Examining L2 teachers’ critical incidents: a complexity theoretic perspective

References

• Angelides, P. 2001. “The Development of an Efficient Technique for Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data: The Analysis of Critical Incidents.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 14: 429–442. doi:10.1080/09518390110029058.
   Google Scholar
• Atai, M. R., and H. Nejadghanbar. 2016. “Unpacking In-service EFL Teachers’ Critical Incidents: The Case of Iran.” RELC Journal 47: 97–110. doi:10.1177/0033688216631177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2015. Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. Norfolk: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1990. The Skillful Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A., D. Freeman, and E. Edwards. 2015. “Theorizing and Studying the Language-Teaching Mind: Mapping Research on Language Teacher Cognition.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (3): 585–601. doi:10.1111/modl.12245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A., and J. S. Knox. 2011. “Classrooms as Complex Adaptive Systems: A Relational Model.” TESL–EJ 15: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, F. M. 2013. “Turning Experiences into Critical Reflections: Examples from Taiwanese In-service Teachers.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 41: 28–40. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.753987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, G. R., G. Auhl, and W. Hastings. 2013. “Collaborative Feedback and Reflection for Professional Growth: Preparing First-Year Pre-service Teachers for Participation in the Community of Practice.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 41: 159–172. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.777025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2008. “Critical Incidents in ELT Initial Teacher Training.” ELT Journal 62: 3–10. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm072.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2013a. “Critical Incident Analysis Through Narrative Reflective Practice: A Case Study.” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 1: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2013b. Reflective Practice in ESL Teacher Development Groups: From Practices to Principles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Feryok, A. 2010. “Language Teacher Cognitions: Complex Dynamic Systems?” System 38: 272–279. doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, O. 1991. The Science of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. 1995. “The Reflective Journal: A Window to Preservice Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Teaching and Teacher Education 11: 229–241. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00031-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. 1993. “Renaming Experience/Reconstructing Practice: Developing New Understanding of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 9: 485–497. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(93)90032 doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(93)90032-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Golombek, P. R. 1998. “A Study of Language Teachers’ Personal Practical Knowledge.” TESOL Quarterly 32: 447–464. doi:10.2307/3588117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L. 2003. “Using Critical Incidents to Promote and Assess Reflective Thinking in Preservice Teachers.” Reflective Practice 4: 207–220. doi:10.1080/14623940308274.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. M., and S. D. C. Townsend. 2017. “Using Critical Incidents and E-Portfolios to Understand the Emergent Practice of Japanese Student-Teachers of English.” Teaching and Teacher Education 62: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, T. 2012. “The Complexity of Teacher Learning: Reflection as a Complex Dynamic System.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education 2: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kubanyiova, M., and A. Feryok. 2015. “Language Teacher Cognition in Applied Linguistics Research: Revisiting the Territory, Redrawing the Boundaries, Reclaiming the Relevance.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (3): 435–449. doi:10.1111/modl.12239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. 2007. “On the Complementarity of Chaos/Complexity Theory and Dynamic Systems Theory in Understanding the Second Language Acquisition Process.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10: 35–37. doi:10.1017/S136672890600277X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, D., and A. Prescott. 2017. “Professional Development for Rural and Remote Teachers Using Video Conferencing.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2017.1296930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini, S. A., and S. Khodakarami. 2015. “A Glimpse of Contrasting de jure–de facto ELT Policies in Iran.” In English Language Teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, Trends and Challenges, edited by C. Kennedy, 23–34. London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Nott, M., and J. Wellington. 1995. “Critical Incidents in the Science Classroom and the Nature of Science.” School Science Review 76: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, J., M. A. Bray, E. Bilias-Lolis, and T. J. Kehle. 2017. “The Good Behavior Game for Latino English Language Learners in a Small-Group Setting.” International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 5: 26–38. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1169961.
   Google Scholar
• Poynter, R. 2010. The Handbook of Online and Social Media Research. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and T. S. C. Farrell. 2005. Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, M. E. 2006. “‘Bumpy Moments’ in Teaching: Reflections from Practicing Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22: 973–985. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, H. 2012. A Dictionary of Research Methodology and Statistics in Applied Linguistics. Tehran: Rahnama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theurer, K. L. 2014. “Complexity-Based Theories of Emergence: Criticisms and Constraints.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28: 277–301. doi:10.1080/02698595.2014.953342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, T. 1999. “Reflections on Critical Incidents.” Prospect 14 (1): 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. 1993. Critical Incidents in Teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S., and S. Mann. 2015. “Doing Reflective Practice: A Data-led Way Forward.” ELT Journal 69: 351–362. doi:10.1093/elt/ccv018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, C. E., N. van den Bogert, H. Jarodzka, and H. P. Boshuizen. 2014. “Keeping an Eye on Learning: Differences Between Expert and Novice Teachers’ Representations of Classroom Management Events.” Journal of Teacher Education 66: 68–85. doi:10.1177/0022487114549810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, P. 1993. “Critical Events in Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 14: 355–371. doi: 10.1080/0142569930140401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H. 2013. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: A Dynamic and Complex Relationship.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 41: 331–343. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.809051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar