What Difference Does it Make? UN Peacekeeping’s Impact on Civil-Military Relations in Troop-Contributing Countries

References

• Abiola, Seun, Cedric de Coning, Eduarda Hamann, and Chander Prakash. 2017. “The Large Contributors and UN Peacekeeping Doctrine.” In UN Peacekeeping Doctrine in a New Era: Adapting to Stabilisation, Protection and New Threats, edited by Cedric de Coning, Chiyuki Aoi, and John Karlsrud, 152–186. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Agência Brasil. 2017. Lei transfere para Justiça Militar julgamento de crimes contra civis. http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/internacional/noticia/2017-10/sancionado-projeto-que-transfere-julgamento-de-oficiais-para-justica.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar, Jeannette. 2018. “El rol del ejército en la seguridad interna en El Salvador.” In Antología del pensamiento crítico salvadoreño contemporáneo, edited by Loida Mariela Castro, and Roberto Oswaldo López, 519–552. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Akkoyunlu, Karabekir, and José Antonio Lima. 2022. “Brazil’s Stealth Military Intervention.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 14 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1177/1866802X211039860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Holger. 2020. “Diversionary Peace: International Peacekeeping and Domestic Civil-Military Relations.” International Peacekeeping 27 (4): 586–616. doi:10.1080/13533312.2020.1768073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Peter, Fiffi Edu-Afful, and Festus Aubyn. 2021. Two Sides of the Same Coin? International Peacekeeping Shapes Domestic Security in Ghana. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Peter, and Sukanya Podder. 2020. Protection of Civilians from the Perspective of Soldiers who Protect. Ghana and India in United Nations Peacekeeping. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Author interview with Sushant Singh. 2022. Senior Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, via Zoom, 18 February 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bacevich, Andrew J. 2007. “Elusive Bargain. The Pattern of U.S. Civil-Military Relations Since World War II.” In The Long War: A New History of U.S. National Security Policy Since World War II, edited by Andrew J. Bacevich, 207–264. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrucho, Luis. 2020. Brasil de Bolsonaro tem maior proporção de militares como ministros do que Venezuela; especialistas veem riscos. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-51646346.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto, and Francesco N Moro. 2019. “Stability and Stability Operations: Definitions, Drivers, Approaches.” Ethnopolitics 18 (5): 445–461. doi:10.1080/17449057.2019.1640503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez, Raúl. 2007. “América Latina: Operaciones de paz y acciones militares internacionales de las fuerzas armadas.” Foro Internacional 47 (1): 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, Thomas W. 2003. “Can Participation in Peacekeeping Missions Be Beneficial? The Importance of Meaning as a Function of Attitudes and Identity.” In The Psychology of the Peacekeeper: Lessons from the Field, edited by Thomas W. Britt, and Amy B. Adler, 71–88. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Risa. 2019. “Integrating the Civil–Military Relations Subfield.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 379–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060518-025407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Risa, and Peter M Erickson. 2022. “The Sources of Military Dissent: Why and how the US Military Contests Civilian Decisions About the use of Force.” European Journal of International Security 7 (1): 38–57. doi:10.1017/eis.2021.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, Thomas C., and Scott D. Tollefson. 2014. “Civil-Military Relations in Brazil: A Reassessment.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (2): 107–138. doi:10.1177/1866802X1400600204.
   Google Scholar
• Bullion, Alan. 2001. “India in Sierra Leone: A Case of Muscular Peacekeeping?” International Peacekeeping 8 (4): 77–91. doi:10.1080/13533310108413921.
   Google Scholar
• Caforio, Giuseppe, and Maja Garb. 2007. “Effects of the Socialisation Process on the Cultural Attitudes of Future Elites.” In Cultural Differences between the Military and Parent Society in Democratic Countries, edited by Giuseppe Caforio, 83–106. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, Celso, and Adriana Marques. 2019. Missão Haiti: A visão dos force commanders. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2017. “Socialization and Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (5): 592–605. doi:10.1177/0022343317721813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choedon, Yeshi. 2006. “India and the Current Concerns of UN Peacekeeping: Issues and Prospects.” Indian Foreign Affairs Journal 1 (4): 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cockayne, James. 2014. “The Futility of Force? Strategic Lessons for Dealing with Unconventional Armed Groups from the UN’s War on Haiti’s Gangs.” Journal of Strategic Studies 37 (5): 736–769. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.901911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortinhas, Juliano da Silva, and Vitelli, Marina Gisela. 2020. “Limitações das reformas para o controle civil sobre as forças armadas nos governos do PT (2003-2016).” Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Defesa 7 (2): 187–216. doi:10.26792/RBED.v7n2.2020.75239.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, Philip. 2018. “From Peacekeepers to Praetorians – How Participating in Peacekeeping Operations may Subvert Democracy.” International Relations 32 (2): 218–239. doi:10.1177/0047117817740728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, Jan, and Markéta Wittichová. 2020. “Forging Civil–Military Cooperation: Domestic and International Laboratories of CIMIC Knowledge and Practice.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 14 (5): 596–614. doi:10.1080/17502977.2020.1812962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan, Sandeep, and Lotte Vermeij. 2014. Indian Perspectives on the Use of Force and the Growing Robustness of UN Peacekeeping. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Diamint, Rut. 2006. “Democracy and Defense.” Hemisphere 16: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos Parra, Mariana. 2019. “Minustah’s Legitimacy and the ‘Security-First’ Approach: Reassessing Statebuilding and its Violent Features in the Case of Haiti.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13 (4): 480–502. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1558801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, Alan. 2014. “In the Footsteps of Dr Bunche: The Congo, UN Peacekeeping and the Use of Force.” Journal of Strategic Studies 37 (5): 703–735. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.908284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte Villa, Rafael, and Nicole Jenne. 2020. “By all Necessary Means? Emerging Powers and the Use of Force in Peacekeeping.” Contemporary Security Policy 41 (3): 407–431. doi:10.1080/13523260.2019.1698691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, Allard, and John Gledhill. 2019. “Voted out: Regime Type, Elections and Contributions to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (4): 1157–1185. doi:10.1177/1354066119830773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, Maggie. 2015. “Peacekeeping Abroad, Trouble Making at Home: Mutinies in West Africa.” African Affairs 114 (455): 206–225. doi:10.1093/afraf/adv004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter D. 1996. “The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control.” Armed Forces & Society 23 (2): 149–178. doi:10.1177/0095327X9602300203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter D. 2003. Armed Servants. Agency, Oversight and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Courtney J. 2019. “Providing for Global Security.” Implications of China’s Combat Troop Deployment to UN Peacekeeping. Global Governance 25 (4): 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504006.
   Google Scholar
• G1 Globo. 2007. Jobim: Atuação de tropas no Haiti pode servir para o Rio. http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/Brasil/0,,AA1625825-5598,00-JOBIM+ATUACAO+DE+TROPAS+NO+HAITI+PODE+SERVIR+PARA+O+RIO.html.
   Google Scholar
• González Guyer, Julián, and Nicole Jenne. 2021. “Controlling Blue Berets: The Consequences of Political Neglect in the Case of Uruguay’s Participation in Peacekeeping.” Armed Forces & Society 47 (3): 435–456. doi:10.1177/0095327X19877211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéhenno, Jean-Marie. 2007. Letters to the editor. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/letters-to-the-editor-the-inbox/2007/10/25/the-utility-of-peacekeeping-september-27th.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, Eduarda Passarelli, and Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert. 2019. “Brazil’s Evolving “Balancing Act” on the Use of Force in Multilateral Operations: From Robust Peacekeeping to “Responsibility While Protecting.” In Status and the Rise of Brazil: Global Ambitions, Humanitarian Engagement and International Challenges, edited by Paulo Esteves, Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert, and Benjamin de Carvalho, 153–173. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph. 2019. “Re-Importing the ‘Robust Turn’ in UN Peacekeeping: Internal Public Security Missions of Brazil’s Military.” International Peacekeeping 26 (2): 137–164. doi:10.1080/13533312.2018.1554442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph. 2020. “Learning to Fight in UN Peacekeeping.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 39–60. doi:10.1080/14702436.2019.1704177.
   Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph, and Nicole Jenne. 2022. “Whose Rules? Whose Power? The Global South and the Possibility to Shape International Peacekeeping Norms Through Leadership Appointments.” Review of International Studies 48 (4): 646–667. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph, Nicole Jenne, and Chiara Ruffa. 2022. “Operational Experiences, Military Role Conceptions, and Their Influence on Civil-Military Relations.” European Journal of International Security 7 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1017/eis.2021.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph, and Chiara Ruffa. 2022. “Knocking on the Barracks’ Door: How Role Conceptions Shape the Military’s Reactions to Political Demands.” European Journal of International Security 7 (1): 84–103. doi:10.1017/eis.2021.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelscher, Kristian, and Per M Norheim-Martinsen. 2014. “Urban Violence and the Militarisation of Security: Brazilian ‘Peacekeeping’ in Rio de Janeiro and Port-au-Prince.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 25 (5–6): 957–975. doi:10.1080/09592318.2014.945636.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Lise Morje, and Anjali Kaushlesh Dayal. 2018. “The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping.” International Organization 72 (Winter): 71–103. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000431.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Wendy. 1996. State and Soldier in Latin America. Redefining the Military’ s Role in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Wendy, and Timothy J Power. 2019. “Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash.” Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 68–82. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenne, Nicole. 2020. “Civilianizing the Armed Forces?” Peacekeeping, a Traditional Mission for the Military. Defence Studies 20 (2): 105–122. doi:10.1080/14702436.2020.1726741.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenellenbogen, Jonathan. 2019. SANDF deployment in Western Cape giving space for politicians and police. Defenceweb. https://www.defenceweb.co.za/featured/sandf-deployment-in-western-cape-giving-space-for-politicians-and-police/.
   Google Scholar
• Kenkel, Kai Michael. 2013. “Five Generations of Peace Operations: From the “Thin Blue Line” to “Painting a Country Blue”.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 56 (1): 122–143. doi:10.1590/S0034-73292013000100007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenkel, Kai Michael. 2021. “Stability Abroad, Instability at Home? Changing UN Peace Operations and Civil–Military Relations in Global South Troop Contributing Countries.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (2): 225–240. doi:10.1080/13523260.2021.1883276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnasamy, Kabilan. 2010. “A Case for India’s ‘Leadership’ in United Nations Peacekeeping.” International Studies 47 (2–4): 225–246. doi:10.1177/002088171104700410.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, Magnus. 2018. “Backdoor Peacekeeping.” Journal of Peace Research 55 (4): 508–523. doi:10.1177/0022343317747668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Zachariah. 2018. “Shifts in Global Power and UN Peacekeeping Performance: India’s Rise and its Impact on Civilian Protection in Africa.” African Affairs 117 (467): 171–194. doi:10.1093/afraf/ady009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, Adriana A. 2021. “A conexão Porto Príncipe-Brasília: A participação em missões de paz e o envolvimento na política doméstica.” In Os militares e a crise brasileira, edited by João Roberto Martins Filho, 245–256. São Paulo: Alameda.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, Rafa. 2022. Military multifunctionality and democracy: A dangerous coexistence. CIDOB notes internacionals. http://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/notes_internacionals/277/military_multifunctionality_and_democracy_a_dangerous_coexistence.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Frank D. 2004. Soldiers of the Pátria. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGreal, Chris. 2015. What’s the point of peacekeepers when they don’t keep the peace? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/17/un-united-nations-peacekeepers-rwanda-bosnia.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Kobi, and Eyal Ben-Ari. 2011. “Contemporary Peace Support Operations.” Armed Forces & Society 37 (4): 657–679. doi:10.1177/0095327X10390467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, C. Raja. 2013. India and International Peace Operations. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrief, Stephen. 2017. “Military Socialization, Disciplinary Culture, and Sexual Violence in UN Peacekeeping Operations.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (5): 715–730. doi:10.1177/0022343317716784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Anit. 2014. “Civil-Military Relations and Military Effectiveness in India.” In India’s Military Modernization. Challenges and Prospects, edited by Rajesh Basrur, Ajaya Kumar Das, and Manjeet S. Pardesi, 196–229. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Anit. 2022. “Towards Control and Effectiveness: The Ministry of Defence and Civil-Military Relations in India.” Journal of Strategic Studies, doi:10.1080/01402390.2022.2118115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Markus-Michael, and Andrea Steinke. 2021. “Community Policing’s Extended Military History: Brazilian Pacification from the Global Cold War to the Global War on Terror.” Policing and Society 31 (9): 1017–1035. doi:10.1080/10439463.2020.1772256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Edward. 2010. “Peacebuilding as Security in ‘Failing’ and Conflict-Prone States.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4 (3): 305–322. doi:10.1080/17502977.2010.498935.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, Sánchez, and W. Alejandro. 2012. “Brazil’s Grand Design for Combining Global South Solidarity and National Interests: A Discussion of Peacekeeping Operations in Haiti and Timor.” Globalizations 9 (1): 161–178. doi:10.1080/14747731.2012.627719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norden, Deborah L. 1995. “Keeping the Peace, Outside and In: Argentina’s UN Missions.” International Peacekeeping 2 (3): 330–349. doi:10.1080/13533319508413565.
   Google Scholar
• Oksamytna, Kseniya, Vincenzo Bove, and Magnus Lundgren. 2021. “Leadership Selection in United Nations Peacekeeping.” International Studies Quarterly 65 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1093/isq/sqaa023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddon Rhoads, Emily. 2016. Taking Sides in Peacekeeping: Impartiality and the Future of the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pant, Harsh V., and Kartik Bommakanti. 2019. “India’s National Security: Challenges and Dilemmas.” International Affairs 95 (4): 835–857. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, Timothy J.A. 2022. “Democratization and Troop Contributions to United Nations Peacekeeping.” Armed Forces & Society 48 (2): 274–301. doi:10.1177/0095327X20968197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passos, Anaís Medeiros, and Rafael A. Duarte Villa. 2022. “Engagement of Military Peacekeepers in Brazilian Politics (2011–2021).” Armed Forces & Society, doi:10.1177/0095327X221087254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. “Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization 56 (3): 515–549. doi:10.1162/002081802760199872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingeot, Lou. 2018. “United Nations Peace Operations as International Practices: Revisiting the UN Mission’s Armed Raids Against Gangs in Haiti.” European Journal of International Security 3 (3): 364–381. doi:10.1017/eis.2018.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podder, Sukanya, and Kaushik Roy. 2022. “Use of Force to Protect Civilians in United Nations Peacekeeping: Military Culture, Organisational Learning and Troop Reticence.” Civil Wars, doi:10.1080/13698249.2022.2119506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, Rajesh. 2004. “Innovations in Counterinsurgency: The Indian Army’s Rashtriya Rifles.” Contemporary South Asia 13 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1080/0958493042000209852.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, Rajesh. 2021. Take Indian Army out of counterinsurgency. It has to tackle leaner, modern PLA. The Print. https://theprint.in/opinion/take-indian-army-out-of-counterinsurgency/674097/.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, Iskander. 2009. “Keeping the Dragon at Bay: India’s Counter-Containment of China in Asia.” Asian Security 5 (2): 114–143. doi:10.1080/14799850902885114.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffa, Chiara. 2017. “Military Cultures and Force Employment in Peace Operations.” Security Studies 26 (3): 391–422. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1306393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffa, Chiara, and Sebastiaan Rietjens. 2023. “Meaning Making in Peacekeeping Missions: Mandate Interpretation and Multinational Collaboration in the UN Mission in Mali.” European Journal of International Relations, doi:10.1177/13540661221104757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, Victória M. S., and Maíra Siman. 2022. “Civil-military Relations as a ‘Coordination Problem’? Doctrine Development and the Multiple ‘Missions’ of the Brazilian Armed Forces.” Critical Military Studies, doi:10.1080/23337486.2022.2047502.
   Google Scholar
• Savell, Stephanie. 2014. The Brazilian Military, Public Security, and Rio de Janeiro’ s “Pacification”. Anthropoliteia. http://anthropoliteia.net/2014/07/07/the-brazilian-military-public-security-and-rio-de-janeiros-pacification/.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, Rebecca L. 2009. The Military and Domestic Politics: A Concordance Theory of Civil–Military Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sion, Liora. 2006. “Too Sweet and Innocent for War?” Armed Forces & Society 32 (3): 454–474. doi:10.1177/0095327X05281453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaar, Elin, and Camila Gianella Malca. 2014. Latin American Civil-Military Relations in a Historical Perspective: A Literature Review. CMI Working Paper 6.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul. 2008. “Explaining Civil-Military Relations in Complex Political Environments: India and Pakistan in Comparative Perspective.” Security Studies 17 (2): 322–362. doi:10.1080/09636410802099022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred. 1973. “The New Professionalism of Internal Warfare and Military Role Expansion.” In Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future, edited by Alfred Stepan, 41–65. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, Thierry. 2011. “A Critique of Robust Peacekeeping in Contemporary Peace Operations.” International Peacekeeping 18 (2): 152–167. doi:10.1080/13533312.2011.546089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tull, Denis M. 2018. “The Limits and Unintended Consequences of UN Peace Enforcement: The Force Intervention Brigade in the DR Congo.” International Peacekeeping 25 (2): 167–190. doi:10.1080/13533312.2017.1360139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2000. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. New York: General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2023. Troop and police contributors. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors.
   Google Scholar
• Vennesson, Pascal, Fabian Breuer, Chiara de Franco, and Ursula C. Schroeder. 2009. “Is There a European Way of War?” Armed Forces & Society 35 (4): 628–645. doi:10.1177/0095327X08317994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villas Bôas, Eduardo Dias da Costa. 2018. Árdua tarefa. Veja. https://veja.abril.com.br/revista-veja/ardua-tarefa/.
   Google Scholar
• Vitelli, Marina Gisela. 2020. “The Impossibility of a Defence Policy in the Americas? Comparing Hemispheric and South American Security Concepts and Military Roles.” Contexto Internacional 42 (1): 81–102. doi:10.1590/s0102-8529.2019420100004.
   Google Scholar
• Vitelli, Marina Gisela. 2022. “Back to Basics: Assessing Military Involvement in Politics in Contemporary Brazil.” Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies 10 (2): 10–28. doi:10.25160/bjbs/10.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Weinlich, Silke. 2012. “(Re)Generating Peacekeeping Authority: The Brahimi Process.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (3): 257–277. doi:10.1080/17502977.2012.655625.
   Google Scholar
• Whitestone, Yuko Kurashina, and David R Segal. 2007. “New Missions or Old Missions for New Actors.” International Review of Sociology 17 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1080/03906700601129517.
   Google Scholar
• Wilén, Nina, Gérard Birantamije, and David Ambrosetti. 2018. “The Burundian Army’s Trajectory to Professionalization and Depoliticization, and Back Again.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 12 (1): 120–135. doi:10.1080/17531055.2017.1418173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Steven I. 2018. “Civil-Military Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of India’s National Security, edited by Sumit Ganguly, Manjeet Pardesi, and Nicolas Blarel, 165–183. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worboys, Katherine J. 2007. “The Traumatic Journey from Dictatorship to Democracy.” Armed Forces & Society 33 (2): 149–168. doi:10.1177/0095327X05283843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar