Knowledge-based decisions for asset management of urban water infrastructure in Iran and Brazil using a nominal-based multi-criteria group decision method

References

• Alsharqawi, M., Zayed, T., Parvizsedghy, L., Senouci, A., & Al-Derham, H. (2020). Reliability assessment model for water distribution networks. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 11(2), 04019059. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annus, I., Kändler, N., Vaksmann, M., Kaur, K., Truu, M., & Kütt, U. (2024). Pipeline rehabilitation combined strategy for urban water systems. Urban Water Journal, 21(2), 155–167. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2023.2273535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuvanesh Kumar, M., Antony, J., Cudney, E., Furterer, S. L., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Senthil, S. M. (2023). Decision-making through fuzzy TOPSIS and COPRAS approaches for lean tools selection: A case study of automotive accessories manufacturing industry. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 18(1), 26–35. doi:10.1080/17509653.2022.2064356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchraki, F., Hamchaoui, S., & Berreksi, A. (2023). Planning methodology for effective implementation of the rehabilitation policy for drinking water networks. Water Policy, 25(7), 680–700. doi:10.2166/wp.2023.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentan, B., Carpitella, S., Zanfei, A., Gabriel Souza, R., Menapace, A., Meirelles, G. … Izquierdo, J. (2023). Multi criteria analysis applied to ranking rehabilitation strategies of water distribution networks. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. doi:10.1002/mma.9704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukhsh, Z. A., Molegraaf, H., & Jansen, N. (2023). A maintenance planning framework using online and offline deep reinforcement learning. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08560-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambrainha, G. M., & Fontana, M. E. (2018). A multi-criteria decision making approach to balance water supply-demand strategies in water supply systems. Production, 28. doi:10.1590/0103-6513.20170062
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. S., Zhou, J., Zhu, C. Y., Wang, Z. J., Xiong, S. H., Rodríguez, R. M., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2023). Prioritizing real estate enterprises based on credit risk assessment: An integrated multi-criteria group decision support framework. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 120. doi:10.1186/s40854-023-00517-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, G. W., Jo, H. G., Park, H. S., & Jang, D. W. (2020). Application of decision making model for leakage reduction to economic project in water distribution systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s12652-019-01634-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M., Marques, J., & Savić, D. (2020). A flexible approach for the reinforcement of water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Resources Management, 34(14), 4469–4490. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02655-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ercole, M., Righetti, M., Raspati, G. S., Bertola, P., & Maria Ugarelli, R. (2018). Rehabilitation planning of water distribution network through a reliability–based risk assessment. Water, 10(3), 277. doi:10.3390/w10030277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshaboury, N., Abdelkader, E. M., Al-Sakkaf, A., & Alfalah, G. (2021). Teaching-learning-based optimization of neural networks for water supply pipe condition prediction. Water, 13(24), 3546. doi:10.3390/w13243546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, M. E., Levino, N. D. A., Guarnieri, P., & Salehi, S. (2023). Using group decision-making to assess the negative environmental, social and economic impacts of unstable rock salt mines in Maceio, Brazil. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16, 101360. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2023.101360
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, M. E., & Morais, D. C. (2013). Using promethee V to select alternatives so as to rehabilitate water supply network with detected leaks. Water Resources Management, 27(11), 4021–4037. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, M. E., & Morais, D. C. (2016). Decision model to control water losses in distribution networks. Production, 26(4), 688–697. doi:10.1590/0103-6513.201815
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, M. E., & Morais, D. C. (2017). Water distribution network segmentation based on group multi-criteria decision approach. Production, 27. doi:10.1590/0103-6513.208316
   Google Scholar
• Gül, S., & Firat, M. (2020). Determination of priority regions for rehabilitation in water networks by multiple criteria decision making methods. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(3), 1481–1494.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, K. H., Chen, F. H., Hsu, M. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2023). Governance of artificial intelligence applications in a business audit via a fusion fuzzy multiple rule-based decision-making model. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 117. doi:10.1186/s40854-022-00436-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, S. M., Zahiri, A., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Tabari, M. M. R. (2022). Development of multi-objective optimization model for water distribution network using a new reliability index. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(10), 9757–9774. doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04171-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karbassi Yazdi, A., Mehdiabadi, A., Wanke, P. F., Monajemzadeh, N., Correa, H. L., & Tan, Y. (2023). Developing supply chain resilience: A robust multi-criteria decision analysis method for transportation service provider selection under uncertainty. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 18(1), 51–64. doi:10.1080/17509653.2022.2098543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour, D. M., & Eden, C. (2010). Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (1st ed., Vol. 4, pp.1871–935X). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Kuang, L., Liu, Y., & Tang, M. (2021). Non-cooperative behavior management in group decision making by a conflict resolution process and its implementation for pharmaceutical supplier selection. Information Sciences, 567, 131–145. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Ruan, D. (2007). Multi-objective group decision making: Methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques (Vol. VI, p. 408). Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morente-Molinera, J. A., Kou, G., Samuylov, K., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). Using argumentation in expert’s debate to analyze multi-criteria group decision making method results. Information Sciences, 573, 433–452. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, W., Utomo, C., & Iriawan, N. (2022). A bayesian pipe failure prediction for optimizing pipe renewal time in water distribution networks. Infrastructures, 7(10), 136. doi:10.3390/infrastructures7100136
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, M. J., & Jackson, L. (2006). Nominal group technique: A process for initiating curriculum development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2), 129–138. doi:10.1080/03075078312331378994
   Google Scholar
• Onieva, L., & Robles-Velasco, A. (2022). AI Knowledge Transfer from the University to Society Applications in High-Impact Sectors (pp. 91–95). Estados Unidos: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., Hossain, N. U. I., Moktadir, M. A., Mithun Ali, S., Katina, P. F., & Islam, M. S. (2024). A decision support model to assess organizational resilience in the textile industry. International Journal of Management Science & Engineering Management, 19(1), 46–55. doi:10.1080/17509653.2022.2157901
   Google Scholar
• Raspati, G. S., Bruaset, S., Bosco, C., Mushom, L., Johannessen, B., & Ugarelli, R. (2022). A risk-based approach in rehabilitation of water distribution networks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1594. doi:10.3390/ijerph19031594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastpour, E., Kayvanfar, V., & Rafiee, M. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for the evaluating of a real green supply chain in companies with fast-moving consumer goods. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 17(3), 175–187. doi:10.1080/17509653.2022.2037023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, R., Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2020). Managing minority opinions in micro-grid planning by a social network analysis-based large scale group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 189, 105060. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles-Velasco, A., Muñuzuri, J., Onieva, L., & Cortés, P. (2021). An evolutionary fuzzy system to support the replacement policy in water supply networks: The ranking of pipes according to their failure risk. Applied Soft Computing, 111, 107731. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P. K., & Shaw, K. (2021). A multicriteria credit scoring model for SMEs using hybrid BWM and TOPSIS. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 1–27. doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00295-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S. (2017). The development of multi-criteria decision-making model for rehabilitation of water distribution networks ( Doctoral dissertation). Tehran, Iran: Civil Engineering Department. Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, p. 147.
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Fontana, M. E., Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Herrera, M., Sadiq, R., & Mian, H. R. (2024). A fuzzy group decision-making model for water distribution network rehabIlitation. Urban Water Journal, 21(3), 364–379. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2023.2295310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Jalili Ghazizadeh, M., & Tabesh, M. (2018b). A comprehensive criteria-based multi-attribute decision-making model for rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 14(6), 743–765. doi:10.1080/15732479.2017.1359633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Jalili Ghazizadeh, M., Tabesh, M., Valadi, S., & Salamati Nia, S. P. (2021). A risk component-based model to determine pipes renewal strategies in water distribution networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(10), 1338–1359. doi:10.1080/15732479.2020.1842466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Robles-Velasco, A., Seyedzadeh, A., Ghazali, A., & Davoudiseresht, M. (2022). A hybrid knowledge-based method for pipe renewal planning in water distribution systems with limited data: Application to Iran. Utilities Policy, 78, 101407. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2022.101407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., & Salamati Nia, S. P. (2024). A qualitative-risk-based model to assess group decisions for planning the maintenance-renewal works of water pipelines with unreliable operational data. Water Resources Management. doi:10.1007/s11269-024-03807-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Tabesh, M., & Ghazizadeh, M. J. (2019). Development of rehabilitation of pipes in water distribution systems with minimum structural data. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 29(6), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Tabesh, M., & Jalili Ghazizadeh, M. (2018a). HRDM method for rehabilitation of pipes in water distribution networks with inaccurate operational-failure data. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(9), 04018053. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangroula, U., Han, K. H., Koo, K. M., Gnawali, K., & Yum, K. T. (2022). Optimization of water distribution networks using genetic algorithm based SOP–WDN program. Water, 14(6), 851. doi:10.3390/w14060851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, L., Scheidegger, A., Reichert, P., Mauer, M., & Lienert, J. (2014). Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Research, 49, 124–143. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabangu, T. H., Hamam, Y., & Adedeji, K. B. (2020). Decision support systems for leak control in urban water supply systems: A literature synopsis. Procedia CIRP, 90, 579–583. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.120
   Google Scholar
• Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 100, 102141. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trojan, F., & Morais, D. C. (2012). Prioritising alternatives for maintenance of water distribution networks: A group decision approach. Water Sa, 38(4), 555–564. doi:10.4314/wsa.v38i4.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trojan, F., & Morais, D. C. (2015). Maintenance management decision model for reduction of losses in water distribution networks. Water Resources Management, 29(10), 3459–3479. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-0966-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, J., Cabral, M., Almeida, N., Silva, J. G., & Covas, D. (2020). Novel methodology for efficiency-based long-term investment planning in water infrastructures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(12), 1654–1668. doi:10.1080/15732479.2020.1722715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Xu, Z., Su, S. F., & Zhou, W. (2021). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of uncertain group decision making from 1980 to 2019. Information Sciences, 547, 328–353. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., Firat, M., & Ateş, A. (2024). Analysis of network useful life and cost-benefits for sustainable water management. Sigma, 42(1), 130–140. doi:10.14744/sigma.2024.00014
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Zhao, S., Kou, G., Li, C. C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2020). An overview on feedback mechanisms with minimum adjustment or cost in consensus reaching in group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Information Fusion, 60, 65–79. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuluaga, S., Saxe, S., & Karney, B. (2024). Roles of value in the evaluation and modeling of decision strategies for pipe maintenance in water distribution networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024006. doi:10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar