Perceptual mismatches in the interpretation of task-based ELT materials: a micro-evaluation of a task-based English lesson

References

• Allwright, R. L. 1984. “Why Don’t Learners Learn What Teachers Teach? – The Interaction Hypothesis.” In Language Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts, edited by D. M. Singleton and D. G. Little, 3–18. Dublin: IRAAL.
   Google Scholar
• Andon, N., and J. Eckerth. 2009. “Chacun a Son Gout?” Task Based L2 Pedagogy From the Teacher’s Point of View. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (3): 286–310.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. M. 1996. “The Best-laid Plans: Teachers” In-class Decisions to Depart From Their Lesson Plans.” In Voices From the Language Classroom, edited by K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan, 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D. 1996. “A Window on the Classroom: Classroom Events Viewed From Different Angles.” In Voices From the Language Classroom, edited by K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan, 168–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. 2011. “The Implementation of Communicative and Task-based Language Teaching in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 36–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. R. 2003. “Factors in the Implementation of Task-based Teaching in Primary Schools.” System 31: 485–500.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. R. 2004. “Issues in Teachers” Reinterpretation of a Task-based Innovation in Primary Schools.” TESOL Quarterly 38 (4): 639–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X. 2000. “Asian Students” Reticence Revisited.” System 28: 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Ministry of Education. 2007. College English Curriculum Requirements. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crabbe, D. 2003. “The Quality of Language Learning Opportunities.” TESOL Quarterly 37 (1): 9–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabbe, D. 2007. “Learning Opportunities: Adding Learning Value to Tasks.” ELT Journal 61 (2): 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 1997. “Psychological Processes in Cooperative Language Learning: Group Dynamics and Motivation.” The Modern Language Journal 81: 482–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and K. Csizér. 2012. “How to Design and Analyze Surveys in Second Language Acquisition Research.” In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide, edited by A. Mackey and S. M. Gass, 74–94. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and M. Kubanyiova. 2013. Motivating Learners, Motivating Teachers: Building Vision in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, T. 2006. “What Purposes, Specifically? Re-Thinking Purposes and Specificity in the Context of the “new Vocationalism.’.” English for Specific Purposes 25: 387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2005. “Principles of Instructed Language Learning.” System 33: 209–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. “Task-based Language Teaching: Sorting out the Misunderstandings.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3): 221–246.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2010. “Second Language Acquisition Research and Language-Teaching Materials.” In English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, edited by N. Harwood, 36–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2011. “Macro- and Micro-evaluations of Task-based Teaching.” In Materials Development in Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 212–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. 2009. “Task-based Language Learning Research: Expecting too Much or too Little?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3): 247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. 1996. “Redefining the Relationship Between Research and What Teachers Know.” In Voices From the Language Classroom, edited by K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan, 88–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. A. 2012. “How to Collect and Analyze Qualitative Data.” In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide, edited by A. Mackey and S. M. Gass, 180–200. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García Mayo, M. P. 2002. “The Effectiveness of two Form-Focused Tasks in Advanced EFL Pedagogy.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (2): 156–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gatbonton, E., and G. Gu. 1994. “Preparing and Implementing a Task-based Curriculum in an EFL Setting: Implications for Theory and Practice.” TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada 11 (2): 09–29.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, X., and G. Ferguson. 2013. “Strategic Planning in Task-based Language Teaching: The Effects of Participatory Structure and Task Type.” System 41: 982–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrettaz, A. M., and B. Johnston. 2013. “Materials in the Classroom Ecology.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (3): 779–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, M. R., and E. Babaii. 2013. “Mixed Methods Research: Toward New Designs in Applied Linguistics.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (4): 828–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, C. J. 2007. “Floor Management in Task-based Interaction: The Interactional Role of Participatory Structures.” System 35: 609–622.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, I.-J., and J.-W. Hahn. 2006. “Exploring EFL Teachers” Perceptions of Task-based Language Teaching: A Case Study of Korean Secondary School Classroom Practice.” Asian EFL Journal 8 (1): 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Karabuga, F. 2015. “Match or Mismatch Between Learning Styles of Prep-class EFL Students and EFL Teachers.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 12 (2): 276–288.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Y. Jung, and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2017. “Implementation of a Localized Task-based Course in an EFL Context: A Study of Students” Evolving Perceptions.” TESOL Quarterly 51 (3): 632–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., and D. A. Kolb. 2005. “Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education.” Academy of Management 4 (2): 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 1991. “Language-learning Tasks: Teacher Intention and Learner Interpretation.” ELT Journal 45 (2): 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 1994. “The Postmethod Condition: (E)Merging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 28 (1): 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 2001. “Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy.” TESOL Quarterly 35 (4): 537–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 2006. “TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends.” TESOL Quarterly 40 (1): 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. 2015. “EFL Learners” Perspectives on ELT Materials Evaluation Relative to Learning Styles.” RELC Journal 46 (2): 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-B., and C.-W. Wu. 2012. “Teachers” Perceptions of Task-Based Language Teaching in English Classrooms in Taiwanese Junior High Schools.” TESOL Journal 3 (4): 586–609.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A. 2011. “The Analysis of Language Teaching Materials: Inside the Trojan Horse.” In Materials Development in Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 179–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. 1985. “A Role for Instruction: Task-based Language Teaching.” In Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, edited by M. Pienemann and K. Hyltenstam, 77–99. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, A. 2011. “Squaring the Circle – Reconciling Materials as Constraint with Materials as Empowerment.” In Materials Development in Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 379–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K., and W. Chaikitmongkol. 2007. “Teachers” and Learners” Reactions to a Task-based EFL Course in Thailand.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (1): 107–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, I. 2002. Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, P. 2007. “The Four Strands.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 2–13. DOI:10.2167/illt039.0.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P., and J. Macalister. 2010. Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1988. The Learner-Centred Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1991. “Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum.” TESOL Quarterly 25 (2): 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1995. “Closing the gap Between Learning and Instruction.” TESOL Quarterly 29 (1): 133–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1996. “Hidden Voices: Insiders” Perspectives on Classroom Interaction.” In Voices From the Language Classroom, edited by K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan, 41–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 2004. Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, M. 2001. “Match or Mismatch? Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in EFL.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu, N. S. 1987. Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyun, D. O. 2013. “Attitudes Toward Task-based Language Learning: A Study of College Korean Language Learners.” Foreign Language Annals 46 (1): 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. 2013. “Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design.” RELC Journal 44 (1): 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 2011. “Task-based Language Learning: A Review of Issues.” Language Learning 61 (1): 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005. ““Task” as Research Construct.” Language Learning 55 (3): 533–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1996. “A Framework for the Implementation of Task-Based Instruction.” Applied Linguistics 17: 38–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 2002. “A Non-marginal Role for Tasks.” ELT Journal 56 (3): 289–295.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2011. “Introduction: Principles and Procedures of Materials Development.” In Materials Development in Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2012. “Materials Development for Language Learning and Teaching.” Language Teaching 45 (2): 143–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2013a. “Developing Principled Frameworks for Materials Development.” In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 96–118. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2013b. “Materials Evaluation.” In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 21–48. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Branden, K. 2009. “Mediating Between Predetermined Order and Chaos: The Role of the Teacher in Task-based Language Education.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3): 264–285.
   Google Scholar
• Watson Todd, R. 2006. “Continuing Change After the Innovation.” System 34: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H. P. 2012. “The Use of Complaint Letters as an Authentic Source of Input for an Interactive Task in Second Language Learning.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 9 (2): 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H. P. 2015a. “Designing and Implementing Task-Based Vocational English Materials: Text, Language, Task, and Context in Indonesia.” In Contemporary Task-Based Language Teaching in Asia, edited by M. Thomas and H. Reinders, 291–312. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H. P. 2015b. “The Development of Vocational English Materials from a Social Semiotic Perspective: Participatory Action Research.” Unpublished Ph.D thesis, the University of Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H. P. 2017. “Constructing and Negotiating Agency and Identity of English Language Learners: Teacher-learner Driven ESP Materials Development in the Indonesian Secondary School Context.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 14: 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H. P., and Savova, L. Eds. 2010. The Lincom Guide to Materials Design in ELT. Muenchen, Germany: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. M. H. 2011. “‘Try to Describe the Main Point of Your Lesson.’: Student Perception and Identification of Learning Objectives in English Lessons.” Reflections on English Language Teaching 8 (2): 73–88.
   Google Scholar