At the origins of a tenacious narrative: Jacob Thomasius and the history of double truth

Bibliography

• Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Hofmann-Streit: Il dibattito sul rapporto tra filosofia e teologia all’università di Helmstedt”. Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 88, no. 3 (1996): 390–420.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. Censure et liberté intellectuelle à l’Université de Paris (XIII^e–XIV^e siècles). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. “Gli aristotelismi della scolastica”. In Le verità dissonanti: Aristotele alla fine del Medioevo, by Luca Bianchi and Eugenio Randi, 3–31. Rome: Laterza, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. “Gli articoli censurati nel 1241/1244 e la loro influenza da Bonaventura a Gerson”. In Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne († 1249), edited by Franco Morenzoni and Jean-Yves Tilliette, 155–171. Turnhout: Brepols, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. Pour une histoire de la “double vérité”. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. Studi sull’aristotelismo del Rinascimento. Padua: Poligrafo, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. Il vescovo e i filosofi: La condanna parigina del 1277 e l’evoluzione dell’aristotelismo scolastico. Bergamo: Pierluigi Lubrina Editore, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. “Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance”. Isis 91, no. 1 (2000): 32–58. doi: 10.1086/384625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, Paul Richard. Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brogi, Stefano. “La teologia di Simonide: Bayle e la ‘doppia verità’”. In Segni e percorsi della modernità: Saggi in onore di Paolo Rossi, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala, 43–75. Arezzo: Università degli Studi di Siena, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Brożek, Bartosz. The Double Truth Controversy: An Analytical Essay. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brucker, Jacob. Historia critica philosophiae a tempore resuscitarum in occidente literarum ad nostra tempora. Pars I. Vol. 4/1 of Historia critica philosophiae a mundi incunabulis ad nostram usque aetatem deducta. 2nd ed.. 4 vols. Leipzig: Impensis Haered. Weidemanni et Reichii, 1766–1767.
   Google Scholar
• Calov, Abraham. De natura theologiae, religione, revelatione divina, Scriptura S. & articulis fidei in genere [ … ]. Vol. 1 of Systema locorum theologicorum. 12 vols. Wittenberg: Sumptibus Andreae Harmanni, Typis Johannis Röhneri, 1655–1677.
   Google Scholar
• Calov, Abraham. Solida discussio scandalosi tractatus D. Christiani Drejeri: quo [ … ] Sanctissimum Deum nostrum [ … ] causam per accidens facere impio molitur ausu [ … ]. Wittenberg: Typis Jobi Wilhelmi Fincelii, Sumptibus Heredum Doct: Tobiae Mevii, & Elerdi Schumachers, 1654.
   Google Scholar
• Cappiello, Annalisa, and Marco Lamanna. “Il principio dell’unicità del vero dalla bolla Apostolici regiminis (1513) alla Rivoluzione scientifica”. Quaestio 14 (2014): 229–256. doi: 10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.103614
   Google Scholar
• Casalini, Cristiano, and Christoph Sander. “Benet Perera’s Pious Humanism: Aristotelianism, Philology, and Education in Jesuit Colleges. An Edition of Perera’s Documenta quaedam perutilia”. History of Universities 30, no. 1–2 (2017): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Casmann, Otto. Cosmopoeia et οὐρανογραϕία christiana. Frankfurt: Apud. M. Zachariam Palthenium, 1598.
   Google Scholar
• Casmann, Otto. Philosophiae et christianae et verae adversus insanos hostium eius, & nonnullorum hierophantarum morsus & calumnias modesta assertio. Frankfurt: E Collegio Musarum Nouenarum Palthenii, 1601.
   Google Scholar
• Collectio errorum in Anglia et Parisius condemnatorum. In Textus Sententiarum [ … ], by Petrus Lombardus, P1r–Q6v. Basel: Kessler, 1502.
   Google Scholar
• Crell, Fortunatus. De eucharistia libri duo. Heidelberg: Typis Abrahami Smesmanni, 1590.
   Google Scholar
• Denifle, Heinrich, ed. Ab anno MCC usque ad annum MCCLXXXVI. Vol. 1 of Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis. 4 vols. Paris: Ex typis Fratrum Delalain, 1889–1897.
   Google Scholar
• Forshaw, Peter. “Casmann, Otto”. In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, edited by Marco Sgarbi. Cham, ZG: Springer, 2017. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1161-1.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Günter. Die Vernunft des Gottesgedankens: Religionsphilosophische Studien zur frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Markus. “Der Export des Helmstedter Hofmannstreites ins Erzstift Magdeburg (1600–1630): Johannes Olearius, Sigismund Evenius, Andreas Cramer”. In Bildung und städtische Gesellschaft: Beiträge zur hallischen Bildungsgeschichte, edited by Thomas Müller-Bahlke, 36–53. 2nd ed. Halle: mdv Mitteldeutscher Verlag, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Markus. Die Grenzen der Vernunft. Theologie, Philosophie und gelehrte Konflikte am Beispiel des Helmstedter Hofmannstreits und seiner Wirkungen auf das Luthertum um 1600. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, Jean. “Epistola laudans mellifluam et igneam domini Bonauenture doctrinam”. In Vol. 1 of Opera, bb2vP–bb3vR. 4 vols. Basel: Adam Petri, 1517–1518.
   Google Scholar
• Gierl, Martin, Herbert Jaumann, and Walter Sparn. “Einleitung”. In Philosophia practica. Vol. 1 of Gesammelte Schriften, by Jacob Thomasius, edited by Walter Sparn, 1–22. 7 vols. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann, 2003–2009. Facsimile of Leipzig, 1676–1693.
   Google Scholar
• Goclenius, Rudolph. Isagoge in Peripateticorum et Scholasticorum primam philosophiam, quae dici consueuit metaphysica. Frankfurt: Ex officina M. Zachariae Palthenii, 1598.
   Google Scholar
• Headley, John. “Luther and the Fifth Lateran Council”. Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 63 (1972): 55–78.
   Google Scholar
• Heßbrüggen-Walter, Stefan. “Defining Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (IV): ‘Wisdom of the Flesh’ and Philosophers as ‘Patriarchs of Heresy’? Casmann and the Hofmann Dispute”. Early Modern Thought Online. Accessed May 17, 2017. http://emto.tumblr.com/post/52467573838/defining-philosophy-in-early-modern-germany-iv.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Daniel. Pro duplici veritate Lutheri a philosophis impugnata [ … ] disputatio. Magdeburg: Excudebat Andreas Dunckerus, 1600.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Daniel, and (resp.) Caspar Pfaffrad. Propositiones de Deo, et Christi tum persona tum officio [ … ]. Helmstedt: Excudebant haeredes Iacobi Lucij, 1598.
   Google Scholar
• Hotson, Howard. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1543–1630. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jaumann, Herbert. “Thomasius, Jakob”. In Vol. 11 of Killy Literaturlexikon: Autoren und Werke des deutschsprachigen Kulturraumes, 506–509, edited by Wilhelm Kühlmann. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kesler, Andreas. Quadriga discursuum theologico-philosophicorum pro defendenda philosophi ac theologi Concordia [ … ]. Wittenberg: Typis & sumtibus Christiani Tham, 1624.
   Google Scholar
• Kusukawa, Sachiko. “Mediations of Zabarella in Northern Europe: The Preface of Johann Ludwig Hawenreuter”. In La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, edited by Gregorio Piaia, 199–213. Rome: Editrice Antenore, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kusukawa, Sachiko. “Uses of Philosophy in Reformation Thought: Melanchthon, Schegk, and Crellius”. In The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700, edited by Russell L. Friedman and Lauge O. Nielsen, 143–163. Dordrecht: Springer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lamanna, Marco. La nascita dell’ontologia nella metafisica di Rudolph Göckel (1547–1628). Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Landucci, Sergio. “Alla ricerca della ‘doppia verità’”. Rivista di storia della filosofia 1 (2017): 1–27. doi: 10.3280/SF2017-001001
   Google Scholar
• Landucci, Sergio. La doppia verità: Conflitti di ragione e fede tra Medioevo e prima modernità. Milan: Feltrinelli, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• “Lectori benevolo”. In Pro duplici veritate Lutheri a philosophis impugnata [ … ] disputatio, by Daniel Hofmann, A2r–v. Magdeburg: Excudebat Andreas Dunckerus, 1600.
   Google Scholar
• [Ledesma, Diego de], “Ad lectorem”. In Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in octo libros Aristotelis de physica auscultatione [ … ], by Franciscus Toletus , *2r–*4r. Cologne: Apud haeredes Arnoldi Birckmanni, 1579.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Brauns, Sicco. Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barock und Aufklärung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Leinsle, Ulrich Gottfried. Einführung in die scholastische Theologie. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schönigh, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, Charles. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors C”. Renaissance Quarterly 28, no. 4 (1975): 689–741. doi: 10.2307/2860175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, Mario. “Storia ‘critica’ della filosofia e primo illuminismo: Jakob Brucker”. In Dall’età cartesiana a Brucker, edited by Giovanni Santinello. Vol. 2 of Storia delle storie generali della filosofia, edited by Giovanni Santinello and Gregorio Piaia, 527–635. 5 vols. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola, 1979–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Martin. “Die Disputation de sententia: Verbum caro factum est (Joh. 1, 14)”. In Vol. 39/2 of Werke, edited by Heinrich Hermelink, 1–33. 109 vols. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau & Nachfolger, 1883–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, Inge. “Lutherische Theologie und aristotelische Philosophie an der Universität Helmstedt im 16. Jahrhundert: Zur Vorgeschichte des Hofmannschen Streites im Jahre 1598”. Jahrbuch der Gesellschaft für niedersächsische Kirchengeschichte 73 (1975): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnke, Dietrich. “Rektor Casmann in Stade, ein vergessener Gegner aristotelischer Philosophie und Naturwissenschaft im 16. Jahrhundert”. Archiv für die Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik 5, nos. 3–5 (1914): 183–197, 226–240, 352–363.
   Google Scholar
• Maywald, Max. Die Lehre von der zweifachen Wahrheit: Ein Versuch der Trennung von Theologie und Philosophie im Mittelalter; Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der scholastischen Philosophie. Berlin: F. Henschel, 1871.
   Google Scholar
• Meisner, Balthasar. Philosophia sobria, hoc est: Pia consideratio quaestionum philosophicarum, in controversijs theologicis, quas Calviniani moverunt Orthodoxis, subinde occurrentium. Vol. 1 of Philosophia sobria. 3 vols. Wittenberg: Typis Martini Henckelij, & Andreae Rüdingeri, 1611–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. “The Young Leibniz and His Teachers”. In The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646–1676), edited by Stuart Brown, 19–40. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Patrizi, Francesco. De Aristotelis vita, [ … ] sectatoribus, [ … ] sectis, philosophandi ratione. Vol. 1 of Discussiones Peripateticae. 4 vols. Basel: Ad Perneam Lecythum, 1581.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, Benet. De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principijs & affectionibus, libri quindecim. Rome: Impensis Venturini Tramezini, apud Franciscum Zanettum, & Bartholomaeum Tosium socios, 1576.
   Google Scholar
• Petrarca, Francesco. De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia. Edited by Pier Giorgio Ricci. In Prose, edited by Guido Martellotti, Pier Giorgio Ricci, Enrico Carrara, and Enrico Bianchi, 710–767. Milan: Riccardo Ricciardi Editore, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Piché, David. “Prolégomènes”. In La condamnation parisienne de 1277: Texte latin, traduction, introduction et commentaire, edited by David Piché, 15–70. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Quinto, Riccardo. Scholastica. Storia di un concetto. Padua: Poligrafo, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Radeva, Zornitsa. “From Reconstruction to Reformation: Jacob Thomasius’s Use of Aristotle in the Debate on the Origin of the Human Soul”. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 84, no. 2 (2017): 427–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roling, Bernd. “Saeculum barbaricum: Frühneuzeitliche Stereotypen in der Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung des Mittelalters”. Frühmittelalterliche Studien 49, no. 1 (2015): 275–297.
   Google Scholar
• Röser, Albert. “Otto Casmann und die Naturphilosophie”. In Porträts aus vier Jahrhunderten Arnoldinum Steinfurt, 1588–1988, edited by Albert Röser, 19–34. Steinfurt: Stadt Steinfurt, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Salatowsky, Sascha. Die Philosophie der Sozinianer: Transformationen zwischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus und Frühaufklärung. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, Christoph. “The War of the Roses: The Debate between Diego de Ledesma and Benet Perera about the Philosophy Course at the Jesuit College in Rome”. Quaestio 14 (2014): 31–50. doi: 10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.103606
   Google Scholar
• Santinello, Giovanni. “Jakob Thomasius (1622–1684)”. In Dalle origini rinascimentali alla “historia philosophica”, edited by Giovanni Santinello. Vol. 1 of Storia delle storie generali della filosofia, edited by Giovanni Santinello and Gregorio Piaia, 438–467. 5 vols. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola, 1979–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Santinello, Giovanni. “Jakob Thomasius e il medioevo”. Medioevo. Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale 4 (1978): 173–216.
   Google Scholar
• Santinello, Giovanni, and Gregorio Piaia, eds. Storia delle storie generali della filosofia. 5 vols. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola, 1979–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Scattola, Merio. “Gelehrte Philologie vs. Theologie: Johannes Caselius im Streit mit den Helmstedter Theologen”. In Die europäische Gelehrtenrepublik im Zeitalter des Konfessionalismus, edited by Herbert Jaumann, 155–181. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• “Schlüter (Gottfried) von Wesel”. In Vol. 35 of Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon, 254–255. 64 vols & 4 Supplementa. Halle: Johann Heinrich Zedler, 1731–1754.
   Google Scholar
• “Schlüter (Gottfried) des vorigen Sohn, zu Göttingen [ … ] gebohren”. In Vol. 35 of Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon, 255. 64 vols. & 4 Supplementa. Halle: Johann Heinrich Zedler, 1731–1754.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm, and Theo Stammen, eds. Jacob Brucker (1696–1770): Philosoph und Historiker der europäischen Aufklärung. Berlin: Akademie, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Charles B. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema, Donald. “Johann Jungnitz on the Use of Aristotelian Logic in Theology”. In Späthumanismus und reformierte Konfession: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Philosophie in Heidelberg an der Wende zum 17. Jahrhundert, edited by Christoph Strohm, Joseph S. Freedman, and Herman J. Selderhuis, 127–152. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Slevogt, Paul. Pervigilium de dissidio theologi et philosophi in utriusque principiis fundato. Jena?: Impressum Gansanii, 1623.
   Google Scholar
• Sparn, Walter. “Doppelte Wahrheit? Erinnerungen zur theologischen Struktur des Problems der Einheit des Denkens”. In Zugang zur Theologie: Fundamentaltheologische Beiträge; Winfried Joest zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Friedrich Mildenberger and Joachim Track, 53–78. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Sparn, Walter. “Die Schulphilosophie: Einleitung”. In Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Das Heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, edited by Helmut Holzhey and Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann. Vol. 4/1 of Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie (Ueberweg), edited by Helmut Holzhey, 293–294. 36 vols. Basel: Schwabe, 1983–.
   Google Scholar
• Sparn, Walter. “Die Schulphilosophie in den lutherischen Territorien”. In Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Das Heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, edited by Helmut Holzhey and Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann. Vol. 4/1 of Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie (Ueberweg), edited by Helmut Holzhey, 475–587. 36 vols. Basel: Schwabe, 1983–.
   Google Scholar
• Sparn, Walter. Wiederkehr der Metaphysik: Die ontologische Frage in der lutherischen Theologie des frühen 17. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Calwer, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Streiff, Stefan. “Novis linguis loqui”: Martin Luthers Disputation über Joh 1,14 “verbum caro factum est” aus dem Jahr 1539. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Taurellus, Nicolaus. Philosophiae triumphus, hoc est, metaphysica philosophandi methodus. Basel: per Sebastianum Henricpetri, 1573.
   Google Scholar
• Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb. Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. 8/2 of Geschichte der Philosophie. 11 vols. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1798–1811.
   Google Scholar
• Thijssen, J. M. M. H. “What Really Happened on 7 March 1277? Bishop Tempier’s Condemnation and Its Institutional Context”. In Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science, edited by Edith Sylla and Michael McVaugh, 84–114. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. “Ad lectorem benevolum praefatio autoris”. In Praefationes sub auspicia disputationum suarum in Academia Lipsiensi recitatae, argumenti varii, a4r–b1v. Leipzig: Typis Christophori Güntheri, 1681.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. Dilucidationes Stahlianae. Leipzig: Sumpt. Georg. Heinrici Fromanni, Literis Johannis Coleri, 1676.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. “Oratio XV. De syncretismo Peripatetico, habita A. 1664. d. 28. Januar. Cum candidatis XXV Magisterii conferenda esset supremi hujus in philosophia gradus licentia”. In Orationes, partim ex umbone templi academici, partim ex auditorii philosophici cathedra recitatae, argumenti varii, 323–349. Leipzig: Sumtibus Haeredum Friderici Lanckisii, Typis Christoph. Fleischeri, 1683.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. “Praefatio XLII. De duplici & contradictoria veritate. Praemissa Disputationi, habitae Anno 1663. d. 7. Februarii. An causa per accidens sit ex serie verarum causarum?” In Praefationes sub auspicia disputationum suarum in Academia Lipsiensi recitatae, argumenti varii, 237–246. Leipzig: Typis Christophori Güntheri, 1681.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. “Programma XXXIX. Adversus philosophos libertinos, praescriptum promulgationi lectionum publicarum Facultatis Philosophicae, Anno 1665, d. 4. Junii”. In Dissertationes LXIII, varii argumenti magnam partem ad historiam philosophicam & ecclesiasticam pertinentes, edited by Christian Thomasius, 437–451. Halle an der Saale: Impensis Johannis Friderici Zeitleri, 1693.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. Schediasma historicum, quo, occasione definitionis vetustae, qua philosophia dicitur γνῶσις τῶν ὄντων, varia discutiuntur ad historiam tum philosophicam, tum ecclesiasticam pertinentia. Leipzig: Sumptibus Philippi Fuhrmanni, Imprimebat Joh. Wittigau, 1665.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob. “Theologia scholastica et ejus initium”. In Vol. 3 of Historia sapientiae et stultitiae, edited by Christian Thomasius, 225–243. 3 vols. Halle an der Saale: Typis & Impensis Christophori Salfeldii, 1693.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, Jacob, and (resp.) Arnold Tölner. An causa per accidens sit ex serie verarum causarum? Leipzig: Typis Johannis Wittigau, 1663.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasoni, Francesco. Christian Thomasius: Geist und kulturelle Identität an der Schwelle zur europäischen Aufklärung. Münster: Waxmann, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tommasi, Francesco Valerio. “Protestantische Debatten um die Einheit der Wahrheit II: Der Hofmannsche Streit und die Schule von Altdorf”. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 64, no. 1 (2017): 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Van Steenberghen, Fernand. Introduction à l’étude de la philosophie médiévale. Louvain: Publications Universitaires, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• White, Graham. Luther as Nominalist: A Study of the Logical Methods Used in Martin Luther’s Disputations in the Light of Their Medieval Background. Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Society, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Zahnd, Ueli. “Protestantische Debatten um die Einheit der Wahrheit I: Luther, Melanchthon und Zwingli”. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 64, no. 1 (2017): 58–71.
   Google Scholar
• Zahnd, Ueli. “Sorbona mater errorum: Martin Luthers Irrtumsvorwurf an die Pariser Universität”. In Irrtum – Error – Erreur, edited by Andreas Speer and Maxime Mauriège, 457–473. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
   Google Scholar