Three Policy Alternatives for Advancing Active Citizenship: Universal Basic Income, Universal Basic Services, and Social Economy

References

• Bergmann, B. R. 2004. “A Swedish-Style Welfare State or Basic Income: Which Should Have Priority?” Politics & Society 32 (1): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329203261101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2006. The Primacy of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, J. U. 2019. “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., and J. Defourny. 2001. The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. 2021. “Sustainable Welfare: How do Universal Basic Income and Universal Basic Services Compare?” Ecological Economics 189: 107152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon, B. 2011. “The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon era.” Journal of European Social Policy 21 (5): 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711418856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. F. 2009. Semi-Citizenship in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, A., and A. Percy. 2020. The Case for Universal Basic Services. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff. 2014. Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2014. “The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective.” In Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Defourny, L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff, 42–65. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2021. Social Enterprise in Western Europe: Theory, Models and Practice. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dufays, F., N. O’Shea, B. Huybrechts, et al. 2020. “Resisting Colonization: Worker Cooperatives’ Conceptualization and Behaviour in a Habermasian Perspective.” Work, Employment and Society 34 (6): 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019895936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., and J. Glover. 2001. “Risk, Citizenship and Welfare: Introduction.” In Risk and Citizenship: Key Issues in Welfare, edited by R. Edwards and J. Glover, 1–18. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, T., C. Grages, and B. Pfau-Effinger. 2019. “Self-Responsibility of the “Active Social Citizen”: Different Types of the Policy Concept of “Active Social Citizenship” in Different Types of Welfare States.” American Behavioral Scientist 63 (1): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218816803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, S., and J.-P. Gagnon. 2014. “The Crisis of Democracy, Which Crisis? Which Democracy?” Democratic Theory 1 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2014.010201.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2021. “Building an Economy that Works for People: An Action Plan for the Social Economy.”
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., and A. M. Guillemard. 2013. Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., and J. L. Laville. 2004. The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. 2009. “Is Inequality a Threat to Democracy.” In The Unsustainable American State, edited by J. Lawrence and D. King, 34–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. 2008. “Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles.” Basic Income Studies 3 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1134.
   Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A., and L. Herzog. 2016. “The Goods of Work (Other Than Money!).” Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (1): 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, I. 2019. “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework.” The Political Quarterly 90: 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12706.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. 2020. “The Case for Universal Basic Services.” LSE Public Policy Review 1 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.12.
   Google Scholar
• Goul Andersen, J., A. M. Guillemard, P. H. Jensen, et al. 2005. The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, A. 2016. “The Limits of a Basic Income: Means and Ends of Workplace Democracy.” Basic Income Studies 11 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haagh, L. 2011. “Basic Income, Social Democracy and Control Over Time.” Policy & Politics 39 (1): 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557311X546316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R., B. Hvinden, J. B. Brown, et al. 2018. “Changing Opportunites for Active Citizenship.” In Understanding the Lived Experiences of Persons with Disabilities in Nine Countries: Active Citizenship and Disability in Europe, edited by R. Halvorsen, B. Hvinden, J. B. Brown, et al., Vol. 2, 1–16. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. 2017. “Social Investment and its Critics.” In The Uses of Social Investment, edited by A. Hemerijck, 3–39. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., and A. W. Dzur. 2022. “Citizens’ Governance Spaces: Democratic Action Through Disruptive Collective Problem-Solving.” Political Studies 70 (3): 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720980902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B., and R. Halvorsen. 2018. “Mediating Agency and Structure in Sociology: What Role for Conversion Factors?” Critical Sociology 44 (6): 865–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516684541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. 2009. “Citizenship in Flux: The Figure of the Activist Citizen.” Subjectivity 29 (1): 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.25.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., and P. K. Wood. 1999. Citizenship and Identity. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. 2009. “Lost in Translation: The Social Investment Perspective and Gender Equality.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 16 (4): 446–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp019.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., and B. Hvinden. 2007. “What Do We Mean by Active Citizenship?” In Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States: Dynamics of Choice, Duties and Participation In a Changing Europe, edited by B. Hvinden and H. Johansson, 32–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., and B. Hvinden. 2013. “Towards a Post-Marshallian Framework for the Analysis of Social Citizenship.” In Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape, edited by A. Evers and A. M. Guillemard, 35–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A. 1995. “Active Citizenship and Local Governance: Political and Geographical Dimensions.” Political Geography 14 (2): 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)91662-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, R., and M. Sépulchre. 2016. “Active Citizenship for Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities in Sweden.” Alter 10 (2): 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 2007. “Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential1.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020601099856.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 2013. “Social Citizenship in New Labour’s New ‘Active’ Welfare State: The Case of the United Kingdom.” In Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape, edited by A. Evers and A. M. Guillemard, 121–149. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Malleson, T. 2014. After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannevuo, M. 2019. “Neuroliberalism in Action: The Finnish Experiment with Basic Income.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (4): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419834066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. 1963 [1950]. Citizenship and Social Class. Class, Citizenship and Social Development, 71–134. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, K. 2017. “Current Basic Income Experiments (and Those so Called): An Overview.” Basic Income News, BIEN. http://basicincome.org/news/2017/05/basic-income-experiments-and-those-so-called-early-2017-updates/.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel, N. 2015. “Servants for the Knowledge-Based Economy? The Political Economy of Domestic Services in Europe.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22 (2): 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv006.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N., B. Palier, and J. Palme. 2012. “Beyond the Welfare State as we Know it?” In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?: Ideas, Policies and Challenges, edited by N. Morel, B. Palier, and J. Palme, 1–30. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and O. Ailenei. 2005. “Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2037–2053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and E. H. Tonkens. 2011. Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyssens, M. 2014. “European Work Integration Social Enterprises.” In Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Defourny, L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff, 211–230. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. “Social Economy and the COVID-19 Crisis: Current and Future Roles.”
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, P., and M. O’Shaughnessy. 2021. “Social Enterprise in Ireland: State Support Key to the Predominance of Work-Integration Social Enterprise (WISE).” In Social Enterprise in Western Europe: Theory, Models and Practice, edited by J. Defourny and M. Nyssens, 112–130. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 2004. “Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of a Basic Income.” Politics & Society 32 (1): 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329203261100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau-Effinger, B., et al. 2005. “New Forms of Citizenship and Social Integration in European Societies.” In The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective, edited by Goul Andersen, J. Guillemard, A. M. Jensen, and P. H, 189–204. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2013. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, J., H. Reed, and A. Percy. 2017. Social Prosperity for the Future: A Proposal for Universal Basic Services. London: Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2001. “Will a Basic Income Do Justice to Women?” A Contribution to the Symposium on P. Van Parijs’s “Real Freedom for All” in Analyse & Kritik 22(2) 23 (1): 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2001-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. 2017. “Family Relationships and Gender Equality in the Social Investment Discourse: An Overly Reductive View?” In The Uses of Social Investment, edited by A. Hemerijck, First ed., 59–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J. 2019. Welfare State and the Democractic Citizen. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, J., T. Kay, and M. Ganz. 2019. “Social Entrepreneurship as Field Encroachment: How a Neoliberal Social Movement Constructed a New Field.” Socio-Economic Review 17 (1): 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2017. Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tondani, D. 2009. “Universal Basic Income and Negative Income tax: Two Different Ways of Thinking Redistribution.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (2): 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 1990. “Outline of a Theory of Citizenship.” Sociology 24 (2): 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024002002.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2001. “The Erosion of Citizenship.” The British Journal of Sociology 52 (2): 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120044944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Veen, R. J., and P. Van Parijs. 1986. “A Capitalist Road to Communism.” Theory and Society 15 (5): 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P., and Y. Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Jacobi, N., A. Nicholls, and E. Chiappero-Martinetti. 2017. “Theorizing Social Innovation to Address Marginalization.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 8 (3): 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2017.1380340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ravensburg, N. G., G. Mildenberger, and G. Krlev. 2021. “How Context Shapes the Character of Cooperative Social Enterprises: Insights from Various Countires.” In Social Enterprise in Western Europe: Theory, Models and Practice, edited by J. Defourny and M. Nyssens, 316–332. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. 2015. “Basic Capital in the Egalitarian Toolkit?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4): 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K. 2005. “A Failure to Communicate: What (if Anything) Can we Learn from the Negative Income tax Experiments?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 34 (1): 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.050.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. 1999. “Good-enough Principles for Welfare.” Journal of Social Policy 28 (4): 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279499005760.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2004. “Basic Income, Stakeholder Grants, and Class Analysis.” Politics & Society 32 (1): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329203261099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2006. “Compass Points. Towards a Socialist Alternative.” New Left Review 41: 93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar