The turn towards policy mobilities and the theoretical-methodological implications for policy sociology

References

• Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2006). Between the physical and the virtual: Connected mobilities? In M. Sheller & J. Urry (Eds.), Mobile technologies of the city (pp. 44–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1161–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543348
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3439
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2017). Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Temenos, C. (2015). Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 824–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12252
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2009). The governance turn! Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 537–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903239904
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. (2017). Institutionalising mobilities research: Networks, regions, futures. New Zealand Geographer, 73(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12167
   Google Scholar
• Bok, R., & Coe, N. M. (2017). Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities, 63(March), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2011). Introduction: Mobile methods. In M. Büscher, J. Urry, & K. Witchger (Eds.), Mobile methods (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorising the social. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A., & Ward, K. (2012). Researching the geographies of policy mobility: Confronting the methodological challenges. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44176
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (2017). Market mobilities/immobilities: Mutation, path-dependency, and the spread of charter school policies in the United States. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1242507
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. B., Le, H., & Sustarsic, M. (2019). Spatialising a global education phenomenon: Private tutoring and mobility theory in Cambodia. Journal of Education Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1610192
   Google Scholar
• Farley, H., & Hopkins, S. (2017). The prison is another country: Incarcerated students and (im)mobility in Australian prisons. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1255240
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K., Lewis, S., Lingard, B., Lubienski, C., Takayama, K., & Webb, P. T. (2017). Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1288150
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K., & Sellar, S. (2019). Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818813144
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K., & Symes, C. (2017). Making moves: Theorisations of education and mobility. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1317756
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2015). For slow research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 838–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12257
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2020). Providing a platform for ‘what works’: Platform-based governance and the reshaping of teacher learning through the OECD’s PISA4U. Comparative Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1769926
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Savage, G. C., & Holloway, J. (2019). Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1636140
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). ‘PISA for Schools’: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/684458
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2018). The critical challenge: Policy networks and market models for education. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317751275
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., Parisi, L., & Terranova, T. (2012). Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412454552
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (2012). Introduction: A perpertual inventory. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44178
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2015). Thinking through dualisms in urban policy studies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 828–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12254
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M. (2017). Affect theory and policy mobility: Challenges and possibilities for critical policy research. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1308875
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M., Bieler, A., & McNeil, R. (2015). Education policy mobility: Reimagining sustainability in neoliberal times. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.993934
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, L., & Whitburn, B. (2020). Seven reasons to question the hegemony of visible learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1480474
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, A. S. (2017). Nomadic political ontology and transnational academic mobility. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1264987
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (1987). Studying education through the lives of policy makers: An attempt to close the micro-macro gap. In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds.), Changing policies, changing teachers: New directions for schooling? (pp. 138–150). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930902733121
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2019). Problematising policy: The development of (critical) policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1697718
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilising policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoeva, N., Klutas, A., & Suominen, O. (2019). Making and mobilising context in policy and research. In R. Gorur, S. Sellar, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2019: Comparative methodology in the era of big data and global networks (pp. 202–218). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2015). ‘Arriving at’ urban policies: The topological spaces of urban policy mobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 831–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12255
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2012). Ethnographic circulations: Space–time relations in the worlds of poverty management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44180
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C., & Lewis, S. (2018). The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system. Journal of Education Policy, 33(1), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1325518
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Mobilising the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. G. (2003). World city topologies. Progress in Human Geography, 27(5), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph447oa
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K., & Lingard, B. (2019). Datafication of schooling in Japan: An epistemic critique through the ‘problem of Japanese education’. Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1518542
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036002002
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. (2015). Policy scientificity 3.0: Theory and policy analysis in-and-for this world and other-worlds. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.949812
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Player-Koro, C., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Education recoded: Policy mobilities in the international ‘learning to code’ agenda. Journal of Education Policy, 34(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1476735
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as standardisation in data-scientific education policy, technology and governance. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556215
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D., & McGimpsey, I. (2015). Assembling, disassembling and reassembling ‘youth services’ in Austerity Britain. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.975734
   Google Scholar