (3): 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Whan, M. 1986. “On the Nature of Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 16 (2): 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. 2005. “Social Work and Narrative Ethics.” The British Journal of Social Work 35 (8): 1249–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar