References
- Avlon, J. (2012). Democrats for education reform? Why policy fault lines are shifting. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/14/democrats-for-education-reform-why-policy-fault-lines-are-shifting.html
- Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Ball, S. J. (2010). New voices, new knowledges and the new politics of education research: The gathering of a perfect storm? European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 124–137. doi:10.2304/eerj.2010.9.2.124
- Ball, S. J. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549–566. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
- Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance, and education. Chicago, IL: The Policy Press. doi: 10.1332/policypress/9781847429803.001.0001
- Bodgan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Brookings Institution. (2015, March 4). Measuring and understanding education advocacy. Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy at The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2015/03/04-ed-advocacy/understanding-and-measuring-education-advocacy_final.pdf
- Brown, R. (2012). The education upstarts. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/10/education-upstarts/309097/
- Buras, K. L. (2013). ‘We’re not going nowhere’: Race, urban space, and the struggle for King Elementary school in New Orleans. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.741072
- Camera, L. (2014, October 22). Education-focused spending crosses party lines. Education Week. Retrieved from: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2014/10/education-focused_campaign_spe.html
- Coffey, A. A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
- DeBray, E., Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & Jabbar, H. (2014). Intermediary organizations in charter school policy coalitions: Evidence from New Orleans. Educational Policy, 28(2), 175–206. doi:10.1177/0895904813514132
- DeBray-Pelot, E., & McGuinn, P. (2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Educational Policy, 23(1), 15–42. doi:10.1177/0895904808328524
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a ractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. In Policy analysis (pp. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019924264X.001.0001
- Friedman, M. (1995, June 23). Public schools: Make them private (Cato Briefing Paper No. 23). Retrieved from www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub-id1463
- Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
- Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518. doi:10.3102/0002831207306764
- La Londe, P. G., Brewer, T. J., & Lubienski, C. A. (2015). Teach for America and teach for all: Creating an intermediary organization network for global education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 47. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.1829
- Libby, K., & Sanchez, A. (2011, fall). For or against children? The problematic history of stand for children. Rethinking Schools. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/26_01/26_01_sanchez.shtml
- Lowery, W. (2013, August 21). Connolly rejects $500,000 pledge from outside group. Boston Globe. Retrieved from http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2013/08/21/connolly-ask-stand-for-children-not-spend-money-his-behalf-swears-off-money-from-outside-groups/mg9CFEmes269Pl8U6KkDII/story.html
- McFarlane, C. (2012, February 22). Public face hides real agenda. Worcester Telegram & Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.telegram.com/article/20120222/COLUMN44/102229922/0
- McGuinn, P. (2012a, summer). Fight club: Are advocacy organizations changing the politics of education? Education Next (pp. 25–31). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/fight-club/
- McGuinn, P. (2012b). Stimulating reform: Race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159. doi:10.1177/0895904811425911
- Mehta, J. (2013). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of american educational policy, 1980-2001. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 285–324. doi:10.3102/0002831212471417
- Mehta, J., & Teles, S. (2011). Jurisdictional politics: A new federal role in education. In F. M. Hess & A. P. Kelly (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a halfcentury of federal efforts to improve America’s schools (pp. 197–216). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Retrieved from http://hepg.org/hep-home/books/carrots,-sticks,-and-the-bully-pulpit
- National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
- National Council on Teacher Quality. (2015). State of the states 2015: Teacher effectiveness policies. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nctq.org/dmsView/2015_State_Teacher_Policy_Yearbook_National_Summary_NCTQ_Report.
- Oliver, P. E., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 37–54.
- Ranson, S. (2012). Remaking public spaces for civil society. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 245–261. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.709468
- Rogers, R. (2004). A critical discourse analysis of literate identities across contexts: Alignment and conflict. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 51–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 189–220). Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Sawchuk, S. (2012a, May 16). New players wield policy clout in state-level legislative battles. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/16/31adv-state.h31.html
- Sawchuk, S. (2012b, May 16). New breed of advocacy groups shakes up education field. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/16/31adv-overview_ep.h31.html
- Sawchuk, S. (2012c, May 23). Tensions mark relationships between new organizations and teachers’ unions. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/23/32adv-union_ep.h31.html
- Scott, J., Jabbar, H., LaLonde, P., DeBray, E., & Lubienski, C. (2015). Evidence use and advocacy coalitions: Intermediary organizations and philanthropies in Denver, Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 124. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.2079
- Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Stovall, D. (2013). Against the politics of desperation: Educational justice, critical race theory, and Chicago school reform. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 33–43. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.739192
- Tabb, W. K. (2002). Unequal partners: A primer on globalization. New York, NY: New Press.
- Ujifusa, A. (2016, May 24). Jeb bush will once again lead the education advocacy group he founded. Education Week. Retrieved from: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2016/05/jeb_bush_foundation_chairman_return.html
- Vidovich, L. (2007). Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3), 285–298. doi:10.1080/00131910701427231
- Walton Family Foundation. (2011). 2011 Education Reform Grants. Retrieved from http://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/who-we-are/grant-reports-financials/2011-walton-family-foundation-grants
- Weible, C. M. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95–117. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj015
- Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2007). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 123–136). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.