The role of redressing teachers’ instructional feedback interventions in EFL learners’ motivation and achievement in distance education

References

• Amiryousefi, M. 2016. “Influence of Teacher Feedback Discourses on EFL Learners Academic Self-Concept, Attributions, L2 Speaking, Class Performance, and L2 Achievement: Confirmatory Feedback in Focus.” Teaching English Language 10 (1): 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Amiryousefi, M., R. Sasaninejhad, and Z. Amirian. 2018. “How Iranian EFL Learners, Native Persian Speakers, and English Native Speakers Attempt to Manage Rapport in Service Encounters.” Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning 10 (21): 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. 2016. “The Importance of Instructor Clarity and Its Effect on Student Learning: Facilitating Elaboration by Reducing Cognitive Load.” Communication Reports 29 (3): 152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., A. K. Goodboy, and D. M. Kelsey. 2016. “Instructor Clarity and Student Motivation: Academic Performance as a Product of Students’ Ability and Motivation to Process Instructional Material.” Communication Education 65 (2): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummernhenrich, B., and R. Jucks. 2013. “Managing Face Threats and Instructions in Online Tutoring.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (2): 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. 1990. “The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning.” Communication Education 39 (4): 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Gordon, C. V., N. D. Bowman, E. R. Watts, J. Banks, and J. M. Knight. 2018. “As Good as Your Word: Face-Threat Mitigation and the Use of Instructor Nonverbal Cues on Students’ Perceptions of Digital Feedback.” Communication Education 67 (2): 206–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, J. A., and A. L. Vangelisti. 2003. “Skillfully Instructing Learners: How Communicators Effectively Convey Messages.” In Handbook of Communication and Social Interactions Skills, edited by J. O. Greene, and B. R. Burleson, 871–908. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Dornisch, M., R. A. Sperling, and J. A. Zeruth. 2011. “The Effects of Levels of Elaboration on Learners’ Strategic Processing of Text.” Instructional Science 39 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2009. “The L2 Motivational Self System.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei, and E. Ushioda, 9–42. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Toro, M., and S. Hurd. 2014. “A Model of Factors Affecting Independent Learners’ Engagement with Feedback on Language Learning Tasks.” Distance Education 35 (1): 106–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., A. R. Slone, and E. Bengu. 2017. “Rapport, Motivation, Participation, and Perceptions of Learning in U.S. and Turkish Student Classrooms: A Replication and Cultural Comparison.” Communication Education 66 (2): 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hadden, A. A., and B. N. Frisby. 2019. “Face Threat Mitigation in Feedback: An Examination of Student Feedback Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Emotional Support.” Communication Quarterly 67 (1): 60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., M. J. Smythe, and Communication 451, 2001. “Is Teacher Immediacy Actually Related to Student Cognitive Learning?” Communication Studies 52 (3): 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, S. 2001. “Managing and Supporting Language Learners in Open and Distance Learning Environments.” In Beyond Language Teaching towards Language Advising, edited by M. Mozzon-McPherson, and R. Vismans, 135–148. London: CILT and University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., J. A. Hess, and A. R. Trees. 2003. “Sustaining the Desire to Learn: Dimensions of Perceived Instructional Facework Related to Student Involvement and Motivation to Learn.” Western Journal of Communication 67 (4): 357–381.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., A. R. Trees, and J. A. Hess. 2008. “Attentive Facework during Instructional Feedback: Key to Perceiving Mentorship and an Optimal Learning Environment.” Communication Education 57 (3): 312–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., and P. L. Witt. 2012. “Instructional Feedback II: How Do Instructor Immediacy Cues and Facework Tactics Interact to Predict Student Motivation and Fairness Perceptions?” Communication Studies 63 (4): 498–517.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., and P. L. Witt. 2015. “Instructional Feedback III: How Do Instructor Facework Tactics and Immediacy Cues Interact to Predict Student Perceptions of Being Mentored?” Communication Education 64 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnison, L. Q. 2017. “Power, Integrity, and Mask – An Attempt to Disentangle the Chinese Face Concept.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormos, J., T. Kiddle, and K. Csizér. 2011. “Systems of Goals, Attitudes, and Self-Related Beliefs in Second-Language-Learning Motivation.” Applied Linguistics 32 (5): 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutlaki, S. A. 2002. “Offers and Expressions of Thanks as Face Enhancing Acts: Tæ'arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1733–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C. 2011. “Linguistic Politeness in Student-Team Emails: Its Impact on Trust between Leaders and Members.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 54 (4): 360–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T. S., and J. W. Bowers. 1991. “Facework, Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact.” Human Communication Research 17 (3): 415–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magid, M., and L. Chan. 2012. “Motivating English Learners by Helping Them Visualise Their Ideal L2 Self: Lessons from Two Motivational Programmes.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 6 (2): 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., and R. M. Ryan. 2009. “Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice.” School Field 7 (2): 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., T. Flowerday, and R. Brünken. 2015. “Cognitive and Affective Effects of Seductive Details in Multimedia Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 44: 267–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. 2012. “The Language-Learning Self, Self-Enhancement Activities, and Self Perceptual Change.” Language Teaching Research 16 (3): 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafran, R. W. 2019. “Level of Directness and the Use of Please in Requests in English by Native Speakers of Arabic and Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics 148: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, M. J., and J. A. Hess. 2005. “Are Student Self-Reports a Valid Method for Measuring Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy?” Communication Education 54 (2): 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, V., and J. B. Peterson. 2018. “Improving the Effectiveness of Performance Feedback by Considering Personality Traits and Task Demands.” PloS one 13 (5): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, T., M. Magid, and M. Papi. 2009. “The L2 Motivational Self-System among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Study.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei, and E. Ushioda, 66–97. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., and J. P. Mazer. 2010. “Clarity in Teaching and Learning: Conundrums, Consequences, and Opportunities.” In The SAGE Handbook of Communication and Instruction, edited by D. L. Fasset, and J. T. Warren, 241–261. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trad, L., J. Katt, and A. Neville Miller. 2014. “The Effect of Face Threat Mitigation on Instructor Credibility and Student Motivation in the Absence of Instructor Nonverbal Immediacy.” Communication Education 63 (2): 136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., J. Kerssen-Griep, and J. A. Hess. 2009. “Earning Influence by Communicating Respect: Facework's Contributions to Effective Instructional Feedback.” Communication Education 58 (3): 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueki, M., and O. Takeuchi. 2013. “Forming a Clearer Image of the Ideal L2 Self: The L2 Motivational Self System and Learner Autonomy in a Japanese EFL Context.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 7 (3): 238–252.
   Google Scholar
• Um, E., J. L. Plass, E. O. Hayward, and B. D. Homer. 2012. “Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (2): 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. 2011. “Language Learning Motivation, Self and Identity: Current Theoretical Perspectives.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 24 (3): 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., and J. Kerssen-Griep. 2011. “Instructional Feedback I: The Interaction of Facework and Immediacy on Students’ Perceptions of Instructor Credibility.” Communication Education 60 (1): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar