The real gaze in Australian cinema

Bibliography

• Baudry, Jean-Louis. 1986. “Ideological Effects and the Basic Cinematic Apparatus.” In Movies and Methods, Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 532–542. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Peter. 1985. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Ben. 2014. “Colonial Mythology in Twenty-First Century Australian Film.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 8 (1): 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Felicity. 2008. “Historical Fiction and Allegorical Truth in The Proposition.” Cultural Studies Review 14 (1): 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. Austin. 2019. “Jennifer Kent’s The Nightingale Doesn’t Feel Good, But That’s Not the Point.” Vanity Fair, August 2. Accessed December 07: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/08/the-nightingale-movie-review.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Felicity, and Therese Davis. 2004. Australian Cinema After Mabo. Cambridge; Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dermody, S., and E. Jacka. 1987. The Screening of Australia: Anatomy of a Film Industry, vol.1. Sydney: Currency Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, John. 1992. Visible Fictions: Cinema: Television: Video. Revised Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Ross. 1992. South of the West: Postcolonialism and the Narrative Construction of Australia. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Ross. 1994. “Formative Landscapes.” In Australian Cinema, edited by Scott Murray, 45–60. NSW: Allen & Unwin/AFC.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, Nicholas. 2017. “National Nightmare: Mob Mentality and Colonial Failure in Wake in Fright.” Screen Education 85: 116–121.
   Google Scholar
• Gook, Ben. 2017. “Australian Postcolonial Trauma and Silences in Samson and Delilah.” In Scars and Wounds: Film and Legacies of Trauma, edited by Nick Hodgin, and Amit Thakkar, 169–194. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2008 [1973]. “Encoding, Decoding.” In Cultural Studies: An Anthology, edited by M. Rya. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Stephen. 1999. “Cinema and Psychoanalysis: Parallel Histories.” In Endless Night: Cinema and Psychoanalysis, Parallel Histories, edited by Janet Bergstrom, 25–56. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higson, Andrew. 2000. “The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema.” In Cinema and Nation, edited by Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie, 65–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, Ambler. 2009. “Lost and Found: Looking Back at Wake in Fright.” Metro Magazine 163: 126–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. Ann. 2008. “Traumatic Contact Zones and Embodied Translators With Reference to Select Australian Texts.” In Trauma and Cinema: Cross-Cultural Explorations, edited by E. Ann Kaplan and Ban Wang, 45–63. Aberdeen and Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. Ann, and Ban Wang, eds. 2008. “Introduction.” In Trauma and Cinema: Cross-Cultural Explorations, 1–22. Aberdeen and Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Tina. 2010. Wake in Fright. Sydney: Currency Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, Jacques. 1976. “Conférences et entretiens dans des universitiés nord-américans [Lectures and Interviews at North American Universities].” Scilicet 6: 75–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, Jacques. 2002 [1977]. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the “I” as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Practice.” In Jacques Lacan Écrits: A Selection, translated by Alan Sheridan, 3–9. London and New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Limbrick, Peter. 2007. “The Australian Western, or a Settler Colonial Cinema par Excellence.” Cinema Journal 46 (4 (Summer)): 68–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Adrian. 2010. “Ozploitation Compared to What? A Challenge to Contemporary Australian Film Studies.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 4 (1): 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, Maitland, and Maurice Bursztynski. 2016. “Episode 271: Wake in Fright.” The Projection Booth (podcast), uploaded 5/17/2016. http://www.projectionboothpodcast.com/2016/05/episode-271-wake-in-fright.html.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Neil. 2010. “Inside Wake In Fright.” Quadrant 54 (1-2 (Jan-Feb)): 110–112.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, Brian. 1987. Australian Cinema 1970-1985. London: Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, Todd. 2003. “Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and Its Vicissitudes.” Cinema Journal 42 (3 (Spring)): 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, Todd. 2007. The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, Todd. 2015. Psychoanalytic Film Theory and The Rules of the Game. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Christian. 1982. The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Gabrielle. 2017. “Dreaming of the Devil: Revisiting Ted Kotcheff’s Wake in Fright.” Metro Magazine 193: 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, Tom. 2002. “A National Cinema.” In The Film Cultures Reader, edited by Graeme Turner, 139–164. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perrottet, Tony. 2019. “The Homecoming.” Smithsonian 50 (5 (Sept. 1)): 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Stephen. 1996. “Psychoanalytic Film Theory and the Problem of the Missing Spectator.” In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, edited by David Bordwell, and Noël Carroll, 71–86. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, Jonathan. 2011. “Gothic Definitions: The New Australian “Cinema of Horrors”.” Antipodes 25 (1): 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rodowick, D. N. 2015. The Difficulty of Difference: Psychoanalysis, Sexual Difference & Film Theory. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Mark David. 2010. “Towards an Understanding of Australian Genre Cinema and Entertainment: Beyond the Limitations of ‘Ozploitation’ Discourse.” Continuum 24 (6): 843–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Mark David, and Ben Goldsmith. 2017a. “Australian Screen in the 2000s: An Introduction.” In Australian Screen in the 2000s, edited by Mark David Ryan, and Ben Goldsmith, 1–21. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Mark David, and Ben Goldsmith. 2017b. “Returning to Australian Horror Film and Ozploitation Cinema Debate.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 11 (1): 2–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemienowicz, Rochelle. 1999. “Globalisation and Home Values in New Australian Cinema.” Journal of Australian Studies 23 (63): 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, Jane. 2019. “Atopian Landscapes: Gothic Tropes in Australian Cinema.” In A Companion to Australian Cinema, edited by Felicity Collins, Jane Landman, and Susan Bye, 336–354. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Studlar, Gaylyn. 1984. “Masochism and the Perverse Pleasures of the Cinematic Apparatus.” Quarterly Review of Film Studies 9 (4): 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themi, Tim. 2019. “A Psychoanalytic Translation of the Australian Film The Proposition.” Parce que ce n'est pas ça [Because That's Not It]: Journal of the Lacanian Field 1: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Graeme. 1994/5. “Whatever Happened to National Identity? Film and the Nation in the 1990s.” Metro Magazine 100 (Summer): 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• University of Melbourne. 2003. Media Release, Wednesday 19 February 2003: https://web.archive.org/web/20051024214356/http://uninews.unimelb.edu.au/articleid_352.html.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden. 1996. “The Modernist Event.” In The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television and the Modern Event, edited by Vivian Sobchak, 17–38. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlam Institute. 2020. Western Sydney University. ‘The Arts’. Accessed December 07 2020: https://www.whitlam.org/whitlam-legacy-the-arts.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, Adi (Adolf). 2007. Australian Film: Cultures, Identities, Texts. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, Slavoj. 1993. “Enjoy Your Nation as Yourself!.” In Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology, 200–238. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar