Public service interpreting and translation training: a path towards digital adaptation to machine translation and post-editing

References

• Abril, M. I. 2006. “La interpretación en los servicios públicos: caracterización como género, contextualización y modelos de formación. Hacia unas bases para el diseño curricular.” PhD diss., University of Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Angelelli, C. 2006. “Designing Curriculum for Healthcare Interpreter Education: A Principles Approach.” In New Approaches to Interpreter Education, edited by C. Roy, 23–46. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cedillo Corrochano, C. 2021. “La Pluralidad Denominativa de la Traducción E Interpretación En Los Servicios Públicos a Través de Twitter Y YouTube.” Lebende Sprachen 66 (1): 180–192. doi:10.1515/les-2021-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Chodkiewicz, M. 2012. “The EMT Framework of Reference for Competences Applied to Translation: Perceptions by Professional and Student Translators.” JosTrans 17: 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cid Leal, P., M. C. Espín-García, and M. Presas. 2019. “Traducción automática y posedición: Perfiles y competencias en los programas de formación de traductores.” MonTI 11 (11): 187–214. doi:10.6035/MonTI.2019.11.7.
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, M., O. Crasborn, and J. Napier. 2021. “Interpreting International Sign: Mapping the Interpreter’s Profile.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 15 (2): 205–224. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2020.1868172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Décieux, J., A. Mergener, K. Neufang, and P. Sischka. 2015. “Implementation of the Forced Answering Option within Online Surveys: Do Higher Item Response Rates Come at the Expense of Participation and Answer Quality?” Psihologija 48 (4): 311–326. doi:10.2298/PSI1504311D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Pozo, M. 2009. “Una propuesta formativa en interpretación en los servicios públicos en el marco del EEES.” Redit 3: 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, S., and J. Moorkens. 2013. “Investigating the Experience of Translation Technology Labs: Pedagogical Implications.” JosTrans 19: 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, S., and D. Kenny. 2014. “The Design and Evaluation of a Statistical Machine Translation Syllabus for Translation Students.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (2): 295–315. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2014.937571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edley, N., and L. Litoselitti. 2018. “Critical Perspectives on Using Interviews and Focus Groups.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, edited by L. Litoselitti, 195–225. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• European Master’s in Translation Network. 2009. Competences for professional translators, experts in multilingual and multimedia communication. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/emt_competences_translators_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Master’s in Translation Network. 2017. European Master’s in Translation Competence Framework 2017. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/emt_competence_fwk_2017_en_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• González Pastor, D., and C. Rico. 2021. “POSEDITrad: La Traducción Automática y la Posedición Para la Formación de Traductores e Intérpretes.” Revista Digital de Investigación En Docencia Universitaria 15 (1): e1213. doi:10.19083/ridu.2021.1213.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Davies, M. 2004. Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom: Activities, Tasks and Projects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/btl.54.
   Google Scholar
• Guerberof, A., and J. Moorkens. 2019. “Machine Translation and Post-Editing Training as Part of a Master’s Programme.” JosTrans 31: 217–238.
   Google Scholar
• Guinovart Cid, C., and C. Colominas Ventura. 2021. “The MT Post- Editing Skill Set: Course Description and Educators’ Thoughts.” In Translation Revision and Post-Editing. Industry Practices and Cognitive Processes, edited by M. Koponen, B. Mossop, I. S. Robert, and G. Scocchera, 226–246. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003096962-17.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta Barros, E. 2011. “Colaborative Learning in the Translation Classroom: Preliminary Survey Results.” JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 16: 42–60. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://jostrans.org/issue16/art_barros.php
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. 2007. “Competence-Based Curriculum Design for Training Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1 (2): 163–195. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konttinen, C., L. Salmi, and M. Koponen. 2021. “Revision and Post-Editing Competences in Translator Educator.” In Translation Revision and Post-Editing. Industry Practices and Cognitive Processes, edited by M. Koponen, B. Mossop, I. S. Robert, and G. Scocchera, 187–202. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003096962-15.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen, M. 2015. “How to Teach Machine Translation Post-Editing? Experiences from a Post-Editing Course.” In Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice (WPTP4), edited by S. O’Brien and M. Simard, 2–15. Washington, DC: Association for Machine Translation in the Americas. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://amtaweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/MTSummitXV_WPTP4Proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K., and M. Ruokonen. 2017. “Love Letters or Hate Mail? Translators Technology Acceptance in the Light of Their Emotional Narratives.” In Human Issues in Translation Technology, edited by D. Kenny, 8–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by J. D. Wright and P. V. Mardsden, 263–313. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. 2016. “Situated LSP Translation from a Cognitive Translational Perspective.” Lebende Sprachen 61 (2): 297–332. doi:10.1515/les-2016-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. 2018. “Help or Hinder? the Impact of Technology on the Role of Interpreters.” FITISPos International Journal 5 (1): 13–32. doi:10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2018.5.1.162.
   Google Scholar
• Moorkens, J. 2018. “What to Expect from Neural Machine Translation: A Practical in-class Translation Evaluation Exercise.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12 (4): 375–387. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2018.1501639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 2012. “Usability 101: Introduction to Usability.” Nielsen Norman Group. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez, J., and A. Bolaños Medina. 2017. “Predictors of problem-solving in Translation: Implications for Translator Training.” The Interpreter and the Translator Trainer 12 (3): 1–17. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359762.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S. 2002. “Teaching Post-Editing: A Proposal for Course Content”. In Proceedings of the 6th EAMT Workshop on Teaching Machine Translation, 99–106. Allschwil, Switzerland: European Association for Machine Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza Lara, C. 2019. “SWOT Analysis of the Inclusion of Machine Translation and Post-Editing in the Master’s Degrees Offered in the EMT Network.” JosTrans 31: 260–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, C. 2017. “La formación de traductores en traducción automática.” Tradumátic 15: 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rico Pérez, C. 2021. Fundamentos teórico-prácticos para el ejercicio de la traducción. Granada: Comares.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Castro, M. 2018. “An Integrated Curricular Design for Computer-Assisted Translation Tools: Developing Technical Expertise.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12 (4): 355–374. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2018.1502007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Ramos, M. M. 2020. Documentación Digital Y Léxico En la Traducción E Interpretación En Los Servicios Públicos (TISP): Fundamentos Teóricos Y Prácticos. Berlin: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/b16632.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Ramos, M. M., and C. Rico Pérez. 2020a. Traducción automática. Conceptos clave, procesos de evaluación y técnicas de posedición. Granada: Comares.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Ramos, M. M., and C. Rico Pérez. 2020b. CRISIS-MT: traducción y tecnología en la comunicación multilingüe para las ONG en situaciones de emergencia. University of Alcalá. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://ebuah.uah.es/dspace/handle/10017/42946
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Gijón, P. 2016. “La posedición: Hacia una competencial del perfil y una descripción multidimensional del fenómeno.” Sendebar 27: 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, M. 2002. “Combining MT and TM on a Technology-Oriented Translation Masters: Aims and Perspectives.” In Proceedings of the 6th EAMT Workshop on Teaching Machine Translation, 123–129. Allschwil, Switzerland: European Association for Machine Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Suokas, J., K. Pukarinen, S. von Wolff, and K. Koskinen. 2015. “Testing Testing: Putting Translation Usability to Test.” Trans-kom 8 (2): 499–519.
   Google Scholar
• Taibi, M., and U. Ozolins. 2016. Community Translation. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Valero-Garcés, C. 2013. “Formación de traductores e intérpretes en una sociedad multicultural. El programa de la Universidad de Alcalá.” Cuadernos de ALDEEU 25: 215–238.
   Google Scholar
• Valero-Garcés, C. 2019. “Intercultural Communication, Public Service Interpreting and Translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Translation Studies, edited by R. Valdeón García and A. Vidal Claramonte, 211–226. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315520131-13.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, L. N., and E. Alonso. 2020. “Translating Perceptions and Managing Expectations: An Analysis of Management and Production Perspectives on Machine Translation.” Perspectives 28 (2): 163–184. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2019.1646776.
   Google Scholar
• Vigier Moreno, F. J., and L. Pérez Macías. 2020. “¿Es eficaz las posedición para la traducción inversa de textos jurídicos? Una experiencia con estudiantes de posgrado.” In Claves para la innovación pedagógica antes los nuevos retos: Respuestas en la vanguardia de la práctica educativa, edited by E. López Meneses, D. Cobos Sánchez, L. Molina García, A. Jaén Martínez, and A. H. Martín Padilla, 2499–2508. Barcelona: Octaedro.
   Google Scholar