The teaching apparatus: A material-discursive entanglement of tasks and friendship in the upper-secondary classroom

References

• Aagaard, J. (2017). Breaking down barriers: The ambivalent nature of technologies in the classroom. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816631505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht-Crane, C. (2005). Pedagogy as friendship: Identity and affect in the conservative classroom. Cultural Studies: Critical Pedagogy in Conservative Contexts, 19(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500219548
   Google Scholar
• Alirezabeigi, S., Masschelein, J., & Decuypere, M. (2022). The timescape of school tasks: Towards algorhythmic patterns of on-screen tasks. Critical Studies in Education, 64(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.2009532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appels, L., De Maeyer, S., Faddar, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2022). Capturing quality. Educational quality in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: A systematic review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(4), 629–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2115519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodén, L. (2017). Going with the affective flows of digital school absence text messages. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1247859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodén, L., Lenz Taguchi, H., Moberg, E., & Taylor, C. (2020). Relational materialism. In G. W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.789
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. (2018). Doing ethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441874
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480902998421
   Google Scholar
• Danvers, E. (2021). Individualised and instrumentalised? Critical thinking, students and the optics of possibility within neoliberal higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(5), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1592003
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., & Palmer, A. (2016). How scientific concepts come to matter in early childhood curriculum: Rethinking the concept of force. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1201–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9652-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600378
   Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B. P. (2020). Tuning into ‘fleshy’ frequencies: A posthuman mapping of affect, sound and de/colonized literacies with/in a primary classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(1), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420914125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23(5), 680–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415605174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2017). Sociomateriality in posthuman practice theory. In A. Hui, T. R. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 38–51). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2021). A posthumanist epistemology of practice. In C. Neesham (Ed.), Handbook of philosophy of management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_53-1
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R., Hamilton, M., Lundahl, C., & Sjödin, E. S. (2019). Politics by other means? STS and research in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1549700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., Taylor, C. A., & Fairchild, N. (2021). Pedagogies of mattering: Re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. E. (2022). Making connections: Authenticity and alienation within students’ relationships in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1842335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, F., & Tondeur, J. (2021). Untangling the sociomateriality of the classroom: Biographies of school spaces (c. 1960–2014). Oxford Review of Education, 47(5), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1924654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, A., & Riddle, S. (2022). Relational pedagogy and the role of informality in renegotiating learning and teaching encounters. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(5), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1875261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, A., & Riddle, S. (2023). Performative enactments of pedagogy in the classroom: Strategies and tactics of relationality. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2187438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, P., & Treusch, P. (2015). Introduction: Teaching with feminist materialisms. In P. Hinton & P. Treusch (Eds.), Teaching with feminist materialisms (pp. 1–22). ATGENDER, The European Association for gender Research, Education and Documentation.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2021). Metrics, standards and alignment in teacher policy: Critiquing fundamentalism and imagining pluralism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4814-1
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M. (2014). Changing the organization: Architecture and stories as material-discursive practices of producing “schools for the future”. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 12(2), 25–37. https://tamarajournal.com/index.php/tamara/article/view/375
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M. (2020). Mattering pedagogy in precarious times of (un)learning. Journal of New Materialist Research, 1(1), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v1i1.30067
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316634217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, C. F. (2021). Apparatus and its uses: ‘Ecologising’ diffraction as a materialist-epistemological practice. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 2(4), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v2i2.35892
   Google Scholar
• Klykken, F. H. (2021). ‘Are we going to do that now?’ Orientations and response-abilities in the embodied classroom. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1998794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klykken, F. H. (2022). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., & Schnettler, B. (2012). Videography: Analysing video data as a ‘focused’ ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111436147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landri, P. (2022). Waves of standardisation. In H. Riese, L. T. Hilt, & G. E. Søreide (Eds.), Educational standardisation in a complex world (pp. 25–42). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-589-920221002
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: A comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903428622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2012). Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112436655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (2003). Making spaces: Teacher workplace topologies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(3), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360300200179
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2012). Affective assemblages: Body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649413
   Google Scholar
• Nerland, M. (2022). Organisational learning in complex epistemic environments: Reflections from studies of professional work in Norway. The Learning Organization, 29(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2022-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESH. (2016). The national committee for research ethics in the social sciences and the humanities: Guidelines for research ethics. Retrieved 27.02.2020 from http://www.etikkom.no/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer/Samfunnsvitenskap-jus-og-humaniora/
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045252
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (2000). School field trips and the curriculum of public spaces. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (2004). Educational scale-making. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200205
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. C., Olesen, J. S., Plauborg, H., Simovska, V., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2022). Exploring educational (un)readiness through the concepts of dispositive, assemblage and actor-network. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00284-9
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2023:1. Kvalitetsvurdering og kvalitetsutvikling i skolen — Et kunnskapsgrunnlag. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2023-1/id2961070/
   Google Scholar
• NSD. (2020). Norwegian centre for research data: Data protection in research. Retrieved 18.04.2020 from https://www.nsd.no/personverntjenester/oppslagsverk-for-personvern-i-forskning
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plauborg, H. (2016). Klasseledelse gentænkt. Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Plauborg, H. (2018). Towards an agential realist concept of learning. Subjectivity, 11(4), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, A. B. (2021). Teaching curriculum theory as a Baradian apparatus. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(12), 2029–2042. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1972415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riese, H., Samara, A., & Lillejord, S. (2012). Peer relations in peer learning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(5), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.605078
   Google Scholar
• Roehl, T. (2012). From witnessing to recording – Material objects and the epistemic configuration of science classes. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649415
   Google Scholar
• Rosén Rasmussen, L. (2021). Building Pedagogies. A historical study of teachers’ spatial work in new school architecture. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1857495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2012). ‘It’s all about relationships’: Hesitation, friendship and pedagogical assemblage. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.632165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00296.x
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, D. M., & Rabøl Hansen, H. (2018). Bullying, social exclusion anxiety and longing for belonging. Nordic Studies in Education, 38(4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-2018-04-03
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., & Brøgger, K. (2020). In the mood of data and measurements: Experiments as affirmative critique, or how to curate academic value with care. Feminist Theory, 21(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120967301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivale, C. J. (2000). The folds of friendship - derrida - deleuze - foucault. Angelaki, 5(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250020012160
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. J., & Martin, A. D. (2022). Toward a critical posthuman understanding of teacher development and practice: A multi-case study of beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 1–11. Article 103688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (2018). What can bodies do? En/gendering body-space choreographies of stillness, movement and flow in post-16 pedagogic encounters. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, J. (2020). Student feedback apparatuses in higher education: An agential realist analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(3), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1494544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Buverie, L., & Simons, M. (2017). School stuff: A pedagogical regime of enunciation? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1229689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittek, L., & Kvernbekk, T. (2011). On the problems of asking for a definition of quality in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research - SCAND J EDUC RES, 55(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.594618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar