Military English language education: a scoping review of 30 years of research

References

• References with an asterisk indicate that it was included in the scoping review.
   Google Scholar
• *Abd Rahman, E., M. Md Yunus, H. Hashim, and N. K. Ab Rahman. 2022. “Learner Autonomy Between Students and Teachers at a Defence University: Perception vs. Expectation.” Sustainability 14 (10): 6086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Alqahtani, A. F. 2017. “A Study of the Language Learning Motivation of Saudi Military Cadets.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 6 (4): 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• *Alqahtani, A. F. 2018. “English Language Learning Motivation and English Language Learning Anxiety in Saudi Military Cadets: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 9 (3): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• *Alqahtani, A. F. 2020. “The Relationship Between the Saudi Cadets’ Learning Motivation and Their Vocabulary Knowledge.” English Language Teaching 13 (4): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• *Alshabeb, A., F. H. Alsubaie, and A. Z. Albasheer. 2017. “English for Specific Purposes: A Study Investigating the Mismatch Between the ‘Cutting Edge’ Course Book and the Needs of Prince Sultan Air Base Students.” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 8 (3): 376–391.
   Google Scholar
• *Alshehab, M. 2014. “The Translatability of Military Terms by MA Students in Translation at Yarmouk University in Jordan.” International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies 2 (3): 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• *Berthele, R., and G. Wittlin. 2013. “Receptive Multilingualism in the Swiss Army.” International Journal of Multilingualism 10 (2): 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• BILC. 2024a. Policy Documents. Retrieved February 29, 2024 from https://www.natobilc.org/en/products/policy-documents-bilc-documents/.
   Google Scholar
• BILC. 2024b. STANAG 6001. Retrieved February 29, 2024 from https://www.natobilc.org/en/products/stanag-60011142_stanag-6001/.
   Google Scholar
• *Bogusz, D. 2017. “Teaching English Military Terminology in Military Classes.” Safety & Defense 3 (1): 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• *Chen, L., K. Chang, and S. Yang. 2021. “An Integrated Corpus-Based Text Mining Approach Used to Process Military Technical Information for Facilitating EFL Troopers’ Linguistic Comprehension: Us Anti-Tank Missile Systems as an Example.” Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 49: 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S., and L. Plonsky. 2023. “A Typology of Secondary Research in Applied Linguistics.” Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., and H. Reinders. 2022. “Autonomy of English Language Learners: A Scoping Review of Research and Practice.” Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221075812.
   Google Scholar
• Crossey, M. 2005. Improving Linguistic Interoperability. NATO Review. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2005/06/01/improving-linguistic-interoperability/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• *de Fourestier, J. 2010. “Official Languages in the Armed Forces of Multilingual Countries: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Language Policy 2 (1): 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Di Biase, M. J., and F. Gratton. 2015. “Interpreting the Speaking Performance Requirements of Forward air Controllers.” In Language in Uniform, edited by H. Joyce, and E. Thomson, 2–17. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DLIFLC. 2023. Languages offered. https://www.dliflc.edu/about/languages-at-dliflc/.
   Google Scholar
• *Farr, K. 2016. “A Study Into the Motivation of Swedish Military Staff Officers to Learn English.” Konin Language Studies 4 (4): 391–413.
   Google Scholar
• *Finardi, K. R., N. Silveira, C. de Alencar, and J. G. D. 2016. “First Aid and Waves in English as a Foreign Language: Insights from CLIL in Brazil.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 20 (3): 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• *Fuentes-Luque, A., and A. P. Campbell. 2020. “Using Subtitling to Improve Military ESP Listening Comprehension.” Ibérica 40: 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• *Gawliczek, P., V. Krykun, N. Tarasenko, M. Tyshchenko, and O. Shapran. 2021. “Computer Adaptive Language Testing According to NATO STANAG 6001 Requirements.” Advanced Education 17: 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• *Grafeeva, C. V. 2020. “Formation of a Stable Positive Motivation to Study with Senior Students of Higher Military Educational Institutions by Creating a High Loyalty Atmosphere” Apuntes Universitarios 10 (4): 204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Grande, B., C. D. Leishman, and H. K. Skilleås. 2022. ““I Can’t Come to the Words”: Effects of Including Military Flavour When Testing the Oral Proficiency of Norwegian Joint Terminal Attack Controllers.” English for Specific Purposes 68:73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R., and D. Wall. 2005. “Language Testing in the Military: Problems, Politics and Progress.” Language Testing 22 (3): 379–398.
   Google Scholar
• *Hung, Y.-J., and S.-M. Chao. 2021. “Practicing Tiered and Heterogeneous Grouping Tasks in Differentiated EFL Classrooms at a Military Institution in Taiwan.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 41 (3): 405–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T., and A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Jodaei, H., G. Zareian, M. R. Amirian, and S. M. R. Adel. 2018. “From the State of Motivated to Demotivated: Iranian Military EFL Learners’ Motivation Change.” The Journal of Asia TEFL 15 (1): 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., and L. Askew. 2014. Meeting the Language Challenges of NATO Operations: Policy, Practice and Professionalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Juhl Kristensen, A., and K. Kildevang. 2019. In Demand, Yet in Decline: English in the Professional Military Education in Denmark. BILC Annual Conference, Tartu, Estonia. https://www.natobilc.org/en/product/43-2019-tartu-estonia-from-the-classroom-to-the-boots-on-the-ground-the-stakeholders-perspective-/.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. D., M. A. Sabol, R. A. Wisher, and R. J. Seidel. 1998. “The Military Language Tutor (MILT) Program: An Advanced Authoring System.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 11 (3): 265–287.
   Google Scholar
• Keagle, J. M., and T. G. Petros. 2010. “Building Partner Capacity Through Education: NATO Engagement with the Partnership for Peace.” Connections 10 (1): 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• *Kurum, Y. E. 2011. “The Effect of Motivational Factors on the Foreign Language Success of Students at the Turkish Military Academy.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5 (2): 299–307.
   Google Scholar
• *Lahodynskyi, O., K. Mamchur, and V. Skab. 2018. “English Spycraft Professionalisms as a Linguistic Phenomenon.” Advanced Education (9): 178–184.
   Google Scholar
• Maiier, N., and V. Yukhymenko. 2022. “Mobile Technologies in the Development of Rofessionally Oriented English Speech Interaction Competence in Information Systems and Technology Military Students*.” ІCT and Learning Tools in the Higher Education Establishment 2 (88): 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, N., E. Roberts, and J. Popay. 2001. “Synthesising Research Evidence.” In Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods, edited by P. Allen, N. Black, A. Clarke, N. Fulop, and S. Anderson, 188–220. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J. R. 1970. “History of Foreign Language Teaching at the United States Military Academy.” The Modern Language Journal 54 (5): 319–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, R. 2012. “Language and Interoperability in NATO: The Bureau for International Language Co-Ordination (BILC).” Canadian Military Journal 13 (1): 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., M. D. J. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris. 2018. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing Between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 18 (143): 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nakashima, A., S. M. Abel, and I. Smith. 2018. “Communication in Military Environments: Influence of Noise, Hearing Protection and Language Proficiency.” Applied Acoustics 131: 38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO. 1994. Partnership for Peace: Framework Document. Retrieved March 1 from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_24469.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2023. NATO Education and Training for IO, PSYOPS, PA and StratCom. https://www.act.nato.int/our-work/communication-discipline-training/.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Term. 2024. NATO Terminology Database. https://nso.nato.int/natoterm/Web.mvc.
   Google Scholar
• *Nejković, D., and J. Bošnjak. 2020. “Needs Analysis in English for Security Studies.” Scripta Manent 15 (2): 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• *Nenko, Y., V. Yaryhina, and V. Vorona. 2021. “Examining Officers’ Readiness for Foreign Language Intercourse in International Operations.” Revista Práxis Educacional 17 (46): 465–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niculescu, B.-O., G. Obilişteanu, and I. A. Dragomir. 2019. “Contribution of Foreign Languages to Building the Professional Career of the Land Forces Academy Cadets.” Land Forces Academy Review 24 (3): 213–219.
   Google Scholar
• *Nilsson, D., and S. Lundqvist. 2022. “Identifying Weaknesses of CLIL in the Military Higher Education Classroom.” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes 10 (2): 217–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Noguera-Díaz, Y., and P. Pérez-Paredes. 2019. “Register Analysis and ESP Pedagogy: Noun-Phrase Modification in a Corpus of English for Military Navy Submariners.” English for Specific Purposes 53:118–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Orna-Montesinos, C. 2013. “English as an International Language in the Military: A Study of Attitudes.” Language for Special Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition 4 (1): 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• *Orna-Montesinos, C. 2018a. “Language Practices and Policies in Conflict: An ELF Perspective on International Military Communication.” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 7 (1): 89–111.
   Google Scholar
• Orna-Montesinos, C. 2018b. “Perceptions Towards Intercultural Communication: Military Students in a Higher Education Context.” In Using English as a Lingua Franca in Education in Europe, edited by Z. Tatsioka, B. Seidlhofer, N. C. Sifakis, and G. Ferguson, 225–249. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, F. L., and L. Plonsky. 2010. “Meta-Analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 85–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Park, K. 2016. “Employing TBLT at a Military-Service Academy in Korea: Learners’ Reactions to and Necessary Adaptation of TBLT.” English Teaching 71 (4): 105–139.
   Google Scholar
• *Park, M. 2020. “Investigating Target Tasks, Task Phases, and Indigenous Criteria for Military Aviation English Assessment.” Language Assessment Quarterly 17 (4): 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteet, S., P. Xue, J. Patel, A. Kao, C. Giammanco, and I. Whiteley. 2008. Linguistic Sources of Coalition Miscommunication. NATO HFM-138 Research Task Group: Adaptability in Coalition Teamwork, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10098436/.
   Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, I., P. Haddington, and A. Kamunen. 2023. “Nudging Questions as Devices for Prompting Courses of Action and Negotiating Deontic (A)Symmetry in UN Military Observer Training.” In Complexity of Interaction: Studies in Multimodal Conversation Analysis, edited by P. Haddington, T. Eilittä, A. Kamunen, L. Kohonen-Aho, I. Rautiainen, and A. Vatanen, 217–252. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and T. S. Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Solak, E. 2014. “English Learning Strategies of Various Nations: A Study in Military Context.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Journal of Education 29 (2): 228–239.
   Google Scholar
• *Sovhar, O. 2021. “Using ICT to Form Foreign Language Communicative Competence of Future Armed Forces Officers.” Information Technologies and Learning Tools 85 (5): 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Synytsya, K., and G. Keremidchieva. 2011. “Language Assistance to Multinational Partners in Coalition Operations.” Information & Security 27: 111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Szvircsev Tresch, T., and N. Picciano. 2007. Effectiveness Within NATO’s Multicultural Military Operations (Cultural Challenges in Military Operations, Issue. C. M. Coops & T. S. Tresch. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep10333.5.
   Google Scholar
• University of the Bundeswehr Munich. n.d. Compulsory Language Training. https://www.unibw.de/sprachenzentrum-en/compulsory-language.
   Google Scholar
• *Velikova, G. 2019. “Shortening in the Language of the Navy.” Foreign Language Teaching 46 (5): 488–497.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, H.-G. 2017. “De-escalation—A Cultural-Linguistic View on Military English and Military Conflicts.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by F. Sharifian, 683–702. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., and M. Watson. 2019. “Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 39 (1): 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar