688
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The educational aims of the OECD in its TALIS insight and lesson reports: exploring societal orientations

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 166-179 | Received 25 Apr 2016, Accepted 17 Aug 2017, Published online: 30 Aug 2017

References

  • Acevedo, G. A., Ellison, C. G., & Yilmaz, M. (2015). Religion and child-rearing values in Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 36(12), 1595–1623. doi:10.1177/0192513X13504921
  • Akiba, M. (2015). Measuring teachers’ professional learning activities in international context. In A. Wiseman & G. LeTendre (Eds.), Monitoring and promoting national teacher quality (pp. 87–110). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. (2009). Policy-making in education: A holistic approach in response to global changes. New York: R&L Education.
  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class, codes, and control. London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev ed.). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bhalla, A. S., & Lapeyre, F. (2004). Poverty and exclusion in a global world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Carney, S. (2008). Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63–88. doi:10.1086/593152
  • Carroll, P., & Kellow, A. (2011). The OECD: A study of organisational adaptation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Chitty, C. (1995). Victory of the minimalists and privatisers? Oxford Review of Education, 21(2), 233–237. doi:10.1080/0305498950210207
  • Cohen, A. B., & Hill, P. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 709–742. doi:10.1111/jopy.2007.75.issue-4
  • Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229. doi:10.1080/17508480902998421
  • Da Silva Lopes, B., Albergaria-Almeida, P., & Martinho, M. (2015). Learning and teaching in Portugal: An analysis of TALIS 2013. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 630–636. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.045
  • Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2007). Globalisation & pedagogy: Space, place and identity. London: Routledge.
  • Feniger, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845–855. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.892156
  • Feniger, Y., Livneh, I., & Yogev, A. (2012). Globalisation and the politics of international tests: The case of Israel. Comparative Education, 48(3), 323–335. doi:10.1080/03050068.2011.622539
  • Gould, K. H. (1995). The misconstruing of multiculturalism: The Stanford debate and social work. Social Work, 40(2), 198–205.
  • Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism–collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1088868311411587
  • Harpaz, Y. (2008). Good teaching, logics in the spirit of Lamm. Hed Hachinuch, 82(7), 60–66. [Hebrew].
  • Harpaz, Y. (2015). An ideological perspective. In R. Wegerif, L. L. James, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking. Oxon, UK and NY, NY: Routledge.
  • Hartley, D. (2003). Education as a global positioning device: Some theoretical considerations. Comparative Education, 39(4), 439–450. doi:10.1080/0305006032000162011
  • Higginbotham, P. J. (1976). Aims of education. In D. I. Lloyd (Ed.), Philosophy and the Teacher (pp. 41–52). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Holtmaat, E. (2011). Neoliberal policies and international organizations: The OECD and higher education policy. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
  • Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2008). Toward a model of cross-cultural business ethics: The impact of individualism and collectivism on the ethical decision-making process. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 293–305. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9888-8
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113–135. doi:10.1017/S0267190502000065
  • Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329–342.
  • Kawashima, K. (2005). Interpersonal relationships in Japanese and Australian women’s magazines: A case study. In I. Mushin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society, (pp. 1–18). Sydney: University of Sydney.
  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. doi:10.1177/1028315303260832
  • Kohn, M. L. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  • Lamm, Z. (1976). Conflicting theories of instruction. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Lamm, Z. (1986). Ideologies and educational thought. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Psychology and Counseling in Education (pp. 5–19). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
  • Lawton, D. (1994). The Tory Mind on Education: 1979-1994. London: Falmer Press.
  • Lejano, R. P., & Dodge, J. (2017). The narrative properties of ideology: The adversarial turn and climate skepticism in the USA. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 195–215.
  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). Globalisation and sociology of education policy: The case of PISA. In R. Brooks, M. McCormack & K. Bhopal (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the sociology of education (pp. 19–38). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), 3–48.
  • Marples, R. (ed.). (1999). The aims of education. London: Routledge.
  • McBride, R. E., Xiang, P., Wittenburg, D., & Shen, J. (2002). An analysis of preservice teachers’ dispositions toward critical thinking: A cross-cultural perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 131–140. doi:10.1080/13598660220135649
  • McMillan, J. H. (2010). The practical implications of educational aims and contexts for formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 41–58). New York: Routledge.
  • Miller, D. R., & Swanson, G. E. (1958). The changing American parent. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Mooney Simmie, G., Moles, J., & O’Grady, E. (2016). Good teaching as a messy narrative of change within a policy ensemble of networks, superstructures and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1219960
  • Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, R., & Verger, A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of global education policy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Murphy, P. (2008). Defining pedagogy. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 28–39). London & Milton Keynes: Sage and The Open University.
  • OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2014). New insights from TALIS 2013. Teaching and learning in primary and upper secondary education. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2016). Supporting teacher professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. Paris: Author.
  • Reynolds, K. (1991). Restructuring the welfare state - the case of the abolition of the Inner London Education Authority. Critical Social Policy, 11(32), 72–81. doi:10.1177/026101839101103206
  • Robertson, S. L. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607. doi:10.1086/667414
  • Robertson, S. L. (2016). The global governance of teachers’ work. In K. Mundy, A. Green, R. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 275–290). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rubinson, R., & Browne, I. (1994). Education and the economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 581–599). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rutkowski, D.(2007). Converging us softly: How intergovernmental organizations promote neoliberal educational policy. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 229–247. doi:10.1080/17508480701494259
  • Rutkowski, L., Von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. New York: CRC Press.
  • Ryan, B. (1998). Competency-based reforms to Australian teaching: The last rites for social democracy. Journal of Education Policy, 13(1), 91–113. doi:10.1080/0268093980130106
  • Sargent, L. (2009). Contemporary political ideologies: A comparative analysis. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.
  • Sartori, G. (1969). Politics, ideology, and belief systems. American Political Science Review, 63, 398–411. doi:10.1017/S0003055400262291
  • Schleicher, A. (2015). Strengthening teacher’s sense of effectiveness. Education Journal, 43(1), 1–33.
  • Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform. Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD.
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. doi:10.1002/berj.3120
  • Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 703. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
  • Sorensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. L. (2017). The OECD program TALIS and framing, measuring and selling quality Teacher™. In M. Akiba & G. K. LeTendre (eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy. New York: Routledge.
  • Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of education: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Street, B. (1993). Culture is a verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural process. In D. Graddol & M. Byram (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 23–43). Clevedon: BAAL & Multilingual Matters.
  • Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. Lanham: R&L Education
  • Talbot, M. (2005). Choosing to refuse to be a victim: ‘Power feminism’ and the intertextuality of victimhood and choice. In M. M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis (pp. 167–180). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thornton, R. J. (1988). Culture: A contemporary definition. In E. Boonzaier & J. S. Sharp (Eds.), South African keywords: The uses and abuses of political concepts (pp. 17–28). Cape Town: David Philip.
  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Two approaches to critical discourse analysis. In S. Titscher, M. Meyer, R. Wodak, & E. Vetter (Eds.), Methods of text and discourse analysis (pp. 144–170). London: Sage.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview press.
  • Vajpeyi, A. (2002). Teaching against communalism: Role of social science pedagogy. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(51), 5093–5097.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 8, 5–6.
  • Walker, J. (2009). The inclusion and construction of the worthy citizen through lifelong learning: A focus on the OECD. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 335–351. doi:10.1080/02680930802669276
  • Woodward, R. (2009). The organisation for economic co-operation and development. London: Routledge.
  • Yemini, M., Bar-Nissan, H., & Shavit, Y. (2014). Cosmopolitanism versus nationalism in Israeli education. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 708–728. doi:10.1086/677305
  • Yemini, M., & Fulop, A. (2015). The international, global and intercultural dimensions in schools: An analysis of four internationalised Israeli schools. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(4), 528–552. doi:10.1080/14767724.2014.967185
  • Youdell, D., & McGimpsey, I. (2015). Assembling, disassembling and reassembling ‘youth services’ in Austerity Britain. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 116–130. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.975734

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.