The Social Structures of Interventions: Projects, International Organizations and Border Security in Central Asia

References

• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2011. “On a Field Trip with Bourdieu.” International Political Sociology 5: 327–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00137_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrijasevic, Rutvica, and William Walters. 2010. “The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 977–999. doi: 10.1068/d1509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, Jan. 2012. “Governmentality and Counterterrorism: Appropriating International Security Projects in Kenya.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (1): 41–56. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2012.655558
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World : International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckfield, Jason. 2010. “The Social Structure of the World Polity.” American Journal of Sociology 115: 1018–1068. doi: 10.1086/649577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Jacqueline. 2012. “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in International Organizations: A History of Debating IMF Conditionality1.” International Studies Quarterly 56: 674–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2011. “Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices.” Practices of Power. International Political Sociology 5: 225–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2016. “Sociology of Transnational Guilds.” International Political Sociology 10: 398–416. doi: 10.1093/ips/olw022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, John, and George M. Thomas. 1997. “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization.” American Sociological Review 62: 171–190. doi: 10.2307/2657298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1971. “Genèse et Structure Du Champ Religieux.” Revue française de sociologie 12: 295–334. doi: 10.2307/3320234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. La noblesse d’Etat: grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. “Esprits d’Etat [Genèse et structure du champ bureaucratique].” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 96: 49–62. doi: 10.3406/arss.1993.3040
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1994. Raisons pratiques: sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. “De La Maison Du Roi à La Raison d’État.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 118: 55–68. doi: 10.3406/arss.1997.3222
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Les structures sociales de l’économie. Paris: Points.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2011. Sur l’État: cours au Collège de France, 1989–1992. Paris: Raisons d’agir & Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Monique de Saint Martin. 1978. “Le Patronat.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 20–21: 3–82. doi: 10.3406/arss.1978.2592
   Google Scholar
• Buchet de Neuilly, Yves. 2005. L’Europe de la politique étrangère. Paris: Économica.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Antonin. 2013. “The Genesis of Europe: Competing Elites and the Emergence of a European Field of Power.” In Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security, edited by Mikael Rask Madsen and Niilo Kauppi, 103–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Antonin. 2018. “Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, edited by Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz, 1–58. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, Alexander. 2010. “Outsourcing Authority : How Project Contracts Transform Global Governance Networks.” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, 238–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniecka, Katarzyna, and John Heathershaw. 2011. “Security Assistance and Border Management.” In The European Union and Central Asia, Routledge Advances in Central Asian Studies, edited by Alexander Warkotsch, 77–101. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delcourt, Barbara. 2015. “The Rule of Law as a Vehicle for Intervention.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (4): 471–494. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1087193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Yves, Didier Bigo, and Antonin Cohen. 2015. “Enquêter sur l’internationalisation des noblesses d’État. Retour réflexif sur des stratégies de double jeu.” Cultures & Conflits: 15–52. doi: 10.4000/conflits.18987
   Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant G. Garth. 2011. “Hegemonic Battles, Professional Rivalries, and the International Division of Labor in the Market for the Import and Export of State-Governing Expertise.” International Political Sociology 5: 276–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, Marc G. 2016. “Global Assemblages of Security Governance and Contemporary International Intervention.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (1): 116–132. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1054656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas, and Manfred Elsig. 2011. “Principals, Agents, and the European Union’s Foreign Economic Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 18: 323–338. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.551066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Qadim, Nora. 2014. “Postcolonial Challenges to Migration Control: French–Moroccan Cooperation Practices on Forced Returns.” Security Dialogue 45: 242–261. doi: 10.1177/0967010614533139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, Norbert. 2000. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Rev. ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Shoshana. 2017. Borders and Mobility in Turkey: Governing Souls and States. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frowd, Philippe M. 2017. “The Promises and Pitfalls of Biometric Security Practices in Senegal.” International Political Sociology 11: 343–359. doi: 10.1093/ips/olx015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, Didier, and Frédéric Lebaron. 2018. “Yanis (Varoufakis), the Minotaur, and the Field of Eurocracy.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 43: 216–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, Didier, and Jay Rowell. 2013. “Introduction: Studying Eurocracy as a Bureaucratic Field.” In The Field of Eurocracy, European Administrative Governance Series, edited by Didier Georgakakis and Jay Rowell. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Accessed January 24, 2017. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137294708_1.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrieder, Tine. 2014. “Local Orders in International Organisations: The World Health Organization’s Global Programme on AIDS.” Journal of International Relations and Development 17: 220–241. doi: 10.1057/jird.2013.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensell, Stephan. 2015. “Coordinating Intervention: International Actors and Local ‘Partners’ Between Ritual and Decoupling.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (1): 89–111. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2014.976359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Nicole J. 2005. “The Trafficking of Narcotics, Arms and Humans in Post-Soviet Central Asia: (Mis)Perceptions, Policies and Realities.” Central Asian Survey 24: 39–52. doi: 10.1080/02634930500050040
   Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, Julien. 2015. “Intervention and Subversion: The EU Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (4): 442–470. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1087194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo Beerli, Monique. 2018. “Saving the Saviors: Security Management as a Struggle for Humanitarian Power.” International Political Sociology 12: 70–87. doi: 10.1093/ips/olx023
   Google Scholar
• Kanninen, Tapio, and Touko Piiparinen. 2014. “Why Bureaucracies Matter in the Global Age: A Post-Weberian Explanation with the Case Study of Preparing and Implementing the United Nations’ An Agenda for Peace.” International Relations 28: 46–66. doi: 10.1177/0047117813493308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, Niilo, and Mikael R. Madsen. 2014. “Fields of Global Governance: How Transnational Power Elites Can Make Global Governance Intelligible.” International Political Sociology 8: 324–330. doi: 10.1111/ips.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1974. “Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations.” World Politics 27: 39–62. doi: 10.2307/2009925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, Christoph. 2015. “Diverging Expectations and Perceptions of Peacebuilding? Local Owners’ and External Actors’ Interactions in Guinea-Bissau’s Security Sector Reforms.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9: 334–352. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1070023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogstad, Erlend Grøner. 2014. “Local Ownership as Dependence Management: Inviting the Coloniser Back.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 8 (2–3): 105–125. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2014.901030
   Google Scholar
• Lapid, Yosef. 2001. “Introduction. Identities, Borders, Orders: Nudging International Relations Theory in a New Direction.” In Identities, Borders, Orders : Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by Yosef Lapid, David Jacobson, and Albert Mathias, 1–28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Roux, Brigitte, and Henry Rouanet. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, Mikael Rask, and Niilo Kauppi. 2013. “Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security.” In Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security, edited by Niilo Kauppi and Mikael Rask Madsen, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Mazé, Médéric. 2017. “Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do about It?” International Political Sociology 11: 203–220. doi: 10.1093/ips/olx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Matthew, and David A. Lake. 2006. “The Logic of Delegation to International Organizations.” In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, edited by Darren G. Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney, 341–368. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Megoran, Nick, Gaël Raballand, and Jerome Bouyjou. 2005. “Performance.” Representation and the Economics of Border Control in Uzbekistan. Geopolitics 10: 712–740.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, Helen V. 2006. “Why Multilateralism? Foreign Aid and Domestic Principal-Agent Problems. In Delegation and Agency.” In International Organizations, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, edited by Darren G. Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney, 107–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, Daniel L., and Michael J. Tierney. 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform.” International Organization 57: 241–276. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303572010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, Christian. 2015. “Interventionism as Practice: On ‘Ordinary Transgressions’ and Their Routinization.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (4): 425–441. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1089664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandolfi, Mariella, and Laurence McFalls. 2010. “Global Bureaucracies.” In Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. The Civilization of War, edited by Alessandro Dal Lago and Salvatore Palidda, 171–184. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paragi, Beata. 2016. “Divide et Impera? Foreign Aid Interventions in the Middle East and North Africa Region.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (2): 200–221. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1112493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Madeleine. 2009. “Materialising State Space: ‘Creeping Migration’ and Territorial Integrity in Southern Kyrgyzstan.” Europe-Asia Studies 61: 1277–1313. doi: 10.1080/09668130903068814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandor, Adam. 2016. “Border Security and Drug Trafficking in Senegal: AIRCOP and Global Security Assemblages.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (4): 490–512. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2016.1240425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, David. 2013. Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorez, Julien. 2011. “Les nouvelles frontières de l’Asie centrale : États, nations et régions en recomposition.” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. Accessed July 6, 2012. http://cybergeo.revues.org/23707.
   Google Scholar
• Torpey, John. 2000. “States and the Regulation of Migration in the Twentieth-Century North Atlantic World.” In The Wall Around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, edited by Peter Andreas, Timothy Snyder, and Md Lanham, 31–52. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Vaubel, Roland. 2006. “Principal-Agent Problems in International Organizations.” The Review of International Organizations 1: 125–138. doi: 10.1007/s11558-006-8340-z
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Andrew P., and Berhanu Mengistu. 2014. “An Exploration of the Limitations of Bureaucratic Organizations in Implementing Contemporary Peacebuilding.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/0010836714532915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar