Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: a focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology

References

• Archer, M., Decoteau, C., Gorski, P., Little, D., Porpora, D., Rutzou, T., … Vandenberghe, F. (2016). What is critical realism? Perspectives, 38(2), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., Breckenridge, J., Clark, M. T., Herber, O. R., Wagstaff, C., & Taylor, J. (2017). The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: A focused mapping review and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20, 627–645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1270583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brustad, R. J. (2008). Qualitative research approaches. In T. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 31–44). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. (2016). Rethinking ‘validity’ and ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative inquiry: How might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences? In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 330–339). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, V. F., Macdonald, M. E., & Carnevale, F. A. (2018). Epistemological oppression and the road to awakening: A boot camp, a Twitter storm, and a call to action! International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918763413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Critical realism. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 168–170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. J., Caddick, N., & Frost, N. (2016). Pluralistic data analysis: Theory and practice. In A. Sparkes & B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 368–381). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Criteria for evaluation. In Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 297–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culver, D. M., Gilbert, W., & Sparkes, A. (2012). Qualitative research in sport psychology journals: The next decade 2000–2009 and beyond. The Sport Psychologist, 26, 261–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.26.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culver, D. M., Gilbert, W. D., & Trudel, P. (2003). A decade of qualitative research in sport psychology journals: 1990–1999. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.17.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, M., & Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003). Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: Reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2), 187–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J. (2008). Postpositivism. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 659–664). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018007004
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. (2016). Mixed methods research in sport and exercise: Integrating qualitative research. In A. Sparkes & B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 382–396). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. (2017). It’s a new year … so let’s stop the paradigm wars. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917692647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, N. L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2010). Improving grounded theory research in sport and exercise psychology: Further reflections as a response to Mike Weed. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 405–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayan, M. J. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. New York, NY: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellalieu, S. (2018). Editorial. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 30, 1–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1414513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1999). Qualitative generalizability. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 5–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121956 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paley, J. (2008). Postpositivism. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 647–650). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ronkainen, N. (2018, June). If this is just your reality, why should I believe you?: Exploring challenges in the social constructionist perspective on research quality. Oral presentation at the International Conference on Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2015). A matter of taste: Evaluating the quality of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 22, 86–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 101–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., Sparkes, A. C., Phoenix, C., & Kirkby, J. (2012). Qualitative research in physical therapy: A critical discussion on mixed-method research. Physical Therapy Reviews, 17, 374–381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/1743288X12Y.0000000030
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. K., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Relativism, criteria, and politics. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 915–932). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C. (1998). Validity in qualitative inquiry and the problem of criteria: Implications for sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 12(4), 363–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.12.4.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2009). Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(5), 491–497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health from process to product. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, K. A., & Poucher, Z. A. (2018). Open science in sport and exercise psychology: Review of current approaches and considerations for qualitative inquiry. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 36, 17–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, K. A., & Poucher, Z. A. (in press). Research philosophies. In D. Hackfort & R. Schinke (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, K. A., Poucher, Z. A., Sweet, S. N., & Caron, J. G. (2018). Methodological coherence in qualitative research. Workshop presented at the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology (SCAPPS) Conference, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, G. (2018). A case for critical realism in the pursuit of interdisciplinarity and impact. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10, 525–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2018.1467482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar