A multi-objective stochastic programming model for project-oriented human-resource management optimization

References

• Aero Strategy Management Consulting. (2009). Global MRO market and assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Agustín-Blas, L. E., Salcedo-Sanz, S., Ortiz-García, E. G., Portilla-Figueras, A., Pérez-Bellido, Á. M., & Jiménez-Fernández, S. (2011). Team formation based on group technology: A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm approach. Computers & Operations Research, 38(2), 484–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badria, H., Ghomi, S. F., & Hejazib, T.-H. (2017). A two-stage stochastic programming approach for value-based closed-loop supply chain network design. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu, A., Dereli, T., & Das, S. (2007). Project team selection using fuzzy optimization approach. Cybernetics and Systems: an International Journal, 38(2), 155–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birge, J. R. (1982). The value of the stochastic solution in stochastic linear programs with fixed recourse. Mathematical Programming, 24(1), 314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. (2007). Aircraft maintenance repair and overhaul market study: Glasgow international airport. Airport regions conference (ARC), Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, W., & Boudreau, J. (2010). Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cavdur, F., Sebatli, A., Kose-Kucuk, M., & Rodoplu, C. (2018). A two-phase binary-goal programming-based approach for optimal project-team formation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-J., & Lin, L. (2004). Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(2), 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchio, F., Grenier, S., O’Neill, T. A., Savaria, K., & Willms, J. D. (2012). The effects of collaboration on performance: A multilevel validation in project teams. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 4(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, M., & Maravelias, C. T. (2011). R&D pipeline management: Task interdependencies and risk management. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 616–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corgnet, B. (2010). Team formation and self‐serving biases. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(1), 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, C., Skopik, F., Schall, D., & Dustdar, S. (2011). Interaction mining and skill-dependent recommendations for multi-objective team composition. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 70(10), 866–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farasat, A., & Nikolaev, A. G. (2016). Social structure optimization in team formation. Computers & Operations Research, 74, 127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., Jiang, -Z.-Z., Fan, Z.-P., & Fu, N. (2010). A method for member selection of cross-functional teams using the individual and collaborative performances. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 652–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, M. K., Barker, K., Rocco, C. M., & Whitman, M. G. (2017). A multi-criteria decision analysis technique for stochastic task criticality in project management. Engineering Management Journal, 29(3), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, M., Kabir, G., & Hasin, M. A. A. (2017). Project time–Cost trade-off: A Bayesian approach to update project time and cost estimates. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 12(3), 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J. H., Astudillo, C. A., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Mora-Melià, D., & Candia-Véjar, A. (2016). The multiple team formation problem using sociometry. Computers & Operations Research, 75, 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlaoittinun, O., Bonjour, E., & Dulmet, M. (2008). A multidisciplinary team building method based on competency modelling in design project management. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(3), 163–175.
   Google Scholar
• Housh, M., Ostfeld, A., & Shamir, U. (2013). Limited multi-stage stochastic programming for managing water supply systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 41, 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E. (2000). A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for personnel selection. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Kılıç, Y. E., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2015). A two-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming approach to physical distribution network design. International Journal of Production Research, 53(4), 1291–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu, E., Yaman, H., & Aktürk, M. S. (2011). A multi-stage stochastic programming approach in master production scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. E. (1994). From job‐based to competency‐based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledford, G., & Heneman, H. (2011). Skill based pay. Alexandria, VA: Society for human resource management.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Ruan, D., & Xu, Y. (2005). A study of enterprise human resource competence appraisement. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(3), 289–315.
   Google Scholar
• Madansky, A. (1960). Inequalities for stochastic linear programming problems. Management Science, 6(2), 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Harrison. (2016). IATA 12th maintenance cost conference. Retrieved 18.April, 2017, from. https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/workgroups/Documents/MCC-2016-BKK/D1-1000-1030-mro-forecast-icf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, I. (2010). How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213(2), 455–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2010). The wiley guide to project organization and project management competencies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S. T., & Tang, Z. (2010). Labour-intensive construction sub-contractors: Their critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 732–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. H. (2009). Whole life performance assessment: Critical success factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1146–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchai, A., Reddy, A., & Savarimuthu, N. (2016). Fuzzy based quantum genetic algorithm for project team formation. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT), 12(1), 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo, M. I., Gendron, B., & Rousseau, L.-M. (2017). A two-stage stochastic programming approach for multi-activity tour scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 620–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarzadegan Gilan, S., Sebt, M. H., & Shahhosseini, V. (2012). Computing with words for hierarchical competency based selection of personnel in construction companies. Applied Soft Computing, 12(2), 860–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhar, A., Dvir, D., Milosevic, D., Mulenburg, J., Patanakul, P., Reilly, R., … Srivannaboon, S. (2005). Toward a NASA-specific project management framework. Engineering Management Journal, 17(4), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. S. (2014). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK (®) guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Strnad, D., & Guid, N. (2010). A fuzzy-genetic decision support system for project team formation. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 1178–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Azizi, F., Azizi, F., & Behzadian, M. (2013). A fuzzy inference system with application to player selection and team formation in multi-player sports. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, H. T., Moskowitz, H., & Lee, L. H. (2003). Human resource selection for software development projects using Taguchi’s parameter design. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(1), 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, T.-L. B., Huang, -C.-C., Chu, H.-W., & Gung, R. R. (2004). Novel approach to multi-functional project team formation. International Journal of Project Management, 22(2), 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Turnquist, M. A., & Nozick, L. K. (2004). A nonlinear optimization model of time and resource allocation decisions in projects with uncertainty. Engineering Management Journal, 16(1), 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2015). A win–Win team formation problem based on the negotiation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 44, 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wi, H., Oh, S., Mun, J., & Jung, M. (2009). A team formation model based on knowledge and collaboration. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 9121–9134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wil, V. D. A., Desel, J., & Oberweis, A. (2003). Business process management: Models, techniques, and empirical studies. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Zhang, X. (2013). Multi-objective team formation optimization for new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(3), 804–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zzkarian, A., & Kusiak, A. (1999). Forming teams: An analytical approach. IIE transactions, 31(1), 85–97.
   Google Scholar