Scottish Common Sense, association of ideas and free will

Bibliography

• Allen, Richard C. David Hartley on Human Nature. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, Maria. “Reid, Agent Causation and Volitionism.” Reid Studies 3, no. 1 (2000): 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Barresi, J., and R. Martin. Naturalization of the Soul: Self and Personal Identity in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Benbaji, Hagit. “Reid on Causation and Action.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 1, no. 1 (2003): 1–19. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2003.1.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Broadie, Alexander. “The Human Mind and its Powers.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Alexander Broadie, 60–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Broadie, Alexander. “Reid in Context.” In The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid, edited by Terence Cuneo, and René Van Woudenberg, 31–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Callergård, Robert. “The Hypothesis of Ether and Reid’s Interpretation of Newton’s First Rule of Philosophizing.” Synthese 120, no. 1 (1999): 19–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1005250302365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuneo, Terence. “Reid’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid, edited by Terence Cuneo, and René Van Woudenberg, 243–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• De Bary, Philip. Thomas Reid and Scepticism: His Reliabilist Response. New York: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dybikowski, James. “Joseph Priestley, Metaphysicians and Philosopher of Religion.” In Joseph Priestley, Scientist, Philosopher, and Theologian, edited by Isabel Rivers, and David L. Wykes, 80–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fruchtman, Jack Jr. “Common Sense and the Association of Ideas; the Priestley-Reid Controversy.” In The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, edited by Melvin Dalgarno, and Eric Matthews, 421–432. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Aaron. “In Defense of Elephants: Priestley on Reid on How to be a Newtonian of the Mind.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 2, no. 2 (2004): 137–153. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2004.2.2.137
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Aaron. “Mind and Matter.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, edited by James A. Harris, 171–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Giuntini, Chiara. La chimica della mente: Associazione delle idee e scienza della natura umana da Locke a Spencer. Firenze: Le Lettere, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, Robert B., and Hugh W. Buckingham. “David Hartley’s Neural Vibrations and Psychological Associations.” In Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays on Eighteenth-Century Neuroscience, edited by Harry Whitaker, C. U. M. Smith, and Stanley Finger, 177–190. New York: Springer, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Sean. “Liberty and Necessity.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, edited by James A. Harris, 248–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, James A. “Reid’s Challenge to Reductionism about Human Agency.” Reid Studies 4, no. 2 (2001): 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, James A. “Joseph Priestley and ‘the Proper Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity’.” Enlightenment and Dissent 20 (2001): 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, James A. “On Reid’s ‘Inconsistent Triad’: A Reply to McDermid.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11, no. 1 (2003): 121–127. doi: 10.1080/0960878032000058491
   Google Scholar
• Harris, James A. Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary. “Remaking the Science of Mind: Psychology as Natural Science.” In Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth Century Domains, edited by Christopher Fox, Roy Porter, and Robert Wokler, 184–231. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hellewell, Jamie S. “Thomas Reid on Physical Causation.” Journal of Scottish Thought 3 (2010): 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. 3 vols. London: John Noon, 1739-40. Reprinted and edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007. Page references are to the 2007 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Huoranszki, Ferenc. “Common Sense and the Theory of Human Behaviour.” The Philosophical Quarterly 52, no. 209 (2002): 526–543. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Keith. Thomas Reid. London: Routledge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Levi Mortera, Emanuele. “Reid, Stewart and the Association of Ideas.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3, no. 2 (2005): 157–170. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2005.3.2.157
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Chris. “Reid on Scepticism about Agency and the Self.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3, no. 1 (2005): 19–33. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2005.3.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Madden, Edward H. “Commonsense and Agency Theory.” Review of Metaphysics 36, no. 2 (1983): 319–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermid, Douglas. “Thomas Reid on Moral Liberty and Common Sense.” Review of Metaphysics 36, no. 2 (1999): 275–303.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, John G. “Joseph Priestley, ‘Aerial Philosopher’: Metaphysics and Methodology in Priestley’s Chemical Thought, from 1762 to 1781. Part IV.” Ambix 26, no. 1 (1979): 16–38. doi: 10.1179/amb.1979.26.1.16
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, John G., and James E. McGuire. “God and Nature: Priestley’s Way of Rational Dissent.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 6 (1975): 325–404. doi: 10.2307/27757344
   Google Scholar
• Mishori, Daniel. “The Dilemmas of the Dual Channel: Reid on Consciousness and Reflection.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 1, no. 2 (2003): 141–155. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2003.1.2.141
   Google Scholar
• Mudroch, Vilem. “Joseph Priestley’s Eclectic Epistemology.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2005): 49–71.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Timothy. “Thomas Reid on Free Agency.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32, no. 4 (1994): 605–622. doi: 10.1353/hph.1994.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, Richard H. “Joseph Priestley’s Criticisms of David Hume’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15, no. 4 (1977): 437–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. An Examination of Dr. Reid’s Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, Dr. Beattie’s Essay on the Nature and Immortality of Truth, Dr. Oswald’s Appeal to Common Sense in Behalf of Religion. London: J. Johnson, 1774.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. Hartley’s Theory of the Human Mind on the Principles of the Association of Ideas. London: J. Johnson, 1775.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. A Free Discussion of the Doctrines of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity, in a Correspondence between Dr. Price, and Dr. Priestley. London: J. Johnson, 1778.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. Letters to a Philosophical Unibeliever. London: J. Johnson, 1780.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit and The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity Illustrated. 2 vols. 2nd ed. Birmingham: Pearson and Rollason, 1782.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Reid. Edited by Sir William Hamilton. 2 vols. Edinburgh: Maclachlan and Stewart, 1872.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. Thomas Reid on the Animate Creation: Papers Relating to the Life Sciences. Edited by Paul B. Wood. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh: A. Kincaid & J. Bell, 1764. Reprinted and edited by Derek R. Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997. Page references are to the 1997 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: John Bell, 1785. Reprinted and edited by Derek R. Brookes and Knud Haakonssen. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002. Page references are to the 2002 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. The Correspondence of Thomas Reid. Edited by Paul B. Wood. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Active Powers of Man. Edinburgh: John Bell. Reprinted and edited by Knud Haakonssen and James A. Harris. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. Page references are to the 2010 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, William. Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rysiew, Patrick. “Reid and Epistemic Naturalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 52, no. 209 (2002): 437–456. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneewind, Jerome B. “The Active Powers.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonssen, 557–607. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, Robert. The Enlightened Joseph Priestley: A Study of his Life and Work from 1773 to 1804. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stalley, Richard F. “Causality and Agency in the Philosophy of Thomas Reid.” In The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, edited by Melvin Dalgarno, and Eric Matthews, 275–284. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, Robert. “Thomas Reid’s Philosophy of Action.” Philosophical Studies 66, no. 2 (1992): 197–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00646272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapper, Alan. “Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind.” The Philosophical Quarterly 52, no. 209 (2002): 511–525. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cleve, James. Problems from Reid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Van Woudenberg, René. “Thomas Reid on Determinism.” In Reid on Ethics, edited by Sabine Roeser, 123–142. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, Fernando. The Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Wes. “The Vibrating Nerve Impulse in Newton, Willis, and Gassendi: First Steps in a Mechanical Theory of Communication.” Brain and Cognition 51, no. 1 (2003): 66–94. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00513-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, Jerome A. “Reid’s Definition of Freedom.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13, no. 3 (1975): 335–345. doi: 10.1353/hph.2008.0267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Charles T. “On the Role of Newtonian Analogies in Eighteenth-Century Life Science: Vitalism and Provisionally Inexplicable Explicative Devices.” In Newton and Empiricism, edited by Zvi Biener, and Eric Schliesser, 223–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Paul B. “Reid on Hypotheses and the Ether: a Reassessment.” In The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, edited by Melvin Dalgarno, and Eric Matthews, 433–446. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Paul B. “Hume, Reid and the Science of the Mind.” In Hume and Hume’s Connexions, edited by M. A. Stewart, and J. P. Wright, 119–139. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yaffe, Gideon. Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid’s Theory of Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar