The politics of critical policy sociology: mobilities, moorings and elite networks

References

• Apple, M. W. (1996). Power, meaning and identity: Critical sociology of education in the United States. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569960170201
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230302
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2007). The cosmopolitan condition: Why methodological nationalism fails. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764070240072505
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, D., & Fuller, G. (Eds.). (2013). Stillness in a Mobile World. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2014). Cultural and gender politics in Australian education, the rise of edu-capitalism and the ‘fragile project’ of critical educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(5), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0158-8
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society.Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• David, M., Weiner, G., & Arnot, M. (2000). Gender equality and schooling, education policy-making and feminist research in England and Wales in the 1990s. In Salisbury, J., & Riddell, S. (Eds.), Gender, policy, and educational change: Shifting agendas in the UK and Europe (pp. 19–36). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K. (2002). Getting beyond the ‘official line’: Reflections on dilemmas of access, knowledge and power in researching policy networks. Journal of Social Policy, 31(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279402006505
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110071002
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2003). Realizing policy: The who and how of policy production. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300303026
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., Molla, T., & Parker, S. (2017). The illusion of meritocracy and the audacity of elitism: Expanding the evaluative space in education. In S. Parker, K. N. Gulson, & T. Gale (Eds.), Policy and inequality in education (pp. 7-21). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J. (2015). Counterpublics, crisis and critique: A feminist socio-historical approach to researching policy. In K. Gulson, M. Clarke, & E. Bendix Peterson (Eds.), Education policy and contemporary theory: Implications for research (pp. 122–133). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J. (2017). The refugee crisis, non-citizens, border politics and education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(6), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1227959
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., Rudolph, S., & Sriprakash, A. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416672694
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R., Hamilton, M., Lundahl, C., & Sundström Sjödin, E. (2019). Politics by other means? STS and research in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1549700
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K. N., Lewis, S., Lingard, B., Lubienski, C., Takayama, K., Webb, P. T. (2017). Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1288150
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. (2018). The politics of public education: Reform ideas and issues. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, S., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Contextualizing the datafication of schooling: A comparative discussion of Germany and Russia. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1618887
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A. (2016). NAPLAN and the role of edu-business: New governance, new privatisations and new partnerships in Australian education policy. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0162-z
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, M. (2018). Talkin’ bout a revolution: The call for transformation and reform in Indigenous education. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(5), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0277–8
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical Theory. Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalir, B. (2013). Moving subjects, stagnant paradigms: Can the ‘mobilities paradigm’ transcend methodological nationalism? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723260
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., & Fahey, J. (2008). Imagining research otherwise. In J. Kenway & J. Fahey (Eds.), Globalizing the Research Imagination (pp. 1–40). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2004). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236998
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2020). The turn towards policy mobilities and the theoretical-methodological implications for policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1808499
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Hogan, A. (2019). Reform first and ask questions later? The implications of (fast) schooling policy and ‘silver bullet’ solutions. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1219961
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (1993). The changing state of policy production in education: Some Australian reflections on the state of policy sociology. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 3(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021930030102
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Savage, G. C. (2014). Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: The effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.919846
   Google Scholar
• Maylor, U. (2009). Is it because I’m Black? A Black female research experience. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320802650949
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, A. S. (2017). Nomadic political ontology and transnational academic mobility. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1264987
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, M. (2015). Elites: A general model. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, H. (2006). The in/visible journey: Black women’s lifelong lessons in higher education. In C. Leathwood & B. Francis (Eds.), Gender and lifelong learning: Critical feminist engagements (pp. 137–152). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2009). Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites. Journal of Social Policy, 38(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990018
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute for British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Gewirtz, S. (1994). Sex, lies and audiotape: Interviewing the education policy elite. In D. Halpin & B. Troyna (Eds.), Researching education policy: Ethical and methodological issues (pp. 145–167). Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2011). Researching the powerful: Seeking knowledge about policy. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2011.10.2.218
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2019). Problematising policy: The development of (critical) policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1697718
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2008). Embedding policy mobilities. Working paper, Department of Geography, Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44179
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast Policy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2017). Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology. Area, 49(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12319
   Google Scholar
• Prunty, J. (1985). Signposts for a critical educational policy analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 29(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494418502900205
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. (2016). ‘Cruel Optimism’ and contemporary Australian critical theory in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.793929
   Google Scholar
• Regmi, K. (2019). Critical policy sociology: Key underlying assumptions and their implications for educational policy research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1398228
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2015). ‘Arriving At’ urban policies: The topological spaces of urban policy mobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 831–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12255
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2016). Think tanks, education and elite policy actors. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0185-0
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2015). Introduction to elites: From ‘the problematic of the proletariat’ to a class analysis of ‘wealth elites’. The Sociological Review, 63(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12281
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Williams, K. (2008). Elites: Remembered in capitalism and forgotten by social sciences. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00759.x
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2008). Modes of power and the re-conceptualisation of elites. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00760.x
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. P. (1978). Critical social theory: An introduction and critique. The British Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/589216
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., Savage, G. C., & Gorur, R. (2014). The politics of disagreement in critical education policy studies: A response to Morsy, Gulson and Clarke. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.890269
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. (2019). Learning personalisation: Technics, disorientation and governance. In A. Wilkins & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches to research (pp. 43–62). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Thunig, A., & Jones, T. (2020). ‘Don’t make me play house-n***er: Indigenous academic women treated as ‘black performer’ within higher education. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00405-9
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2003). Global Complexity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M, F. D (Ed). (1971). Knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar