Francesco Patrizi da Cherso and the anti-Aristotelian tradition: interpreting the Discussiones Peripateticae (1581)

Bibliography

• Algra, Keimpe, and Ierodiakonou, Katerina, eds. Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Artese, Luciano. “Antonio Persio e la diffusione del ramismo in Italia.” Atti e memorie dell’accademia toscana di scienze e lettere La Colombaria 43 (1981): 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Backus, Irena. Life Writing in Reformation Europe: Lives of Reformers by Friends, Disciples and Foes. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Frederik, Bellis, Delphine, and Palmerino, Carla Rita, eds. Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tov, Asaph. “Philipp Melanchton’s De Aristotele (1544): Biography as a Pedagogical Argument.” In Biography, Historiography, and Modes of Philosophizing. The Tradition of Collective Biography in Early Modern Europe, edited by Patrick Bakker, 251–266. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Luca. “Per una storia dell’aristotelismo ‘volgare’ nel Rinascimento: problemi e prospettive di ricerca.” Bruniana & Campanelliana 15 (2009): 367–385.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. “Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance.” Isis 91 (2000): 32–58. doi: 10.1086/384625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, Paul Richard. Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bonazzi, Mauro. “Eudorus of Alexandria and the ‘Pythagorean’ Pseudepigrapha.” In On Pythagoreanism, edited by Gabriele Cornelli, Richard D. McKirahan, and Constantinos Macris, 385–404. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bragagnolo, Manuela. “Geografia e politica nel Cinquecento. La descrizione di città nelle carte di Gian Vincenzo Pinelli.” Laboratoire italien 8 (2008): 163–193. doi: 10.4000/laboratoireitalien.74
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, Benedetto. “Critice in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries and the Rise of the Notion of Historical Criticism.” In History of Scholarship, edited by Christopher Ligota and Jean-Louis Quantin, 135–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Casalini, Cristiano, and Sander, Christoph. “Benet Perera’s Pious Humanism: Aristotelianism, Philology, and Education in Jesuit Colleges. An Edition of Perera’s Documenta quaedam perutilia.” History of Universities 30, no 1–2 (2017): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Case, John. Sphaera civitatis. Frankfurt: apud Ioannem Wechelum, 1589.
   Google Scholar
• Centrone, Bruno. “The Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings.” In A History of Pythagoreanism, edited by Carl A. Huffman, 315–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaradonna, Riccardo. “Autour d’Eudore: les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans le moyen platonisme.” In The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts, edited by Mauro Bonazzi and Jan Opsomer, 89–111. Leuven: Peeters, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Conring, Hermann. De Hermetica Aegyptiorum vetere et Paracelsicorum Nova medicina. Helmstadt: Richterus, 1648.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, Luc. “Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic.” Vivarium 45, no. 1 (2007): 113–124. doi: 10.1163/156853407X202539
   Google Scholar
• Dietze-Mager, Gertrud. “Die Pinakes des Andronikos im Licht der Vorrede in der Aristoteles-Schrift des Ptolemaios.” Aevum 89, no. 1 (2015): 93–123.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, Sten. “Philoponus, ‘Alexander’ and the Origins of Medieval Logic.” In Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, edited by Richard Sorabji, 445–461. London: Duckworth, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Falcon, Andrea. Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Falcon, Andrea. “Aristotle and the Study of Animals and Plants.” In Frontiers of Ancient Science. Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, edited by Brooke Holmes and Klaus-Dietrich Fischer, 75–91. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, James Dougal. The Invention of Discovery, 1500–1700. London; New York: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Daniel. “Telesio among the Novatores: Telesio’s Reception in the Seventeenth Century.” In Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy, edited by Cecilia Muratori and Gianna Paganini, 119–134. Cham: Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, Hans. “Continuity and Change in Aristotelianism.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41 (1997): 109–115. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-5370.1997.tb02265.x
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gulizia, Stefano. “First Notes on Francesco Patrizi's Methods of Argumentation.” In Francesco Patrizi Philosopher of the Renaissance, edited by T. Nejeschleba and R. Blum, 118–142. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackeho, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzimichali, Myrto. “Pseudo-Archytas and the Categories.” In Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Jenny Bryan, Robert Wardy, and James Warren, 162–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, Carl. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Katinis, Teodoro. Sperone Speroni and the Debate Over Sophistry in the Italian Renaissance. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited by Leroy E. Loemker. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Leijenhorst, Cees. “Patrizi’s Hermetic Philosophy.” In Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times, edited by Roelof van den Broek and Wouter Hanegraaff, 125–147. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Leinkauf, Thomas. “Francesco Patrizi (1529–1597): New Philosophies of History, Poetry, and the World.” In Philosophers of the Renaissance, edited by Paul Richard Blum, 205–218. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, Dmitri. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science. Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ligota, Christopher R. “Annius of Viterbo and Historical Method.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 50 (1987): 44–56. doi: 10.2307/751317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolordo, Antonia. Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfeld, Jaap. “De Melisso Xenophane Gorgia: Pyrrhonizing Aristotelianism.” Rheinisches Museum 131 (1988): 239–276.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfeld, Jaap. “Diaphonia: The Argument of Alexander De fato, Chs. 1–2.” Phronesis 33 (1988): 182–208. doi: 10.1163/156852888X00144
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Craig. Subverting Aristotle. Religion, History, and Philosophy in Early Modern Science. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Robert, ed. The Aristotelian Problemata Physica. Philosophical and Scientific Investigations. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Monfasani, John. Nicolaus Scutellius, O.S.A., as Pseudo-Pletho: The Sixteenth-Century Treatise Pletho in Aristotelem and the Scribe Michael Martinus Stella. Florence: Olschki, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Muccillo, Maria. “Dall’ordine dei libri all’ordine della realtà: ordine e metodo nella filosofia di Francesco Patrizi.” In Francesco Patrizi: Philosopher of the Renaissance, edited by Tomas Nejeschleba and Paul Richard Blum, 9–61. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Muccillo, Maria. “La libreria greca di Francesco Patrizi.” In Bibliotechae selectae, edited by Eugenio Canone, 73–118. Florence: Olschki, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Muccillo, Maria. “La storia della filosofia presocratica nelle “Discussiones peripateticae” di Francesco Patrizi da Cherso.” La Cultura 13 (1975): 48–105.
   Google Scholar
• Muccillo, Maria. Platonismo, ermetismo e “prisca theologia”. Ricerche di storiografia filosofica rinascimentale. Florence: Olschki, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mulsow, Martin. Das Ende des Hermetismus: Historische Kritik und Neue Naturphilosophie in der Spätrenaissance. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nejeschleba, Tomas. “Johannes Jessenius, between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi’s Philosophy.” In Francesco Patrizi: Philosopher of the Renaissance, edited by Tomas Nejeschleba and Paul Richard Blum, 359–369. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou-Konnari, Angel. “Patrizi’s Cypriot Connections and Jason and Pietro de Nores.” In Cyprus and the Renaissance (1450–1650) [Mediterranean Nexus, 1110–1700. Conflict, Influence and Inspiration in the Mediterranean Area], edited by Benjamin Arbel, Evelien Chayes, and Harald Hendrix, 157–203. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Oldrini, Guido. La disputa del metodo nel Rinascimento. Indagini su Ramo e sul ramismo. Florence: Le Lettere, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, Margherita. “Books on the Run: The Case of Francesco Patrizi.” In Fruits of Migration. Heterodox Italian Migrants and Central European Culture, 1550–1620, edited by Cornel Zwierlein and Vincenzo Lavenia, 45–71. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Patrizi, Francesco. Discussionum Peripateticarum tomi quattuor, quibus Aristotelicae philosophiae universa historia atque dogmata cum veterum placitis collata, eleganter ac erudite declarantur. Basle: ad Perneam Lecythum, 1581.
   Google Scholar
• Patrizi, Francesco. Nova de universis philosophia: materiali per una edizione emendata. Edited by Anna Laura Puliafito Bleuel. Florence: Olschki, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Perini, Leandro. La vita e i tempi di Pietro Perna. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pomata, Gianna, and Siraisi, Nancy, eds. Historia. Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Puliafito, Anna Laura. “Searching for a New Physics: Metaphysics of Light and Ancient Knowledge in Francesco Patrizi da Cherso.” In Magia, alchimia, scienza dal ‘400 al ‘700. L’influsso di Ermete Trismegisto/Magic, Alchemy, Science, 15th–18th Centuries. The Influence of Hermes Trismegistus, vol. 2, edited by Carlos Gilly and Cis van Heertum, 255–267. Florence: Centro Di, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Eileen. Painting the Heavens: Art and Science in the Age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Refini, Eugenio. The Vernacular Aristotle: Translation as Reception in Medieval and Renaissance Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Valentin. Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus. Leipzig: Teubner, 1863.
   Google Scholar
• Santinello, Giovanni and Blackwell, C. W. eds. Models of the History of Philosophy: From its Origins in the Renaissance to the ‘Historia Philosophica’. Dordrecht: Springer, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Charles B. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sgarbi, Marco. The Italian Mind. Vernacular Logic in Renaissance Italy (1540–1551). Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Siraisi, Nancy. “In Search of the Origins of Medicine: Egyptian Medicine and Paduan Physicians.” In Inventing Genealogies, edited by Valeria Finucci and Kevin Brownlee, 235–261. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, Daniel. Egyptian Oedipus: Athanasius Kircher and the Secrets of Antiquity. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sytsma, David S. Richard Baxter and the Mechanical Philosophers. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tugnoli Pattaro, Sandra. Metodo e sistema delle scienze nel pensiero di Aldrovandi. Bologna: CLUEB, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Tuominen, Miira, Hienämaa, Sara, and Mäkinen, Virpi, eds. New Perspectives on Aristotelianism and Its Critics. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tutino, Stefania. Shadows of Doubt: Language and Truth in Post-Reformation Catholic Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Valla, Lorenzo. Dialectical Disputations. Edited and translated by Brian Copenhaver and Lodi Nauta. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, Roelof, and Hanegraaff, Wouter, eds. Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeir, Koen, and Regier, Jonathan, eds. Boundaries, Extents and Circulations: Space and Spatiality in Early Modern Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, Nick. Galileo’s Idol: Gianfrancesco Sagredo and the Politics of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Steven J. “Defining the Corpus Aristotelicum: Scholastic Awareness of Aristotelian Spuria in the High Middle Ages.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 58 (1995): 29–51. doi: 10.2307/751503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, Michael. “‘Aristoteles exotericus, acroamaticus mysticus’: Two Interpretations of the Typological Classification of the ‘Corpus Aristotelicum’ by Francesco Patrizi da Cherso.” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 2 (1985): 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Christopher S. Forgery, Replica, Fiction: Temporalities of German Renaissance Art. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar