Metaheuristic approach to multi-objective ergonomic workforce scheduling for Bi-hazard industrial tasks

References

• Aryanezhad, M. B., Kheirkhah, A. S., Deljoo, V., & Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, S. M. J. (2009). Designing safe job rotation schedules based upon workers’ skills. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(1–2), 193–199. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1446-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asawarungsaengkul, K., & Nanthavanij, S. (2008). Heuristic genetic algorithm for workforce scheduling with minimum total worker-location changeover. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 15(4), 373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borba, B. S. M. C., Fortes, M. Z., Bitencourt, L. A., Ferreira, V. H., Maciel, R. S. … Moreira, B. S. (2019). A review on optimization methods for workforce planning in electrical distribution utilities. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135(September), 286–298. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Carnahan, B. J., Redfern, M. S., & Norman, B. (2000). Designing safe job rotation schedules using optimization and heuristic search. Ergonomics, 43(4), 543–560. doi:10.1080/001401300184404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhard, M., Schoenfelder, J., Fügener, A., & Brunner, J. O. (2018). State of the art in physician scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsi, A., Torabi, S. A., & Mokhtarzadeh, M. (2023). Integrated surgery scheduling by constraint programming and meta-heuristics. International Journal of Management Science & Engineering Management, 18(4), 292–304. doi:10.1080/17509653.2022.2093289
   Google Scholar
• Ghannam, L. W., & Othman, M. (2023). Development of human resource scheduling model in the healthcare sector during the pandemic. International Journal of Management Science & Engineering Management, 19(2), 134–143. doi:10.1080/17509653.2023.2183280
   Google Scholar
• Hochdörffer, J., Hedler, M., & Lanza, G. (2018). Staff scheduling in job rotation environments considering ergonomic aspects and preservation of qualifications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 46(October), 103–114. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Jeunet, J., & Salassa, F. (2023). The discrete time break scheduling problem under fatigue and no preemption: Solution methods and impact of work regulations. International Journal of Production Research, 61(16), 5372–5391. doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2101402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel, G., Aly, M. F., Mohib, A., & Afefy, I. H. (2020). Optimization of a multilevel integrated preventive maintenance scheduling mathematical model using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Management Science & Engineering Management, 15(4), 247–257. doi:10.1080/17509653.2020.1726834
   Google Scholar
• Lodree, E. J., Geiger, C. D., & Jiang, X. (2009). Taxonomy for integrating scheduling theory and human factors: Review and research opportunities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1), 39–51. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Santana, E., Méndez, G., & Franco, C. (2023). On the multi-period combined maintenance and routing optimisation problem. International Journal of Production Research, 61(23), 826–8290. doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2180301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansini, R., & Zanotti, R. (2020). Optimizing the physician scheduling problem in a large hospital ward. Journal of Scheduling, 23(3), 337–361. doi:10.1007/s10951-019-00614-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnerat, F., Dias, J., & Alves, M. J. (2019). Fleet management: A vehicle and driver assignment model. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(1), 64–75. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussavi, S. E., Zare, M., Mahdjoub, M., & Grunder, O. (2019). Balancing high operator’s workload through a new job rotation approach: Application to an automotive assembly line. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 71, 136–144. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanthavanij, S., Yaoyuenyong, S., & Jeenanunta, C. (2010). Heuristic approach to workforce scheduling with combined safety and productivity objective. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 17(4), 319–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanthavanij, S., & Yenradee, P. (1999). Analytical determination of worker assignment with workplace noise consideration. The 25th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Orleans, Louisaina, USA, 411–414.
   Google Scholar
• Nanthavanij, S., & Yenradee, P. (2000). Minimum number of workers and their daily work assignment to operate n noisy machines based on permissible noise exposure limit. The 5th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering - Theory, Application and Practice, Hsinchu, Taiwan, (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• Otto, A., & Battaïa, O. (2017). Reducing physical ergonomic risks at assembly lines by line balancing and job rotation: A survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 111, 467–480. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rählmann, C., & Thonemann, U. W. (2020). Railway crew scheduling with semi-flexible timetables. OR Spectrum, 42(4), 835–862. doi:10.1007/s00291-020-00592-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanamanee, T., & Laoraksakiat, W. (2019). A multi-objective model for ergonomic workforce scheduling with Bi Hazard considerations. 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C), 1–5. doi:10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999914
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, M. R., & Coello Coello, C. A. (2005). Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ε-dominance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3410, 505–519.
   Google Scholar
• Tharmmaphornphilas, W., Green, B., Carnahan, B. J., & Norman, B. A. (2003). Applying mathematical modeling to create job rotation schedules for minimizing occupational noise exposure. AIHA Journal, 64(3), 401–405. doi:10.1080/15428110308984833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongwien, T., & Nanthavanij, S. (2012). Ergonomic workforce scheduling under complex worker limitation and task requirements: Mathematical model and approximation procedure. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 34(5), 541–549.
   Google Scholar
• Wongwien, T., & Nanthavanij, S. (2017a). Multi-objective ergonomic workforce scheduling under complex worker and task constraints. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 24(3), 284–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongwien, T., & Nanthavanij, S. (2017b). Priority-based ergonomic workforce scheduling for industrial workers performing hazardous jobs. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 34(1), 52–60. doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1192567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaoyuenyong, K., & Nanthavanij, S. (2005). Energy-based workforce scheduling problem: Mathematical model and solution algorithms. ScienceAsia, 31(4), 383–393. doi:10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2005.31.383
   Google Scholar
• Yaoyuenyong, S., & Nanthavanij, S. (2006). Hybrid procedure to determine optimal workforce without noise hazard exposure. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(4), 743–764. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2006.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaoyuenyong, S., & Nanthavanij, S. (2008). Heuristic job rotation procedures for reducing daily exposure to occupational hazards. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 14(2), 195–206. doi:10.1080/10803548.2008.11076762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. Y., Ko, J., & Jung, M. C. (2016). A model for developing job rotation schedules that eliminate sequential high workloads and minimize between-worker variability in cumulative daily workloads: Application to automotive assembly lines. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar