From Hybridity to Networked Relationality: Actors, Ideologies and the Legacies of Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement

References

• ACLED. 2015. ACLED Country Report Sudan and South Sudan. http://www.acleddata.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ACLED-Country-Report_Sudan-and-South-Sudan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ali, Nadje, and Latif Tas. 2017. “‘War Is Like a Blanket’ Feminist Convergences in Kurdish and Turkish Women’s Rights Activism for Peace.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 13 (3): 354–375. doi:10.1215/15525864-4179001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Matthew G., and Sinclair Dinnen. 2017. “Is the ‘Hybrid Turn’ a ‘Spatial Turn’? A Geographical Perspective on Hybridity and State-Formation in the Western Pacific.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 500–517. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1396910.
   Google Scholar
• Assal, Munzoul A. M. 2016. Civil Society and Peace Building in Sudan: A Critical Look. Working paper. Chr. Michelsen Institute. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2475336.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, Mona. 2006. “Land and Conflict in Sudan.” In Peace by Piece: Addressing Sudan’s Conflicts, edited by Mark Simmons, and Peter Dixon. Conciliation Resources (Organization). http://www.c-r.org/accord/sudan.
   Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol, and Xavier Mathieu. 2018. “Beyond Silence, Obstacle and Stigma: Revisiting the ‘Problem’ of Difference in Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (3): 283–299. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1513622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol, and Elisa Randazzo. 2018. “Hybrid Peace Revisited: An Opportunity for Considering Self-Governance?” Third World Quarterly 39 (8): 1543–1560. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1447849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto. 2012. “Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance.” Global Governance 18 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, Anna. 2013. Dynamics of Relations Between Different Actors When Building Peace The Role of Hybridity and Culture. Berlin: Berghof Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, W. J. 2017. Hasan Al-Turabi: Islamist Politics and Democracy in Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clements, and Anna Nolan. 2008. On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States : State Formation in the Context of ‘Fragility.’. Berghof Forschungszentrum für Konstruktive Konfliktbearbeitung. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2595/.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, and Patricia Rinck. 2019. “The Local/International Interface in Peacebuilding: Experiences From Bougainville and Sierra Leone.” International Peacekeeping 26 (2): 216–239. doi:10.1080/13533312.2018.1561185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Daniel J. Brass, and Daniel S. Halgin. 2014. “Social Network Research: Confusions, Criticisms, and Controversies.” Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks 40: 1–29. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/S0733-558X%282014%290000040001.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323 (5916): 892–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan. 2013. “Relational Sensibility in Peacebuilding: Emancipation, Tyranny, or Transformation?” In Relational Sensibility and the “Turn to the Local”: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, edited by Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger, 12–18. Duisburg, Germany: Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK / GCR21). http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:324372.
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan. 2018. “Relational and Essential: Theorizing Difference for Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (3): 352–366. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1482078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosché, Johan, and Allard Duursma. 2018. “Hurdles to Peace: A Level-of-Analysis Approach to Resolving Sudan’s Civil Wars.” Third World Quarterly 39 (3): 560–576. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1333417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. Anne. 2017. “Hybridity and Dialogue – Approaches to the Hybrid Turn.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 446–463. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1353893.
   Google Scholar
• Brusset, Emery, Cedric De Coning, and Bryn Hughes. 2016. Complexity Thinking for Peacebuilding Practice and Evaluation. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casciarri, Barbara, and Stefano Manfredi. 2020. Freedom, Peace and Justice: A Glossary of the Third Sudanese Revolution. Working Paper 2. Arabité, Islamité, ‘Soudanité’ - Being Arab, Muslim,. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02511485/document.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2004. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society.” International Journal of Communication 1 (1): 29.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2010. The Power of Identity. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2011a. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2011b. “A Network Theory of Power.” International Journal of Communication 5: 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Wren, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger. 2013. “The (Liberal) Emperor’s New Clothes? Relational Sensibility and the Future of Peacebuilding.” In Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, edited by Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger, 6–12. Duisburg, Germany: Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK / GCR21). Global Dialogues 2. https://inef.uni-due.de/cms/files/globaldialogues2_web_01.pdf#page=5.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2012. “Resilience and Human Security: The Post-Interventionist Paradigm.” Security Dialogue 43 (3): 213–229. doi:10.1177/0967010612444151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, Nick. 2010. Towards Relational Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Coning, Cedric. 2018. “Adaptive Peacebuilding.” International Affairs 94 (2): 301–317. doi:10.1093/ia/iix251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal, Alex. 2017. “Peace and the Security Sector in Sudan, 2002–11.” African Security Review 26 (2): 180–198. doi:10.1080/10246029.2017.1297582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario, and Doug McAdam. 2003. Social Movements and Networks : Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnen, Sinclair, and Lia Kent. 2015. Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development: A Critical Interrogation 2015/50. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• El Battahani, Atta. 2006. “A Complex Web: Politics and Conflict in Sudan.” In Peace by Piece: Addressing Sudan’s Conflicts, edited by Mark Simmons, and Peter Dixon. Conciliation Resources (Organization). http://www.c-r.org/accord/sudan.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317. doi:10.1086/231209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Jeff Goodwin. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1411–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, Miranda. 2017. “Using the Concept of Hybridity to Guide Social Change Through Legal Means.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 481–499. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1361794.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, Miranda, Lia Kent, Sinclair Dinnen, Joanne Wallis, and Srinjoy Bose. 2017. “Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development: A Critical Approach.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 407–421. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1448717.
   Google Scholar
• George, Nicole, and Lia Kent. 2017. “Sexual Violence and Hybrid Peacebuilding: How Does Silence ‘Speak’?” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 518–537. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1395710.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, Paul. 1994. “Black Cultural Politics: An Interview with Paul Gilroy by Timmy Lott.” Found Object 4: 46–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, Paul. 2013. Between Camps: Nations, Cultures and the Allure of Race. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1996. “‘When Was the “Postcolonial”: Thinking at the Limit’.” In The Post-Colonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons, edited by Iain Chambers, and Lidia Curti, 242–261. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, Shahar, and Lee Jones. 2015. Governing Borderless Threats: Non-Traditional Security and the Politics of State Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, Shahar, and Lee Jones. 2018. “Beyond Hybridity to the Politics of Scale: International Intervention and ‘Local’ Politics.” Development and Change 48 (1): 54–77. doi:10.1111/dech.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John. 2013. “Towards Better Theories of Peacebuilding: Beyond the Liberal Peace Debate.” Peacebuilding 1 (2): 275–282. doi:10.1080/21647259.2013.783260.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Charles T. 2017. “Beyond the Binaries: Towards a Relational Approach to Peacebuilding.” Global Change, Peace & Security 29 (3): 209–227. doi:10.1080/14781158.2017.1360855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, Charles T. 2018. “Hybridity Revisited: Relational Approaches to Peacebuilding in Complex Sociopolitical Orders.” In Hybridity on the Ground in Peacebuilding and Development: Critical Conversations, edited by Joanne Wallis, Lia Kent, Miranda Forsyth, Sinclair Dinnen, and Srinjoy Bose, 1st ed., 51–65. Sydney: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hussien, Muawya, and Robert A. Dibie. 2017. “Business and Government Relations in Sudan.” In Business and Government Relations in Africa, edited by Robert A. Dibie, 162–195. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutnyk, John. 2005. “Hybridity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 79–102. doi:10.1080/0141987042000280021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Paul, and Peter Albrecht. 2018. “Power, Politics and Hybridity.” In Hybridity on the Ground in Peacebuilding and Development: Critical Conversations, edited by Joanne Wallis, Lia Kent, Miranda Forsyth, Sinclair Dinnen, and Srinjoy Bose, 37–49. Sydney: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarstad, Anna K., and Louise Olsson. 2012. “Hybrid Peace Ownership in Afghanistan: International Perspectives of Who Owns What and When.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (1): 105–119. doi:10.5555/1075-2846-18.1.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Hilde F. 2011. Waging Peace in Sudan: The Inside Story of the Negotiations That Ended Africa’s Longest Civil War. Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Douglas H. 2013. “New Sudan or South Sudan? The Multiple Meanings of Self-Determination in Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement.” Civil Wars 15 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1080/13698249.2013.817850.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Jonathan. 2018. “Beyond Relationalism in Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (3): 425–434. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1515608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler, Stefanie. 2014. Local Agency and Peacebuilding: EU and International Engagement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cyprus and South Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, Hannah, Mike Savage, and Penny Harvey. 2006. “Social Networks and the Study of Relations: Networks as Method, Metaphor and Form.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 113–140. doi:10.1080/03085140500465899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korybko, Andrew. 2018. “The Sudan, Africa’s Longest Civil War: The Peace Deal Proves That South Sudan Is a Failed Concept.” Global Research. June. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-sudan-africas-longest-civil-war-the-peace-deal-proves-that-south-sudan-is-a-failed-concept/5645658.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, David J., and Andréa Belliger. 2014. Interpreting Networks: Hermeneutics, Actor-Network Theory & New Media. Bliefield: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kuol, Luka Biong D. 2020. “South Sudan: The Elusive Quest for a Resilient Social Contract?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 14 (1): 64–83. doi:10.1080/17502977.2019.1627692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffey, Mark, and Suthaharan Nadarajah. 2012. “The Hybridity of Liberal Peace: States, Diasporas and Insecurity.” Security Dialogue 43 (5): 403–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Sung Yong. 2015. “Motivations for Local Resistance in International Peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly 36 (8): 1437–1452. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1052063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, Martin Ola, and Joakim Öjendal. 2018. “Atomised and Subordinated? Unpacking the Role of International Involvement in ‘the Local Turn’ of Peacebuilding in Nepal and Cambodia.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 13 (2): 16–30. doi:10.1080/15423166.2018.1470023.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230307032.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver Richmond. 2013. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver Richmond. 2016. “The Fallacy of Constructing Hybrid Political Orders: A Reappraisal of the Hybrid Turn in Peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 23 (2): 219–239. doi:10.1080/13533312.2015.1099440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin de Almagro, Maria. 2018. “Hybrid Clubs: A Feminist Approach to Peacebuilding in the Democratic Republic of Congo.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (3): 319–334. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1482125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, Laura. 2015. “A Feminist Approach to Hybridity: Understanding Local and International Interactions in Producing Post-Conflict Gender Security.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (1): 48–69. doi:10.1080/17502977.2014.980112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, Laura, and Maria O’Reilly. 2019. “Critical Peace and Conflict Studies: Feminist Interventions.” Peacebuilding 7 (2): 127–145. doi:10.1080/21647259.2019.1588457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. 2014. “Disaggregating Hybridity Why Hybrid Institutions Do Not Produce Predictable Experiences of Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (4): 501–514. doi:10.1177/0022343313519465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. 2016. “Respecting Complexity: Compound Friction and Unpredictability in Peacebuilding.” In Peacebuilding and Friction : Global and Local Encounters in Post Conflict-Societies, edited by Annika Björkdahl, Kristine Höglund, Gearoid Millar, Jair van der Lijn, and Willemijn Verkoren, 32–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mische, Ann. 2011. “Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by John Scott, and Peter J. Carrington, 80–97. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Audra. 2011. “Quality/Control: International Peace Interventions and ‘the Everyday.’.” Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1623–1645. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, Louise Wiuff, and Finn Stepputat. 2018. “Introduction: Peacebuilding in an Era of Pragmatism.” International Affairs 94 (2): 293–299. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morray, Elisabeth B., and Belle Liang. 2005. “Peace Talk: A Relational Approach to Group Negotiation among Arab and Israeli Youths.” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 55 (4): 481–506. doi:10.1521/ijgp.2005.55.4.481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Suthaharan, and David Rampton. 2015. “The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace.” Review of International Studies 41 (01): 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Natsios, Andrew S. 2012. Sudan, South Sudan, and Darfur: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. 2015. “Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research.” Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 857–874. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. 2002. “International Peacebuilding and the ‘Mission Civilisatrice.’.” Review of International Studies 28 (04): 637–656.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Jenny H. 2012. “A Conceptual Unpacking Of Hybridity: Accounting For Notions Of Power, Politics And Progress In Analyses Of Aid-Driven Interfaces.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (2): 9–22. doi:10.1080/15423166.2012.742802.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. 1994. “Globalisation as Hybridisation.” International Sociology 9 (2): 161–184. doi:10.1177/026858094009002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pile, Steve. 1994. “Masculinism, the Use of Dualistic Epistemologies and Third Spaces*.” Antipode 26 (3): 255–277. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1994.tb00251.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popplewell, Rowan. 2019. “Civil Society, Hybridity and Peacebuilding in Burundi: Questioning Authenticity.” Third World Quarterly 40 (1): 129–146. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1432347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver. 2015. “The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive?” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 50–68. doi:10.1177/0010836714537053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver. 2019. “Peace and the Formation of Political Order.” International Peacekeeping 26 (1): 85–110. doi:10.1080/13533312.2018.1511374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver, and Audra Mitchell. 2011. “Peacebuilding and Critical Forms of Agency From Resistance to Subsistence.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 36 (4): 326–344. doi:10.1177/0304375411432099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riles, Annelise. 2001. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolandsen, Øystein H. 2011. “A Quick Fix? A Retrospective Analysis of the Sudan Comprehensive Peace Agreement.” Review of African Political Economy 38 (130): 551–564. doi:10.1080/03056244.2011.630869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron, Amit. 2009. “Peace Negotiations and Peace Talks: The Peace Process in the Public Sphere.” International Journal of Peace Studies 14 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera. 2013. “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace.” Security Dialogue 44 (3): 259–278. doi:10.1177/0967010613485870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schia, Niels Nagelhus, and John Karlsrud. 2013. “‘Where the Rubber Meets the Road’: Friction Sites and Local-Level Peacebuilding in Haiti, Liberia and South Sudan.” International Peacekeeping 20 (2): 233–248. doi:10.1080/13533312.2013.791581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter, Michael, and Jeremy Ive. 2018. “A Relational Approach to Peacebuilding in the Korean Peninsula.” International Bulletin of Mission Research 42 (2): 152–161. doi:10.1177/2396939318757672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Anish Kumar. 2015. “At Four Years Old, South Sudan Is the ‘World’s Most Failed State.’.” Atlantic Council, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/at-four-years-old-south-sudan-is-the-world-s-most-failed-state/.
   Google Scholar
• Simangan, Dahlia. 2018. “When Hybridity Breeds Contempt: Negative Hybrid Peace in Cambodia.” Third World Quarterly 39 (8): 1525–1542. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1438184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Claire. 2014. “Illiberal Peace-Building in Hybrid Political Orders: Managing Violence During Indonesia’s Contested Political Transition.” Third World Quarterly 35 (8): 1509–1528. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.946277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørbø, Gunnar M. 2004. Peacebuilding in Post-War Situations: Lessons for Sudan. Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute, Development Studies and Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Sharath. 2014. “Negotiating Violence: Sudan’s Peacemakers and the War in Darfur.” African Affairs 113 (450): 24–44. doi:10.1093/afraf/adt072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2012. “Post-Conflict Justice and Hybridity in Peacebuilding.” In Hybrid Forms of Peace, edited by Oliver Richmond, and Audra Mitchell, 58–72. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Villiers, Shirley de. 2015. “An Overview of Conflict in Africa in 2014.” African Security Review 24 (1): 89–100. doi:10.1080/10246029.2015.1011867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visoka, Gëzim, and Oliver Richmond. 2017. “After Liberal Peace? From Failed State-Building to an Emancipatory Peace in Kosovo.” International Studies Perspectives 18 (1): 110–129. doi:10.1093/isp/ekw006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne, Renee Jeffery, and Lia Kent. 2016. “Political Reconciliation in Timor Leste, Solomon Islands and Bougainville: The Dark Side of Hybridity.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70 (2): 159–178. doi:10.1080/10357718.2015.1113231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne, and Oliver Richmond. 2017. “From Constructivist to Critical Engagements with Peacebuilding: Implications for Hybrid Peace.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (4): 422–445. doi:10.1080/23802014.2016.1309990.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, Barry. 1997. “Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance.” Contemporary Studies in Sociology 15: 19–61.
   Google Scholar
• White, Harrison C., Jan Fuhse, Matthias Thiemann, and Larissa Buchholz. 2007. “Networks and Meaning: Styles and Switchings.” Soziale Systeme 13 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ylönen, Aleksi. 2016. “Reflections on Peacebuilding Interventionism: State- and Nationbuilding Dilemmas in Southern Sudan (2005 to the Present).” Global Change, Peace & Security 28 (2): 213–223. doi:10.1080/14781158.2016.1159548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Robert JC. 1994. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, John. 2005. “Sudan: A Flawed Peace Process Leading to a Flawed Peace.” Review of African Political Economy 32 (103): 99–113. doi:10.1080/03056240500121008.
   Google Scholar
• Zanker, Franzisca. 2017. “Moving Beyond Hybridity: The Multi-Scalar Adaptation of Community Policing in Liberia.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (2): 166–185. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1248619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaum, Dominik. 2012. “Beyond the ‘Liberal Peace.’.” Global Governance 18 (1): 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar