Recasts, metalinguistic feedback, and learners' perceptions: a case of Persian EFL learners

References

• Ammar, A. 2008. Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 12, no. 2: 183–210. 10.1177/1362168807086287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidi, S.M. 2002. Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning 52, no. 1: 1–42. 10.1111/1467-9922.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.B. 2007. 6th ed. Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, H., K. Jeon, D. MacGregor, and A. Mackey. 2006. Recasts and repetitions: Learners' interpretations of native speaker responses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 209–36. 10.1017/S0272263106060104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, S., and M. Swain. 1993. Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, no. 3: 357–86. 10.1017/S0272263100012158
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, no. 4: 431–69. 10.1017/S0272263100010287
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. 2001. Cognitive underpinning of focus on form. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 206–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C., and E. Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 114–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty C., and J. Williams, eds. 1998. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egi, T. 2007. Recasts, learners' perceptions, and L2 development. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 249–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egi, T. 2010. Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal 94, no. 1: 1–21. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2007. The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 339–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., S. Loewen, and R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 339–68. 10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S.M., and K. Lewis. 2007. Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 79–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z.H. 2002. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly 36, no. 3: 543–72. 10.2307/3588240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskins, B. 2000. Let's go 1: Kate's grandma, rusty's cookies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N. 2003. Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, no. 1: 1–36. 10.1017/S0272263103000019
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.H., and Z.H. Han. 2007. Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 269–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60, no. 2: 309–65. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., and T. Nabei. 2007. Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 361–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, ed. K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg and C. Kramsch, 39–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia, 413–68. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., and P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 1998a. Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 48, no. 2: 183–218. 10.1111/1467-9922.00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 1998b. Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, no. 1: 51–81. 10.1017/S027226319800103X
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, no. 3: 399–432. 10.1017/S0272263104263021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., and J. Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59,, 453–98. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., and H. Mori. 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 269–300. 10.1017/S0272263106060128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., and L. Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, no. 1: 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. 2006. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27, no. 3: 405–30. 10.1093/applin/ami051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. 2007. Interaction as practice. In Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology, ed. R. DeKeyser, 85–110. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., Al-Khalil, M., G. Atanassova, M. Ham, Logan-Terry, A., and K. Nakatsukasa. 2007. Teachers' intentions and learners' perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1, no. 1: 129–52. 10.2167/illt047.0
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., S. Gass, and K. McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22, no. 4: 471–97. 10.1017/S0272263100004022
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., and J. Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 407–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., and J. Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal 82, no. 3: 338–56. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. 2005. Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, no. 1: 79–103. 10.1017/S0272263105050047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2009. Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning 59, no. 2: 411–52. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. 1995. Negative feedback in child NS–NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, no. 4: 459–83. 10.1017/S0272263100014418
   Google Scholar
• Panova, I., and R. Lyster. 2002. Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 36, no. 3: 573–95. 10.2307/3588241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, J. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, no. 1: 99–126. 10.1017/S0272263103000044
   Google Scholar
• Rassaei, E., A. Moinzadeh, and M. Youhannaee. 2012. The effect of corrective feedback on the acquisition of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning 2, no. 1: 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., and N. Spada. 2006. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, ed. J. Norris and L. Ortega, 131–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2: 206–26. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson,, 3–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8, no. 2: 263–300. 10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2007. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 301–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N. 1997. Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language teaching 29, no. 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N., and P.M. Lightbown. 1999. Instruction, first language influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83, no. 1: 1–22. 10.1111/0026-7902.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in second language acquisition, ed. S. Gass and C. Madden, 235–52. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1995. Three function of output in second language learning. In Principles and practice in applied linguistics, ed. G. Cook and B. Seidhofer, 125–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J. Lantolf, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trofimovich, P., A. Ammar, and E. Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 171–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. 2004. Input processing in SLA. In Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 5–31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar