Training and educating interpreter and translator trainers as practitioners-researchers-teachers

References

• Andres, D., and M. Behr, eds. 2015. To Know How to Suggest … Approaches to Teaching Conference Interpreting. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, M. 2015. “How to Back the Students – Quality, Assessment and Feedback.” In To Know How to Suggest … Approaches to Teaching Conference Interpreting, edited by D. Andres and M. Behr, 201–217. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, E. 2011. “Translation And/or Translator Skills as Organising Principles for Curriculum Development Practice.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 16: 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, E. 2015. “Scaffolding Translation Skills through Situated Training Approaches: Progressive and Reflective Methods.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9 (3): 306–322. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2015.1103107.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. Y. 2006. “Metacognitive Evaluation Method in Consecutive Interpretation for Novice Learners.” Meta 51 (2): 273–283. doi:10.7202/013256ar.
   Google Scholar
• Delisle, J. 1980. L’Analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction. Ottawa: Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Drugan, J. 2013. Quality in Professional Translation. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, Á. 2008. “Énième plaidoyer pour l’innovation dans les cours pratiques de traduction. Préalables à l’innovation?” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction 21 (1): 65–98. doi:10.7202/029687ar.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, Á. 2017. “Le discours sur la formation des traducteurs.” In Pour une interdisciplinarité réciproque, recherches actuelles en traductologie, edited by M.-A. Belle and A. Echeverri, 155–178. Arras Canada: Artois Presse Université.
   Google Scholar
• EMT Expert Group. 2013. “The EMT Translator Trainer Profile. Competences of the Trainer in Translation.” Accessed 15 April 2019. https://www.scribd.com/document/246979198/Translator-Trainer-Profile-EMT
   Google Scholar
• Gabr, M. 2007. “A TQM Approach to Translator Training. Balancing Stakeholders’ Needs and Responsibilities.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1: 65–77. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798750.
   Google Scholar
• Gambier, Y. 2012. “Teaching translation/Training Translators.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, 3, edited by Y. Gambier and L. van Doorslaer, 163–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 1993. “The Process-Oriented Approach in Translation Training.” In Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2, edited by C. Dollerup and A. Lindegaard, 107–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 1995. “Interpretation Research: A New Impetus?” Hermes, Journal of Linguistics 14: 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 2009. “Research for Training, Research for Society in Translation Studies.” In Translation Research Projects, edited by A. Pym and A. Perekrestenko, 35–40. Vol. 2. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.
   Google Scholar
• González-Davies, M. 2004. Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• González-Davies, M., and V. Enríquez Raído. 2016. “Situated Learning in Translator and Interpreter Training: Bridging Research and Good Practice.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2016.1154339.
   Google Scholar
• Gouadec, D. 2002. Profession: Traducteur. Paris: La Maison du Dictionnaire.
   Google Scholar
• Gouadec, D. 2007. Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, I. 2012. Interpreter Behaviour: A Psychological Approach. Budapest: Hang Nyelviskola Bt.
   Google Scholar
• Hubscher-Davidson, S. 2008. “A Reflection on Action Research Processes in Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2008.10798767.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A., ed. 1999. Enseñar a traducir. Metodología en la formación de traductores e intérpretes. Madrid: Edelsa.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. 2007. “Competence-based Curriculum Design for Training Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1 (2): 163–195. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798757.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. 2015. “The Acquisition of Translation Competence. Competences, Tasks, and Assessment in Translator Training.” Meta 60 (2): 256–280. doi:10.7202/1032857ar.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, J. 2006. “Curriculum Renewal in Translator Training: Vocational Challenges in Academic Environments with Reference to Needs and Situation Analysis and Skills Transferability from the Contemporary Experience of Polish Translator Training Culture.” PhD diss., Dublin City University.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, J. 2008. “The Academic and the Vocational in Translator Education.” In Translator and Interpreter Training, edited by J. Kearns, 185–214. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. 2005. A Handbook for Translator Trainers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. 2008. “Training the Trainers: Towards a Description of Translator Trainer Competence and Training Needs Analysis.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Redaction 21 (1): 99–125. doi:10.7202/029688ar.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 1995. Pathways to Translation: Pedagogy and Process. Kent: Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 2000. A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education: Empowerment from Theory to Practice. Manchester: St Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 2005. “Project-based Learning: A Case for Situated Translation.” Meta 50 (4): 1098–1111. doi:10.7202/012063ar.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 2012. “Growing A Project-based Translation Pedagogy: A Fractal Perspective.” Meta 57 (1): 82–95. doi:10.7202/1012742ar.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 2016a. “Authentic Project Work and Pedagogical Epistemologies: A Question of Competing or Complementary Worldviews?.” In Towards Authentic Experiential Learning in Translator Education, edited by D. Kiraly, 53–66. Göttingen: V&R unipress/Mainz University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D., ed. 2016b. Towards Authentic Experiential Learning in Translator Education. Göttingen: V&R unipress/Mainz University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhenz, E., J. Wilkinson, M. Gearon, S. Fernandes, and L. Ingvarson. 2007. “The Review of Teacher Education for Languages Teachers: Final Report.” Accessed 13 June 2019. http://research.acer.edu.au/teacher_education/9
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, P. P. 2005. “Technologies, Discourse Analysis, and the Spoken Word: The MRC Approach, an Empirical Approach to Interpreter Performance Evaluation and Pedagogy.” Meta 50 (4). doi:10.7202/019848ar.
   Google Scholar
• Mâţă, L., D. Cmeciu, and R. Ghiaţău. 2013. “A Reference Framework of Pedagogical Competences of Language Teachers in the Initial Training Programmes.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 93: 648–653. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.255.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, G. 2005. “Process-oriented Translator Training and the Challenge for E-learning.” Meta 50 (2): 626–633. doi:10.7202/011006ar.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelson, H. 2013. “Universities and Interpreter Certification.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research 5 (1): 66–78. doi:10.12807/issn.1836-9324.
   Google Scholar
• Neves, J. 2005. “We Do Not Teach Translation, We Train Translators: An Interview with Yves Gambier.” Translating Today 2: 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, C. 1991. Text Analysis in Translation, Translated by C. Nord and P. Sparrow. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, J., and C. Winch. 2015. “What Training Do Teachers Need? Why Theory Is Necessary to Good Teaching.” IMPACT Philosophical Perspectives on Education Policy 22. Accessed 24 March 2019. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imp.2015.2015.issue-22/issuetoc
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. 2010. “Digital Pen Technology and Consecutive Interpreting: Another Dimension in Note-Taking Training and Assessment.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15: 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. 2011. “Evaluations of Translations in the Training of Professional Translators: At the Crossroads between Theoretical, Professional and Pedagogical Practices.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (2): 293–308. doi:10.1080/13556509.2011.10798822.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. 2016. Training 21st Century Translators and Interpreters: At the Crossroads of Practice, Research and Pedagogy. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. 2017. “Former les interprètes et les traducteurs de demain: Développer les savoirs, savoir-faire et savoir-être.” In Education Is a Whole-Person Process, edited by M. Behr and S. Seubert, 45–63. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2004. Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2010. “The Role of Research in Interpreter Education.” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 2: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2016. Introducing Interpreting Studies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A. 2003. "Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age. In Defence of a Minimalist Approach." Meta 48 (4): 481-497
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A., and E. Torres-Simón. 2016a. “Designing a Course in Translation Studies to Respond to Students’ Questions.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10 (2): 183–203. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2016.1198179.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A., and E. Torres-Simón. 2016b. “The Professional Backgrounds of Translation Scholars. Report on a Survey.” Target 28 (1): 110–131. doi:10.1075/target.28.1.05tor.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A., and E. Torres-Simón. 2017. “European Masters in Translation: A Comparative Study.” Accessed 10 May 2018. http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/training/2016_EMT_masters.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Risku, H. 2016. “Situated Learning in Translation Research Training: Academic Research as a Reflection of Practice.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10 (1): 12–28. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2016.1154340.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, D. 2004. Fundamental Aspects of Interpreter Education: Curriculum and Assessment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Setton, R. 2010. “From Practice to Theory and Back in Interpreting: The Pivotal Role of Training.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Setton, R., and A. Dawrant. 2016. Conference Interpreting, a Trainer’s Guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, K. 2010. “What Interpreting Teachers Can Learn from Students: A Case Study.” Translation & Interpreting 2 (1): 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Townsley, B. 2011. “The Training of Trainers for Legal Interpreting and Translation.” In Building Mutual Trust: A Framework Project for Implementing EU Common Standards in Legal Interpreting and Translating, edited by B. Townsley, E. Hertog, C. Giambruno, A. Corsellis, T. Ghiviriga, Y. Vanden Bosch, B. Martinsen, et al., 308–318. London: Middlesex University. Accessed 12 January 2019 https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/12234/1/BMT%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vienne, J. 1994. “Pour une pédagogie de la traduction en situation.” In Translation Studies – An Interdiscipline, edited by M. Snell-Hornby, F. Pöchhacker, and K. Kaindl, 421–431. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Way, C. 2008. “Systematic Assessment of Translator Competence: In Search of Achilles’ Heel.” In Translator and Interpreter Training, edited by J. Kearns, 88–103. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Winteringham, S. 2010. “The Usefulness of ICTs in Interpreting Practice.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15: 87–99.
   Google Scholar