Enhancing soil liquefaction risk assessment with metaheuristics and hybrid learning techniques

References

• Baykasoğlu, Adil, Abdülkadir Çevik, Lale Özbakır, and Sinem Kulluk. 2009. “Generating Prediction Rules for Liquefaction Through Data Mining.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (10): 12491–12499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.033.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, Ross W., and Izzat M. Idriss. 2014. “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.” Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01 1.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, Ross W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Mingxiang, Ouaer Hocine, Ahmed Salih Mohammed, Xiaoling Chen, Menad Nait Amar, and Mahdi Hasanipanah. 2022. “Integrating the LSSVM and RBFNN Models with Three Optimization Algorithms to Predict the Soil Liquefaction Potential.” Engineering with Computers 38 (4): 3611–3623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01392-w.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Yie-Ruey, Jing-Wen Chen, Shun-Chieh Hsieh, and Yi-Teng Chang. 2013. “Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction Potential Based on the Nonlinear Energy Dissipation Principles.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17 (1): 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.691256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Zhixiong, Yuhui Chen, Yanmei Zhang, Xingguo Liu, Peng Xiao, and Pijush Samui. 2023. “Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spread Using Soft Computing Approaches.” Gondwana Research 123: 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Tianqi, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Jui-Sheng, Chi-Yun Liu, Handy Prayogo, Riqi Radian Khasani, Danny Gho, and Gretel Gaby Lalitan. 2022. “Predicting Nominal Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Wall in Building by Metaheuristics-Optimized Machine Learning.” Journal of Building Engineering 61:105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105046.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Jui-Sheng, and Julian Pratama Putra Thedja. 2016. “Metaheuristic Optimization Within Machine Learning-Based Classification System for Early Warnings Related to Geotechnical Problems.” Automation in Construction 68:65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.015.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Jui-Sheng, and Dinh-Nhat Truong. 2021. “A Novel Metaheuristic Optimizer Inspired by Behavior of Jellyfish in Ocean.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 389:125535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Selçuk, and Emrehan Kutluğ Şahin. 2022. “Liquefaction Prediction with Robust Machine Learning Algorithms (SVM, RF, and XGBoost) Supported by Genetic Algorithm-Based Feature Selection and Parameter Optimization from the Perspective of Data Processing.” Environmental Earth Sciences 81 (18): 459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10578-4.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, Selçuk, and Emrehan Kutlug Sahin. 2023. “An Investigation of Feature Selection Methods for Soil Liquefaction Prediction Based on Tree-Based Ensemble Algorithms Using AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost.” Neural Computing and Applications 35 (4): 3173–3190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07856-4.
   Google Scholar
• Depina, Ivan, Saket Jain, Sigurdur Mar Valsson, and Hrvoje Gotovac. 2022. “Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Inverse Problems in Unsaturated Groundwater Flow.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 16 (1): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2021.1971251.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Yu, Idriss Jairi, and Nima Pirhadi. 2023. “Neural Transfer Learning for Soil Liquefaction Tests.” Computers & Geosciences 171:105282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri, C., J. Hernández-Orallo, and R. Modroiu. 2009. “An Experimental Comparison of Performance Measures for Classification.” Pattern Recognition Letters 30 (1): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2008.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, Anthony T. C. 1994. “Seismic Liquefaction Potential Assessed by Neural Networks.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 120 (9): 1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:9(1467).
   Google Scholar
• Goh, Anthony T. C. 1996. “Neural-Network Modeling of CPT Seismic Liquefaction Data.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122 (1): 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:1(70).
   Google Scholar
• Goh, Anthony T. C., and S. H. Goh. 2007. “Support Vector Machines: Their use in Geotechnical Engineering as Illustrated Using Seismic Liquefaction Data.” Computers and Geotechnics 34 (5): 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, Adel M., Derin Ural, and Gokhan Saygili. 2007. “Neural Network Model for Liquefaction Potential in Soil Deposits Using Turkey and Taiwan Earthquake Data.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (6): 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, Nhat-Duc, and Dieu Tien Bui. 2018. “Predicting Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction Based on a Hybridization of Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis and a Least Squares Support Vector Machine: A Multi-Dataset Study.” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 77 (1): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0924-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Jilei, and Huabei Liu. 2019. “Bayesian Network Models for Probabilistic Evaluation of Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Based on CPT and Vs Databases.” Engineering Geology 254:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Ji-Lei, Xiao-Wei Tang, and Jiang-Nan Qiu. 2015. “A Bayesian Network Approach for Predicting Seismic Liquefaction Based on Interpretive Structural Modeling.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 9 (3): 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2015.1076570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Jilei, Jing Wang, Zheng Zhang, and Huabei Liu. 2022. “Continuous-Discrete Hybrid Bayesian Network Models for Predicting Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Based on the Vs Database.” Computers & Geosciences 169:105231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105231.
   Google Scholar
• Janiesch, Christian, Patrick Zschech, and Kai Heinrich. 2021. “Machine Learning and Deep Learning.” Electronic Markets 31 (3): 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jas, Kaushik, and G. R. Dodagoudar. 2023. “Explainable Machine Learning Model for Liquefaction Potential Assessment of Soils Using XGBoost-SHAP.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 165:107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107662.
   Google Scholar
• Jas, Kaushik, and G. R. Dodagoudar. 2023. “Liquefaction Potential Assessment of Soils Using Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review from 1994–2021.” International Journal of Geomechanics 23 (7): 03123002. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7788.
   Google Scholar
• Juang, C. Hsein, Haiming Yuan, Der-Her Lee, and Ping-Sien Lin. 2003. “Simplified Cone Penetration Test-Based Method for Evaluating Liquefaction Resistance of Soils.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129 (1): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:1(66).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Yong Soo. 2010. “Performance Evaluation for Classification Methods: A Comparative Simulation Study.” Expert Systems with Applications 37 (3): 2292–2306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohestani, V. R., M. Hassanlourad, and A. Ardakani. 2015. “Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Based on CPT Data Using Random Forest.” Natural Hazards 79 (2): 1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1893-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kurnaz, Talas Fikret, Caner Erden, Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, Uğur Dağdeviren, and Alparslan Serhat Demir. 2023. “A Hyper Parameterized Artificial Neural Network Approach for Prediction of the Factor of Safety Against Liquefaction.” Engineering Geology 319:107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107109.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Yu-Chen, Li-Wei Liu, Sara Khoshnevisan, Chih-Sheng Ku, C. Hsein Juang, and Shi-Hao Xiao. 2023. “A new Approach to Constructing SPT-CPT Correlation for Sandy Soils.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 17 (2): 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2022.2083177.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenroth, J., K. Kalenchuk, L. Moreau-Verlaan, M. A. Perras, and U. T. Khan. 2023. “A Novel Long-Short Term Memory Network Approach for Stress Model Updating for Excavations in High Stress Environments.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 17 (1): 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2023.2182889.
   Google Scholar
• Ozsagir, Mustafa, Caner Erden, Ertan Bol, Sedat Sert, and Aşkın Özocak. 2022. “Machine Learning Approaches for Prediction of Fine-Grained Soils Liquefaction.” Computers and Geotechnics 152:105014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palese, Michael, Te Pei, Tong Qiu, Allan M. Zarembski, Chaopeng Shen, and Joseph W. Palese. 2023. “Hazard Assessment Framework for Statistical Analysis of cut Slopes Using Track Inspection Videos and Geospatial Information.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2023.2222369.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, L., J. J. Wang, L. L. Zhao, C. Y. Wang, and H. Zhan. 2019. “A Novel Protein Subcellular Localization Method With CNN-XGBoost Model for Alzheimer's Disease.” Frontiers in Genetics 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00751.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirhadi, Nima, Jilei Hu, Yu Fang, Idriss Jairi, Xusheng Wan, and Jianguo Lu. 2021. “Seismic Gravelly Soil Liquefaction Assessment Based on Dynamic Penetration Test Using Expanded Case History Dataset.” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80 (10): 8159–8170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02423-y.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Nerusupalli Dinesh Kumar, Ashok Kumar Gupta, and Anil Kumar Sahu. 2022. “A Novel Soil Liquefaction Prediction Model with Intellectual Feature Extraction and Classification.” Advances in Engineering Software 173:103233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103233.
   Google Scholar
• Rezania, Mohammad, Akbar A. Javadi, and Orazio Giustolisi. 2010. “Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Based on CPT Results Using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression.” Computers and Geotechnics 37 (1): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug, and Selcuk Demir. 2023. “Greedy-AutoML: A Novel Greedy-Based Stacking Ensemble Learning Framework for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 119:105732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105732.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Mengfen, C. Hsein Juang, Chih-Sheng Ku, and Sara Khoshnevisan. 2019. “Assessing Effect of Dynamic Compaction on Liquefaction Potential Using Statistical Methods – A Case Study.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 13 (4): 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1623407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova, Marina, and Guy Lapalme. 2009. “A Systematic Analysis of Performance Measures for Classification Tasks.” Information Processing & Management 45 (4): 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 15:1929–1958. https://doi.org/10.5555/2627435.2670313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongsuwan, Setthanun, Saichon Jaiyen, Anantachai Padcharoen, and Praveen Agarwal. 2021. “ConvXGB: A New Deep Learning Model for Classification Problems Based on CNN and XGBoost.” Nuclear Engineering and Technology 53 (2): 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldegebriel, H. T., H. Liu, A. U. Haq, E. Bugingo, and D. Zhang. 2020. “A New Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network and EXtreme Gradient Boosting Classifier for Recognizing Handwritten Ethiopian Characters.” IEEE Access 8:17804–17818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960161.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Xinhua, and Ming Xiao. 2016. “Application of Genetic Algorithm-Based Support Vector Machines for Prediction of Soil Liquefaction.” Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (10): 874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5673-7.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Xinhua, and Xingguo Yang. 2016. “Seismic Liquefaction Potential Assessed by Support Vector Machines Approaches.” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 75 (1): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0741-x.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., F. Ghahari, P. Arduino, and E. Taciroglu. 2023. “A Deep Learning Approach for Rapid Detection of Soil Liquefaction Using Time–Frequency Images.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 166:107788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107788.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. G., and A. T. C. Goh. 2013. “Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines for Analysis of Geotechnical Engineering Systems.” Computers and Geotechnics 48:82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Wengang, Anthony T. C. Goh, Yanmei Zhang, Yumin Chen, and Yang Xiao. 2015. “Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Based on Capacity Energy Concept and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines.” Engineering Geology 188:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yonggang, Yuanlun Xie, Yan Zhang, Junbo Qiu, and Sunxin Wu. 2021. “The Adoption of Deep Neural Network (DNN) to the Prediction of Soil Liquefaction Based on Shear Wave Velocity.” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80 (6): 5053–5060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02250-1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Zening, Wei Duan, Guojun Cai, Meng Wu, and Songyu Liu. 2022. “CPT-Based Fully Probabilistic Seismic Liquefaction Potential Assessment to Reduce Uncertainty: Integrating XGBoost Algorithm with Bayesian Theorem.” Computers and Geotechnics 149:104868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Jian, Shuai Huang, Tao Zhou, Danial Jahed Armaghani, and Yingui Qiu. 2022. “Employing a Genetic Algorithm and Grey Wolf Optimizer for Optimizing RF Models to Evaluate Soil Liquefaction Potential.” Artificial Intelligence Review 55 (7): 5673–5705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10140-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar