Escaping the Isomorphic Bias: Towards a Legitimacy-Centered Approach to State-Building

References

• Andrews, Matthew. 2009. Isomorphism and the Limits to African Public Financial Management Reform: HKS Faculty Research. Working Paper Series RWP09-2012. Harvard: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, Friedrich, and Anna Richter. 2009. “Steuerung durch diskursive Praktiken.” In Weiche Steuerung, edited by Gerhard Göhler, Ulrike Höppner, and Sybille De La Rosa, 27–73. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Asia Foundation. 2009. Afghanistan in 2009. A Survey of the Afghan People. Kabul: The Asia Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Asia Foundation. 2012. Afghanistan in 2012. A Survey of the Afghan People. Kabul: The Asia Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat, Sultan, Mark Evans, and Steven A. Zyck. 2012. “Karzai’s Curse – Legitimacy as Stability in Afghanistan and Other Post-Conflict Environments.” Policy Studies 33 (5): 439–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix, Daniel, and Ruth Stanley. 2008. “Deconstructing Local Ownership of Security Sector Reform: A Review of the Literature.” African Security Review 17 (2): 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Böhnke, Jan R., Jan Köhler, and Christoph M. Zürcher. 2017. “State Formation as It Happens: Insights from a Repeated Cross-sectional Study in Afghanistan, 2007–2015.” Conflict, Security & Development 17: 91–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Thomas Risse. 2016. “Dysfunctional State Institutions, Trust, and Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood.” Regulation and Governance 10 (2): 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Vera van Hüllen. 2014. “State-Building and the European Union’s Fight Against Corruption in the Southern Caucasus: Why Legitimacy Matters.” Governance 27 (4): 613–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, Eva, and Stefan Jonsson. 2008. “Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royson Greenwood, Christina Oliver, Roy Suddaby and Kerstin Shalin, 78–98. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2001a. Antrag der Bundesregierung. Einsatz bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte bei der Unterstützung der gemeinsamen Reaktion auf terroristische Angriffe gegen die USA auf Grundlage des Artikels 51 der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und des Artikels 5 des Nordatlantikvertrags sowie der Resolution 1368 (2001) und 1373 (2001) des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 14/7296. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2001b. Antrag der Bundesregierung. Beteiligung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte an dem Einsatz einer Internationalen Sicherheitsunterstützungstruppe in Afghanistan auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001), 1383 (2001) und 1378 (2001) des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 14/7930. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2002. Fortsetzung des Einsatzes bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte bei der Unterstützung der gemeinsamen Reaktion auf terroristische Angriffe gegen die USA auf Grundlage des Artikels 51 der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und des Artikels 5 des Nordatlantikvertrags sowie der Resolutionen 1368 (2001) und 1373 (2001) des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 15/37. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2003. Fortsetzung und Erweiterung der Beteiligung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte an dem Einsatz einer Internationalen Sicherheitsunterstützungstruppe in Afghanistan auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001) vom 20. Dezember 2001, 1413 (2002) vom 23. Mai 2002, 1444 (2002) vom 27. November 2002 und 1510 (2003) vom 13. Oktober 2003 des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 15/1700. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2004. Fortsetzung des Einsatzes bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte bei der Unterstützung der gemeinsamen Reaktion auf terroristische Angriffe gegen die USA auf Grundlage des Artikels 51 der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und des Artikels 5 des Nordatlantikvertrags sowie der Resolutionen 1368 (2001) und 1373 (2001) des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 15/4032. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2006a. Fortsetzung des Einsatzes bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte bei der Unterstützung der gemeinsamen Reaktion auf terroristische Angriffe gegen die USA auf Grundlage des Artikels 51 der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und des Artikels 5 des Nordatlantikvertrags sowie der Resolutionen 1368 (2001) und 1373 (2001) des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 16/3150. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2006b. Fortsetzung der Beteiligung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte an dem Einsatz der Internationalen Sicherheitsunterstützungstruppe in Afghanistan unter Führung der NATO auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001) vom 20. Dezember 2001, 1413 (2002) vom 23. Mai 2002, 1444 (2002) vom 27. November 2002, 1510 (2003) vom 13. Oktober 2003, 1563 (2004) vom 17. September 2004, 1623 (2005) vom 13. September 2005 und 1707 (2006) vom 12. September 2006 des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. Drucksache 16/2573. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2006c. Polizeihilfe für Afghanistan. Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Birgit Homburger, Dr. Max Stadler, Jens Ackermann, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der FDP. Drucksache 16/871. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2006d. Das Afghanistan-Konzept der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2007. Das Afghanistan-Konzept der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2008. Das Afghanistan-Konzept der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2010. Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan zur Unterrichtung des Deutschen Bundestags. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2011. Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan zur Unterrichtung des Deutschen Bundestags. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• BReg (Bundesregierung). 2014. Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan zur Unterrichtung des Deutschen Bundestags. Berlin: Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• Breul, Rainer. 2005. “Organizational Learning in International Organizations. The Case of UN Peace Operations.” (M.A. thesis). University of Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Brozus, Lars, Christian Jetzlsperger, and Gregor Walter-Drop. 2018. “Policy Implications.” In Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood, edited by Thomas Risse, Tanja Börzel and Anke Draude, 584–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Suzanna, David Chandler, and Meera Sabaratnam, eds. 2011. A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ciorciari, John D., and Stephen D. Krasner 2018. “Contracting Out, Legitimacy and State Building.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 484–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, Katharina. 2017. “The Legitimacy Audience Shapes the Coalition: Lessons from Afghanistan, 2001.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (3): 339–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denney, Lisa. 2014. Justice and Security Reform. Development Agencies and Informal Institutions in Sierra Leone. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for International Development. 2016. Building Stability Framework. London: Department for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draude, Anke, Cord Schmelzle, and Thomas Risse. 2012. “Grundbegriffe der Governanceforschung.” SFB Governance Working Paper Series 36: 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, Bruce. 2009. The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gizelis, Theodora-Ismene, and Jonathan Joseph. 2016. “Decoupling Local Ownership? The Lost Opportunities for Grassroots Women’s Involvement in Liberian Peacebuilding.” Cooperation and Conflict 51 (5): 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDPS (International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding). 2011. A New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States. Busan: IDPS.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, Abdirashid. 2016. “The Political Economy of State Failure: A Social Contract Approach.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (4): 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, Steven, and Thomas Risse. 2014. “External Actors, State-Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction.” Governance 27 (4): 545–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas. 2009. “Statebuilding without Nation-Building? Legitimacy, State Failure and the Limits of the Institutionalist Approach.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3 (1): 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Margaret, Audrey Sacks, and Tom R. Tyler. 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (3): 354–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, Michael. 2007. “Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy?” European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2013. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, Claire. 2018. “When the Virtuous Circle Unravels: Unfair Service Provision and State De-Legitimation in Divided Societies.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 527–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRD and CSO (Ministry of Rehabilitation and Development and Central Statistics Office). “The National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment 2005. Kabul.” CSO. Accessed August 2, 2017. http://cso.gov.af/en/page/1500/1494/nrav-report.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Edward, Roland Paris, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2009. New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. New York: United Nations University.
   Google Scholar
• Nijat, Aarya, Kristóf Gosztonyi, Basir Feda, and Jan Köhler. 2016. Sub-National Governance in Afghanistan: The State of Affairs and the Future of District and Village Representation. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. The Accra Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD. Accessed August 2, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD. Accessed August 2, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, Lant, and Frauke de Weijer. 2010. Fragile States: Stuck in a Capability Trap. World Development Report 2011 Background Paper. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Hannah. 2006. ‘Local Ownership’ in Conflict Transformation Projects. Partnership, Participation or Patronage? Berghof Occasional Paper No. 27. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. 2013. “Failed Statebuilding Versus Peace Formation.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (3): 378–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas. 2011. Governance without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlöndorf, Elisabeth. 2011. Against the Odds. Successful UN Peace Operations – A Theoretical Argument and Two Cases. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schmelzle, Cord. 2011. “Evaluating Governance: Effectiveness and Legitimacy in Areas of Limited Statehood.” SFB-Governance Working Paper Series 26: 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schmelzle, Cord, and Eric Stollenwerk. 2018. “Virtuous or Vicious Circle? Governance Effectiveness and Legitimacy in Areas of Limited Statehood.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, Ursula, Fairlie Chappuis, and Deniz Kocak. 2014. “Security Sector Reform and the Emergence of Hybrid Security Governance.” International Peacekeeping 21 (2): 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Richard. 1994. “Institutions and Organizations. Toward a Theoretical Synthesis.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism, edited by Richard Scott, and John W. Meyer, 55–80. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stabilisation Unit. 2014. The UK Government’s Approach to Stabilisation. London: Stabilisation Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Stollenwerk, Eric. 2018. “Securing Legitimacy? Perceptions of Security and ISAF’s Legitimacy in Northeast Afghanistan.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 506–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNAMA, United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. 2016. Afghanistan. Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. Annual Report 2016. Kabul: United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2003. Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Kabul: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• von Billerbeck, Sarah. 2015. “Local Ownership and UN Peacebuilding: Discourse Versus Operationalization.” Global Governance 21 (2): 299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Billerbeck, Sarah. 2017. Whose Peace? Local Ownership and United Nations Peacekeeping. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• von Billerbeck, Sarah, and Birte Julia Gippert. 2017. “Legitimacy in Conflict: Concepts, Practices, Challenges.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (3): 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westendorf, Jasmine-Kim. 2018. “Challenges of Local Ownership: Understanding the Outcomes of the International Community’s ‘Light Footprint’ Approach to the Nepal Peace Process.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (2): 228–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, Matthew, Simone Dietrich, and Minhaj Mahmud. 2018. “Aiding the Virtuous Circle? International Development Assistance and Citizen Confidence in Government in Bangladesh.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 468–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. World Development Report. Conflict, Security and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zaum, Dominik, ed. 2013. Legitimating International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaum, Dominik. 2016. “Legitimacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations, edited by Jacob Katz, Ian Hurd, and Ian Johnstone. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1107–1125.
   Google Scholar