Exclusionary Inclusion: The Unforeseen Consequences of Norm Promotion in Myanmar’s Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement Process

References

• Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58: 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World1” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alluri, Rina, Stefan Baechtold, Rachel Gasser, Julia Palmiano, and Sabina Stein. 2014. Working in and on Myanmar: Reflections on a ‘Light Footprint’ Approach. Bern: swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Anderlini, Sanam. 2007. Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why It Matters. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Miriam. 2010. “Transnational Feminism and Norm Diffusion in Peace Processes: The Cases of Burundi and Northern Ireland.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970903086727.
   Google Scholar
• Ardeth Maung, Thawnghmung, and Maung Aung Myoe. 2007. “Myanmar in 2006: Another Year of Housekeeping?” Asian Survey 47 (1): 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2007.47.1.194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung Naing Oo. 2018. Lessons Learned from Myanmar’s Peace Process. Siem Reap: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Baechtold, Stefan. 2015. “The Rise of an Anti-Politics Machinery: Peace, Civil Society and the Focus on Results in Myanmar.” Third World Quarterly 36 (10): 1968–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1063406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Christine, and Catherine O'Rourke. 2007. “The People's Peace? Peace Agreements, Civil Society, and Participatory Democracy.” International Political Science Review 28 (3): 293–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107077094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Christine, and Jan Pospisil. 2017. “Navigating Inclusion in Transitions from Conflict: The Formalised Political Unsettlement.” Journal of International Development 29 (5): 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Jacques, Alexandre Pelletier, and Ardeth Maung Thawnghmung. 2022. Winning by Process: The State and Neutralization of Ethnic Minorities in Myanmar. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaydes, Lisa, and Jennifer De Maio. 2010. “Spoiling the Peace? Peace Process Exclusivity and Political Violence in North-Central Africa.” Civil Wars 12:3–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2010.484896.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, Linnea, Elisabeth Olivius, and Jenny. Hedström. 2021. “Care and Silence in Women’s Everyday Peacebuilding in Myanmar.” Conflict, Security & Development 21 (3): 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.1933031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buranajaroenkij, Duanghathai. 2020. “Challenges to Women's Inclusion in Peace Processes in Thailand and Myanmar.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (3): 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2019.1698973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, M. P. 2003. Making Enemies: War and Statebuilding in Burma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., D. Chandler, and M. Shabaratnam. 2011. A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, Magda Lorena, and Elisabeth Olivius. 2021. “Building Peace in the Shadow of War: Women-to-Women Diplomacy as Alternative Peacebuilding Practice in Myanmar.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 15 (3): 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1917254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charney, Michael W. 2009. A History of Modern Burma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A., and J. W. Davis. 2000. “Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 2 (1): 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00184.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Laura. 2014. EU Foreign Policy, Transitional Justice and Mediation: Principle, Policy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, Timothy, and Erin McCandless. 2017. “International Peace Building and the Emerging Inclusivity Norm.” Third World Quarterly 38 (2): 291–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1191344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael. 2005. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draude, Anke. 2017. “The Agency of the Governed in Transfer and Diffusion Studies.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (5): 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2018.1470476.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, Mervyn. 1998. “A Turn not Taken: Ethics in IR at the Millenium.” Review of International Studies 24 (5): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001296.
   Google Scholar
• Goetschel, Laurent, and Tobias Hagmann. 2009. “Civilian Peacebuilding: Peace by Bureaucratic Means?, Conflict, Security & Development 9 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800802704911.
   Google Scholar
• Grizelj, I. 2019. “Engaging the Next Generation: A Field Perspective of Youth Inclusion in Myanmar’s Peace Negotiations.” International Negotiation 24 (1): 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-24011148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayner, Priscilla. 2018. The Peacemaker's Paradox: Pursuing Justice in the Shadow of Conflict. Routledge: Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmüller, Sara. 2019. “Beyond Buzzwords: Civil Society Inclusion in Mediation.” In Conflict Intervention and Transformation: Theory and Practice, edited by H.-W. Jeong, 47–63. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmüller, Sara. 2023. “Knowledge Production on Mediation: Practice-Oriented, but not Practice-Relevant?” International Affairs 99 (5): 1847–1866. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmüller, Sara, Julia Palmiano Federer, and Jamie Pring. 2017. Are Mediators Norm Entrepreneurs? Bern: swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmüller, Sara, Julia Palmiano Federer, and Matthias Zeller. 2015. The Role of Norms in International Peace Mediation. Bern: swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Hirblinger, Andreas, and Dana Landau. 2020. “Daring to Differ? Strategies of Inclusion in Peacemaking.” Security Dialogue 51 (4): 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619893227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, Paul. 2015. All-Inclusiveness in an Ethnic Context. EBO Background Paper. Brussels: Euro Burma Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kolås, Åshild, ed. 2019. Women, Peace and Security in Myanmar: Between Feminism and Ethnopolitics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kyaw Yin Hlaing. 2012. “Understanding Recent Political Changes in Myanmar.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 34 (2): 197–216. Project MUSE muse.jhu.edu/article/483672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehti, Marko. 2019. The Era of Private Peacemakers: A New Dialogic Approach to Mediation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, Kristoffer, Roger Mac Ginty and Oliver P. Richmond. 2009. “Introduction: Beyond Northern Epistemologies of Peace: Peacebuilding Reconstructed?” International Peacekeeping 16 (5): 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310903303230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoletti, Paul. 2016. Knowledge Inputs, Needs and Gaps for Myanmar's Political Dialogue: A Mapping Exercise Conducted for the United States Institute of Peace. Yangon: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Min Zaw Oo. 2014. Understanding Myanmar's Peace Process: Ceasefire Agreements. Bern: Swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenbeck, Allison and Julia Palmiano Federer. 2016. Women's Inclusion in Myanmar's Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement. Washington, DC: Institute for Inclusive Security.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Desirée. 2012. “Anchoring the Peace: Civil Society Actors in Peace Accords and Durable Peace.” International Interactions 38:243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2012.659139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Desirée, and Isak Svensson. 2023. “Pushing the Doors Open: Nonviolent Action and Inclusion in Peace Negotiations.” Journal of Peace Research 60 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221141468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. 2014. “Civil Society and Peace Negotiations: Beyond the Inclusion-Exclusion Dichotomy.” Negotiation Journal 30 (1): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania, and William I. Zartman. 2019. “Inclusive Peace Negotiations – from a Neglected Topic to New Hype.” International Negotiation 24 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-24011186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmiano Federer, Julia. 2016. On Gender: The Role of Norms in International Peace Mediation. Bern: swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Palmiano Federer, Julia. 2021. “Cowboys or Mavericks? The Normative Agency of NGO Mediators.” In Rethinking Peace Mediation, edited by Catherine Turner and Martin Wählisch, 71–92. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmiano Federer, Julia. 2024. NGOS Mediating Peace: Promoting Inclusion in Myanmar’s Nationwide Ceasefire Negotiations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Papagianni, Katia. 2018. “Human Rights Issues and Dilemmas in Contemporary Peace Mediation.” In Human Rights and Conflict Resolution: Bridging the Theoretical and Practical Divide, edited by C. Fuentes Julio and P. Drummond, 61–77. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. 2010. “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36 (2): 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Richard. 1998. “International Norms and the Mines Taboo: Pulls toward Compliance.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 5 (3): 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1998.9673152.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, Jamie. 2023. “The Other Side of Resistance: Challenges to Inclusivity Within Civil Society and the Limits of International Peace Mediation.” Cooperation and Conflict 58 (2): 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367221137183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, J., and J. Palmiano Federer. 2020. “The Normative Agency of Regional Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations in International Peace Mediation” Swiss Political Science Review 26 (4): 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhong, Lian. 2012. The Dynamics of Sixty Years of Ethnic Armed Conflict in Burma. Yangon: Burma Centre for Ethnic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Selth, A. 2002. Burma's Armed Forces: Power Without Glory. Salt Lake City: Signature Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Robert H. 1982. “Perceptions of Ethnicity in the Politics of Burma.” Asian Journal of Social Science 10 (1): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853182X00029.
   Google Scholar
• Thant Myint-U. 2011. Where China Meets India: Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Catherine, and Martin Waelisch, eds. 2021. Rethinking Peace Mediation: Challenges of Contemporary Peacemaking Practice. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2012. UN Guidance for Effective Mediation. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wanis St-John, Anthony, and Darren Kew. 2008. “Civil Society and Peace Negotiations: Confronting Exclusion.” International Negotiation 13:11–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/138234008X297896.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2004. “Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104042934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonas, and Lisbeth Zimmermann. 2016. Between Banyans and Battle Scenes: Liberal Norms, Contestation, and the Limits of Critique. Review of International Studies 42 (3): 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahar, Marie-Joelle. 2010. “SRSG Mediation in Civil Wars: Revisiting the “Spoiler” Debate.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16 (2): 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01602006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahar, M. J., and E. McCandless. 2020. “Sustaining Peace One Day at a Time: Inclusion, Transition Crises, and the Resilience of Social Contracts.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 14 (1): 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1673130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanker, Franziska. 2014. “Legitimate Representation: Civil Society Actors in Peace Negotiations Revisited.” International Negotiation 19:62–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341270.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, Lisbeth, Nicole Deitelhoff and Max Lesch. 2017. “Unlocking the Agency of The Governed: Contestation and Norm Dynamics.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (5): 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2017.1396912.
   Google Scholar