The art of trascegliere e notare in early modern Italian culture

Bibliography

• Arato, Franco. “Un erudito barocco: Secondo Lancellotti.” Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 172, no. 560 (1995): 509–549.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. On Memory and Reminiscence. Vol. 1 of The Works of Aristotle, 690–695. Chicago: William Benton/Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis. The Two Books of the Proficience and Advancement of Learning, Divine and Humane. London: Henry Tomes, 1605.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. “L'ancienne Rhétorique [Aide-Mémoire].” Communications 16 (1970): 172–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1970.1236
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli, Daniello. Dell’huomo di lettere difeso et emendato. Rome: Francesco Corbelletti, 1645.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti, Eugenio, and Giuseppa Saccaro Battisti. Le macchine cifrate di Giovanni Fontana. Milan: Arcadia Edizioni, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, Peter. “Notions in Garrison: The Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book.” In New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, edited by W. Speed Hill, 131–147. Binghamton, NY: Renaissance English Text Society, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, Johann Friedrich. Discours von der Klugheit zu excerpiren. Braunschweig: Renger, 1727.
   Google Scholar
• Bisello, Linda. Medicina della memoria. Aforistica ed esemplarità nella scrittura barocca. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. “Le florilège latin comme point de comparaison.” In Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident, hors série, Qu’était-ce qu’écrire une encyclopédie en Chine?, edited by Florence Bretelle-Establet, and Karine Chemla, 185–204. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. “The Rise of Note-Taking in Early Modern Europe.” Intellectual History Review 20, no. 3 (2010): 303–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2010.492611
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know. Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzoni, Lina. La stanza della memoria. Modelli letterari e iconografici nell’età della stampa. Turin: Einaudi, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cancellieri, Francesco. Dissertazione intorno agli uomini dotati di gran memoria ed a quelli divenuti smemorati. Rome: Presso Francesco Bourlie, 1815.
   Google Scholar
• Cardano, Gerolamo. De subtilitate libri XXI. Orig. ed. 1550. Basel: Per Sebastianum Henricpetri, 1611.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, Mary. “Ars oblivionalis, ars inveniendi: The Cherub Figure and the Art of Memory.” Gesta 48, no. 2 (2009): 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/29764902
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, Mary. The Craft of Thought. Meditation, Rhetoric and the Making of Images, 400-1200. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Carsughi, Ranieri. Ars bene scribendi studiosis rhetoricae adolescentibus proposita olim in Collegio Romano. Rome: Ex Typographia Antonii de Rubeis, 1709.
   Google Scholar
• Cevolini, Alberto, ed. Forgetting Machines. Knowledge Management Evolution in Early Modern Europe. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cevolini, Alberto. “Indexing as Preadaptive Advance: A Socio-Evolutionary Perspective.” The Indexer 32, no. 2 (2014): 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cevolini, Alberto. “Verzetteln lernen. Gelehrsamkeit als Medium des Wissens in der frühen Neuzeit.” Soziale Systeme 10, no. 2 (2004): 233–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2004-0205
   Google Scholar
• Cevolini, Alberto. De arte excerpendi. Imparare a dimenticare nella prima modernità. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cherchi, Paolo. “La selva rinascimentale: profilo di un genere.” In Ricerche sulle selve rinascimentali, edited by Paolo Cherchi, 9–41. Ravenna: Longo, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cochetti, Maria. “Teoria e costruzione degli indici secondo Conrad Gessner.” Il Bibliotecario 1-2 (1984): 25–32; 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Décultot, Élisabeth, ed. Lire, copier, écrire. Les Bibliothèques manuscrites et leurs usages au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. Regulae ad directionem ingenii. In Œuvres de Descartes, edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Léopold Cerf, 1908.
   Google Scholar
• Dohrn, Anton. Der Ursprung der Wirbelthiere und das Princip des Functionswechsels. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1875.
   Google Scholar
• Drexel, Jeremias. Aurifodina Artium et Scientiarum omnium; Excerpendi Sollertia, Omnibus litterarum amantibus monstrata. Antwerp: Apud Viduam Ioannis Cnobbari, 1638.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto, and Marilyn Migiel. “An Ars Oblivionalis? Forget It!” PMLA 103, no. 3 (1988): 254–261.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, Elena. Soziales Vergessen: Formen und Medien des Gedächtnisses der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, Heinz von. Das Gedächtnis. Eine quantenphysikalische Untersuchung. Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Gessner, Conrad. Pandectarum sive Partitionum universalium … libri XXI. Zurich: Apud Christophorum Froschoverum, 1548.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Stephen J., and Elisabeth S. Vrba. “Exaptation. A Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology 8, no. 1 (1982): 4–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300004310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Thomas. The Ark of Studies. Edited by Alberto Cevolini. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Heß, Gilbert. “Enzyklopädien und Florilegien im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Doctrina, Eruditio und Sapientia in verschiedenen Thesaurierungsformen.” In Wissenssicherung, Wissensordnung und Wissensverarbeitung. Das europäische Modell der Enzyklopädien, edited by Theo Stammen, and Wolfgang Weber, 24–57. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jungius, Joachim. Historia Vermium. Hamburg: Typis Brendekianis, 1691.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, Fabian. “Ulisse Aldrovandi’s Pandechion Epistemonicon and the Use of Paper Technology in Renaissance Natural History.” Early Science and Medicine 19, no. 6 (2014): 398–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-00195p02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krämer, Fabian, and Helmut Zedelmaier. “Instruments of Invention in Renaissance Europe: The Cases of Conrad Gesner and Ulisse Aldrovandi.” Intellectual History Review 24, no. 3 (2014): 321–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2014.891179
   Google Scholar
• Lancellotti, Secondo. L’Hoggidì, overo gl’ingegni non inferiori a’ passati. Venice: Appresso li Guerigli, 1662.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, Joan Marie. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces. New York: Pageant Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Leopardi, Giacomo. Scritti filologici (1817-1832). Edited by Giuseppe Pacella and Sebastiano Timpanaro. Florence: Le Monnier, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. “Die Behandlung von Irritationen: Abweichung oder Neuheit?” Vol. 4 of Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, edited by Niklas Luhmann, 55–100. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. “Interdisziplinäre Theoriebildung in den Sozialwissenschaften.” In Universität als Milieu. Kleine Schriften, edited by A. Kieserling, 62–68. Bielefeld: Haux, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. “Kommunikation mit Zettelkästen: Ein Erfahrungsbericht.” In Universität als Milieu. Kleine Schriften, edited by A. Kieserling, 53–61. Bielefeld: Haux, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. “Thomas Harrison and his Ark of Studies: An Episode in the History of the Organization of Knowledge.” The Seventeenth Century 19, no. 2 (2004): 196–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2004.10555543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, Thomas. “The Unanticipated Event and Astonishment.” Inquiry 3 (1960): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201746008601301
   Google Scholar
• McKitterick, David. Print, Manuscript, and the Search for Order 1450-1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of the Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, Christoph. “Enzyklopädie der Welt und Verzettelung des Wissens: Aporien der Empirie bei Joachim Jungius.” In Enzyklopädien der frühen Neuzeit. Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung, edited by Franz Eybl, 162–187. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Meiners, Christoph. Anweisungen für Jünglinge zum eigenen Arbeiten besonders zum Lesen, Excerpiren, und Schreiben. Hannover: In der Helwigischen Hofbuchhandlung, 1791.
   Google Scholar
• Morhof, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor, literarius, philosophicus et practicus. Lübeck: Sumptibus Petri Boeckmanni, 1747.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Muratori, Lodovico Antonio. Delle riflessioni sopra il buon gusto nelle scienze e nelle arti di Lamindo Pritanio (Orig. ed. 1708) Vol. 8 of Opere. Arezzo: Per Michele Bellotti, 1768.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, Paul. “Libros de papel, libri bianchi, libri papyracei. Note-Taking Techniques and the Role of Student Notebooks in the Early Jesuit Colleges.” Archivum Historicum Societatis Jesu 76 (2007): 75–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Walter. Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialog. From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. New York: Octagon Books, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Walter. The Presence of the Word. Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Partenio, Bernardino. Della imitatione poetica. Venice: Appresso Gabriel Giolito De’ Ferrari, 1560.
   Google Scholar
• Petrarca, Francesco. De remediis utriusque fortunae. Münich: Wilhelm Fink, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Placcius, Vincent. De arte excerpendi vom gelehrten Buchhalten liber singularis. Stockholm and Hamburg: Apud Gottfried Liebezeit, 1689.
   Google Scholar
• Pliny the Younger. Epistularum libri novem. Leipzig: Teubner, 1908.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzetti, Pompilio. Elogio d’Ireneo Affò. Parma: Nella Stamperia Gozzi, 1802.
   Google Scholar
• Quintilianus. Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim. Leipzig: Teubner, 1882.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchini, Francesco. De ratione libros cum profectu legendi libellus. Rome: Apud Bartholomaeum Zannettum, 1613.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, Claude, and Warren Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, Fritz C. “Notizenmachen: Funktionen, Formen und Werkzeugcharakter von Notizen.” In Handbuch Lernstrategien, edited by Heinz Mandl, and Helmut Felix Friedrich, 59–71. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tritheim, Johannes. De laude scriptorum. Mainz: Peter von Friedberg, 1494. Italian translation Elogio degli amanuensi. edited by Andrea Bernardelli. Palermo: Sellerio, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tugnoli Pattaro, Sandra. Metodo e sistema delle scienze nel pensiero di Ulisse Aldrovandi. Bologna: CLUEB, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Verdenelli, Marcello. “Cronistoria dell’idea leopardiana di Zibaldone.” Il Veltro 31 (1987): 591–624.
   Google Scholar
• Wellisch, Hans H. “How to Make an Index – Sixteenth Century Style: Conrad Gessner on Indexes and Catalogs.” International Classification 8 (1981): 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, Francis. The Art of Memory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard. “John Locke’s New Method of Commonplacing: Managing Memory and Information.” Eighteenth-Century Thought 2 (2004): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard. “Loose Notes and Capacious Memory: Robert Boyle’s Note-Taking and its Rationale.” Intellectual History Review 20, no. 3 (2010): 335–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2010.492613
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard. “Notebooks as Memory Aids: Precepts and Practices in Early Modern England.” Memory Studies 1, no. 1 (2008): 115–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698007083894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard. Notebooks, English Virtuosi, and Early Modern Science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard, and Ann Blair. Note-Taking in Early Modern Europe. Special Issue of Intellectual History Review 20, no. 3 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Zedelmaier, Helmut. “Buch, Exzerpt, Zettelschrank, Zettelkasten.” In Archivprozesse. Die Kommunikation der Aufbewahrung, edited by Hedwig Pompe, and Leander Scholz, 38–53. Cologne: Dumont, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zedelmaier, Helmut. “De ratione excerpendi: Daniel Georg Morhof und das Exzerpieren.” In Mapping the World of Learning: The Polyhistor of Daniel Georg Morhof, edited by Françoise Waquet, 75–92. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2000.
   Google Scholar