‘It’s All Public Anyway’: A Collaborative Navigation of Anonymity and Informed Consent in a Study with Identifiable Parent Carers

References

• Allen, R. E. S., and J. L. Wiles. 2016. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Participants Choosing Research Pseudonyms.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 13 (2): 149–165. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2012. Ethics and Values in Social Work. 4th ed. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, J., and J. Nisker. 2015. “Tensions Between Anonymity and Thick Description When ‘Studying Up’ in Genetics Research.” Qualitative Health Research 25 (2): 276–282. doi:10.1177/1049732314552194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botes, A. 2000. “A Comparison Between the Ethics of Justice and the Ethics of Care.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 (5): 1071–1075. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01576.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busher, H., and A. Fox. 2021. “The Amoral Academy? A Critical Discussion of Research Ethics in the Neo-Liberal University.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (5): 469–478. doi:10.1080/00131857.2019.1707656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. 2011. “Ethics and Politics in Qualitative Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 61–80. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, G. 2013. Research Ethics: A Philosophical Guide to the Responsible Conduct of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damianakis, T., and M. R. Woodford. 2012. “Qualitative Research with Small Connected Communities: Generating New Knowledge While Upholding Research Ethics.” Qualitative Health Research 22 (5): 708–718. doi:10.1177/1049732311431444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., E. L. James, S. Kippen, and P. Liamputtong. 2008. “Risks to Researchers in Qualitative Research on Sensitive Topics: Issues and Strategies.” Qualitative Health Research 18 (1): 133–144. doi:10.1177/1049732307309007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, E., and P. Buckley. 2017. “Embracing Qualitative Research: A Visual Model for Nuanced Research Ethics Oversight.” Qualitative Research 17 (1): 95–117. doi:10.1177/1468794116661230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Y. 2021. “What's in a (Pseudo)Name? Ethical Conundrums for the Principles of Anonymisation in Social Media Research.” Qualitative Research 21 (5): 686–702. doi:10.1177/1468794120922070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., J. Jacobson, B. Wellman, and P. Mai. 2016. “Understanding Communities in an Age of Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Complicated.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (9): 1187–1193. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. 2009. “Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 19 (11): 1632–1641. doi:10.1177/1049732309350879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, H., R. Edwards, and T. Brannelly. 2017. “Identity and Power in Co-Produced Activist Research.” Qualitative Research 17 (3): 289–301. doi:10.1177/1468794117696033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakakis, S., B. Waller, N. Kagotho, and T. Edmond. 2015. “Conducting Safe Research with at-Risk Populations: Design Strategies from a Study with Unauthorized Immigrant Women Experiencing Intimate Abuse.” Qualitative Social Work 14 (2): 259–274. doi:10.1177/1473325014538995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, B. P., E. Zaretsky, and H. A. Euler. 2016. “Pseudo Names are More Than Hollow Words: Sex Differences in the Choice of Pseudonyms.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (3): 287. doi:10.1177/0261927X15587102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linabary, J., and D. Corple. 2019. “Privacy for Whom? A Feminist Intervention in Online Research Practice.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (10): 1447–1463. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 2018. “Ethics of Qualitative Data Collection.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, edited by U. Flick, 33–48. Sage. doi:10.4135/9781526416070.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 2021. “Transformative Research Methods to Increase Social Impact for Vulnerable Groups and Cultural Minorities.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20: 160940692110515. doi:10.1177/16094069211051563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukungu, K. 2017. “‘How Can You Write About a Person Who Does Not Exist?’: Rethinking Pseudonymity and Informed Consent in Life History Research.” Social Sciences 6 (3). doi:10.3390/socsci6030086.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. 2008. “Anonymity.” In The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. Given, 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. http://methods.sagepub.com.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au/reference/sage-encyc-qualitative-research-methods.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, R. K., and L. Pratchett. 2009. “E-Citizenship: Reconstructing the Public Online.” In Changing Local Government, Changing Citizens, edited by C. Durose, S. Greasley, and L. Richardson, 193–210. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Kitzinger, and C. Kitzinger. 2015a. “Anonymising Interview Data: Challenges and Compromise in Practice.” Qualitative Research 15 (5): 616–632. doi:10.1177/1468794114550439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Kitzinger, and C. Kitzinger. 2015b. “Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (2): 125–137. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.948697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, N. 2016. “The Myth of Anonymity.” Nature 537 (7619): S70–S72. doi:10.1038/537S70a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, L., and K. Woodthorpe. 2011. “Is it the End for Anonymity as We Know It? A Critical Examination of the Ethical Principle of Anonymity in the Context of 21st Century Demands on the Qualitative Researcher.” Qualitative Research 11 (2): 197–212. doi:10.1177/1468794110394073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D., and R. Webb. 2014. “Ethics and/or Ethics in Qualitative Social Reseach: Negotiating a Path Around and Between the Two.” Ethics and Social Welfare 8 (4): 383–396. doi:10.1080/17496535.2012.745583.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, A. 2012. “Beyond Research Ethics: Anonymity as ‘Ontology’, ‘Analysis’, and ‘Independence’.” Qualitative Research 13 (6): 685–698. doi:10.1177/1468794112459669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, G. 2005. “Research Ethical Guidelines and Anonymity.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 28 (1): 83–93. doi:10.1080/01406720500036786.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. J., and S. A. Baker. 2016. “The Selfie and the Transformation of the Public–Private Distinction.” Information, Communication & Society, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1220969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, J. 1997. “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction.” In Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, edited by J. Weintraub and K. Kumar, 1–42. London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., G. Crow, S. Heath, and V. Charles. 2008. “The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (5): 417–428. doi:10.1080/13645570701622231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar