Understanding what young people know: methodological and theoretical challenges in researching young people’s knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust

Bibliography

• Bischoping, Katherine. “Method and Meaning in Holocaust-Knowledge Surveys." Holocaust and Genocide Studies 12, no. 3 (1998): 454–474. doi: 10.1093/hgs/12.3.454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, Norman. Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing knowledge 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). GCSE Bitesize, History, Assassination at Sarajevo, 2014. Retrieved 1st April 2016 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/ir1/assassinationrev1.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, Mario and Peter Lee. “Learning Historical Concepts.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. Keith Sawyer, 587–604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, Bruce and Geoffrey Short. “Holocaust Education, Anti-racism and Citizenship.” Educational Review 49, no. 3 (1997): 271–282. doi: 10.1080/0013191970490306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, Arthur, Chris Edwards, Emily Goldsmith, Kay Andrews, John Brown, Adrian Burgess, Evangelos Himonides, et al. Evaluation of the Holocaust Educational Trust’s Lessons from Auschwitz Project: Final report. London: Institute of Education, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, Caroline, Jim Donohue and Sarah North. Exploring English Grammar: From formal to functional. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. Suzanne, and John D. Bransford. “Introduction.” In How Students Learn: History in the classroom, edited by Suzanne M. Donovan and John D. Bransford, 1–26. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Stuart, Alice Pettigrew, Andy Pearce, Rebecca Hale, Adrian Burgess, Paul Salmons, and Ruth-Anne Lenga. What Do Students Know and Understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English Secondary Schools. London: UCL Institute of Education, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Graham. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with Nvivo: Explorations with NVivo. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, Elena. “Ukrainian High School Students’ Understanding of the Holocaust.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 18 (2004): 402–420. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dch086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedwab, Jack. “Measuring Holocaust Knowledge and Its Impact: A Canadian Case Study.” Prospects 40 (2010): 273–287. doi: 10.1007/s11125-010-9153-7
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Burke R., and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33, no. 7 (2004): 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Burke R., Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, and Lisa A. Turner. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Method Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, no. 2 (2007): 112–133. doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, Udo. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods In Research Practice: Purposes And Advantages.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 4 (2006): 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kuukkanen, J. M. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Peter. “Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History.” In How Students Learn: History in the classroom, edited by Suzanne M. Donovan and John D. Bransford, 31–74. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Peter, and Denis Shemilt. “Is Any Explanation Better than None? Over-determined Narratives, Senseless Agencies and One-way Streets in Students’ Learning about Cause and Consequence in History.” Teaching History 137 (2009): 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lévesque, Stéphane. Thinking Historically: Educating Students for the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. “Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research.” Qualitative Health Research 8, no. 3 (1998): 362–376. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. “Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Required: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, no. 1 (2007): 48–76. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Isadore, Carolyn S. Ridenour, Carole Newman, and George Mario Paul DeMarco. “A Typology of Research Purposes and its Relationship to Mixed Methods.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie, 167–188. California: Sage Publications, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Nancy L. Leech. “Enhancing the Interpretation of Significant Findings: The Role of Mixed Methods Research.” The Qualitative Report 9, no. 4 (2004): 770–792.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Alice, Stuart Foster, Jonathan Howson, Paul Salmons, Ruth-Anne Lenga, and Kay Andrews. Teaching about the Holocaust in English Secondary Schools: An Empirical Study of National Trends, Perspectives And Practice. London: Institute of Education, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Rick. “Frameworks for Big History: Teaching History at Its Lower Resolutions.” In Master Class in History Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning, edited by Christine Counsell, Katharine Burn and Arthur Chapman, 59–76. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, Peter. “A Model of Historical Thinking.” Educational Philosophy and Theory. Published online: 27 Oct 2015. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Martin. What is Genocide? Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Processes for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, Pinchas. “Justifying the Selection of Answers in Multiple Choice Items.” International Journal of Science Education 12, no. 5 (1990): 563–573. doi: 10.1080/0950069900120508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Don. “Colligatoin and History Teaching.” In Studies in the Nature and Teaching of History, edited by Wyndham Hedley Burston and Donald Thompson, 85–106. London: Routledge and K. Paul, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Van Drie, Jannet, and Carla van Boxtel. “Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning about the Past.” Educational Psychology Review 20, no. 2 (2008): 87–110. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, William. H. “Colligatory Concepts in History.” In The Philosophy of History, edited by Patrick L. Gardiner, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, James. “Does the Linguistic Release the Conceptual? Helping Year 10 to Improve their Causal Reasoning.” Teaching History 119 (2005): 5–14.
   Google Scholar