CPTu-SPT correlation analyses based on pairwise data in Southwestern Taiwan

References

• Akca, N. 2003. “Correlation of SPT-CPT Data from the United Arab Emirates.” Engineering Geology 67 (3-4): 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, M., M. Aaqib, S. Sadiq, S. J. Mandokhail, M. B. Adeel, and N. A. Kakar. 2018. “Empirical SPT-CPT Correlation for Soils from Lahore, Pakistan.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (1): 012015.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2011. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). D2487-11. PA, USA: West Conshohocken.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. D., R. B. Sancio, T. Durgunoglu, A. Onalp, T. L. Youd, J. P. Stewart, R. B. Seed, et al. 2004. “Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 130 (7): 673–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., and A. S. Hadi. 2015. Regression Analysis by Example. New York, USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. T., S. W. Duann, and T. C. Kao. 1988. “SPT-CPT Correlations for Granular Soils.” In Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Orlando, USA, 1, 335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, F. A. B., M. S. S. Almeida, E. N. Paiva, L. G. F. S. Mello, and B. R. Danziger. 1998. “The Piezocone as a Tool for Soil Stratification and Classification.” In Proceedings of 11th Congress on Mechanics of Soils and Geotechnical Engineering. Brazil, 2, 917–926.
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, B. R., and D. A. Velloso. 1995. “Correlations Between the CPT and the SPT for Some Brazilian Soils.” In Proceedings of Cone Penetration Testing, Linköping, Sweden, 2, 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, W., G. Cai, S. Liu, Y. Du, L. Zhu, and A. J. Puppala. 2018. “SPT-CPTU Correlations and Liquefaction Evaluation for the Island and Tunnel Project of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge.” International Journal of Civil Engineering 16 (10): 1423–1434.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, W., C. H. Juang, and J. Wasowski. 2021. “Geohazards and Human Settlements: Lessons Learned from Multiple Relocation Events in Badong, China – Engineering Geologist's Perspective.” Engineering Geology 285: 106051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., J. R. Martin, C. H. Juang, S. E. Dickenson, and N. J. McCullough. 2019. “A Hybrid Framework for Developing Empirical Model for Seismic Deformations of Anchored Sheetpile Bulkheads.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 116: 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., Y. M. Tien, C. H. Juang, J. R. Martin, and J. Zhang. 2016. “Calibration of Empirical Models Considering Model Fidelity and Model Robustness — Focusing on Predictions of Liquefaction-Induced Settlements.” Engineering Geology 203: 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, F. E. 1969. “Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples.” Technometrics 11 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. B., Q. Y. Zhu, and C. K. Siew. 2006. “Extreme Learning Machine: Theory and Applications.” Neurocomputing 70 (1-3): 489–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamiolkowski, M., G. Baldi, R. Bellotti, V. Ghionna, and E. Pasqualini. 1985. “Penetration Resistance and Liquefaction of Sands.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 4, 1891–1896.
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidi Chenari, R., H. Kamyab Farahbakhsh, S. Heidarie Golafzani, and A. Eslami. 2018. “Non-stationary Realisation of CPT Data: Considering Lithological and Inherent Heterogeneity.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 12 (4): 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies, M., and K. Been. 2015. Soil Liquefaction: A Critical State Approach. New York, USA: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Johari, A., and A. R. Khodaparast. 2013. “Modelling of Probability Liquefaction Based on Standard Penetration Tests Using the Jointly Distributed Random Variables Method.” Engineering Geology 158: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang, C. H., S. Y. Fang, and E. H. Khor. 2006. “First-order Reliability Method for Probabilistic Liquefaction Triggering Analysis Using CPT.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132 (3): 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang, C. H., W. Gong, J. R. MartinII, and Q. Chen. 2018. “Model Selection in Geological and Geotechnical Engineering in the Face of Uncertainty - Does a Complex Model Always Outperform a Simple Model?” Engineering Geology 242: 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, O. 2010. “Correlation Between CPT and SPT in Adapazari, Turkey.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, California, USA, 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, C. S., C. H. Juang, and C. Y. Ou. 2010. “Reliability of CPT Ic as an index for mechanical behaviour classification of soils.” Géotechnique 60 (11): 861–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhawy, F. H., and P. W. Mayne. 1990. Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design, Report No. EPRI-EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lingwanda, M. I., S. Larsson, and D. L. Nyaoro. 2015. “Correlations of SPT, CPT and DPL Data for Sandy Soil in Tanzania.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 33 (5): 1221–1233.
   Google Scholar
• Mallows, C. L. 1973. “Some Comments on Cp.” Technometrics 42 (1): 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D., F. Leisch, and K. Hornik. 2003. “The Support Vector Machine Under Test.” Neurocomputing 55 (1-2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhof, G. G. 1965. “Shallow Foundations.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 91 (2): 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura, S. I., T. Shuku, and T. Shibata. 2016. “Reliability-based Design of Earth-Fill Dams to Mitigate Damage due to Severe Earthquakes.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 10 (1): 83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. S. 1997. “Cyclic Liquefaction Based on the Cone Penetrometer Test.” In Proceedings of The NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, 225–276.
   Google Scholar
• Phoon, K. K., J. Ching, and T. Shuku. 2021. “Challenges in Data-Driven Site Characterization.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, B. 2009. “The Correlation Coefficient: Its Values Range Between +1/−1, or do They?” Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 17 (2): 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K. 2012. “The James K. Mitchell Lecture: Interpretation of in-situ tests-some insights.” In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (ISC-4), Pernambuco, Brazil, 4, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., and K. L. Cabal. 2010. Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering (4^th Edition). California, USA: Gregg Drilling and Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., R. G. Campanella, D. Gillespie, and J. Greig. 1986. “Use of Piezometer Cone Data.” In Proceedings of Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, New York, USA, 1263–1280.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., R. G. Campanella, and A. Wightman. 1983. “SPT-CPT Correlations.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 109 (11): 1449–1459.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating Cyclic Liquefaction Potential Using the Cone Penetration Test.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35 (3): 442–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. D. 2006. “Subsurface Exploration Using the Standard Penetration Test and the Cone Penetrometer Test.” Environmental and Engineering Geoscience 12 (2): 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schölkopf, B., A. J. Smola, and F. Bach. 2002. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. London, England: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics 6 (2): 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahri, A. A., C. Juhlin, and A. Malemir. 2014. “A Reliable Correlation of SPT-CPT Data for Southwest of Sweden.” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 19 (1013): e1032.
   Google Scholar
• Skempton, A. W. 1986. “Standard Penetration Test Procedures and the Effects in Sands of Overburden Pressure, Relative Density, Particle Size, Ageing and Overconsolidation.” Géotechnique 36 (3): 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y., T. Sanematsu, and K. Tokimatsu. 1998. “Correlation between SPT and Seismic CPT.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterization, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 1375–1380.
   Google Scholar
• Tarawneh, B. 2017. “Predicting Standard Penetration Test N-Value from Cone Penetration Test Data Using Artificial Neural Networks.” Geoscience Frontiers 8 (1): 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velloso, D. D. A. 1959. “O Ensaio de Diepsondeering e a Determinacao da Capacidade de Carga do Solo.” Rodovia, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Vipin, K. S., and T. G. Sitharam. 2012. “A Performance-Based Framework for Assessing Liquefaction Potential Based on CPT Data.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 6 (3): 177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127 (4): 297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. 2016. “Variable Selection with Stepwise and Best Subset Approaches.” Annals of Translational Medicine 4 (7): 136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., W. Gong, T. Li, C. H. Juang, H. Tang, and H. Wang. 2021. “Probabilistic Characterization of Subsurface Stratigraphic Configuration with Modified Random Field Approach.” Engineering Geology 288: 106138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar