References
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party [of national data protection authorities]. 2014. Opinion 7/2014 on the protection of personal data in Quebec, WP219, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp219_en.pdf (accessed 4 June 2014).
- Clark, C. and J. McGhee, eds. 2008. Private and confidential? Handling personal information in social and health services. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Duval, A. 2015a. The Pechstein ruling of the Oberlandesgericht München – Time for a new reform of CAS? International Sports Law Cases, International Sports Law, 19 January 2015. Available at http://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-pechstein-ruling-of-the-oberlandesgericht-munchen-time-for-a-new-reform-of-cas.
- Duval, A. 2015b. The Pechstein ruling of the OLG München ( English Translation). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2561297 (accessed 6 February 2015).
- EDPS [European Data Protection Supervisor]. 2015. Opinion 4/2015: Towards a new digital ethics: Data, dignity and technology. Brussels: EDPS. Available at https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2015/15-09-11_Data_Ethics_EN.pdf.
- European Commission. 2014. Report [...] on the implementation of the European Union work plan for sport 2011–2014. COM(2014) 022, Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0022&from=EN (accessed 24 January 2014), sec. 2.1.
- FRA [European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights] & Council of Europe. 2014. Handbook on European data protection law. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Gutwirth, S., R. Leenes, and Paul de Heert. 2015. Reforming European data protection law. Law, governance and technology series, 20. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8
- Kornbeck, J. 2010. Book review: Clark & McGhee (2008). British Journal of Social Work 40 (7): 2355–2356.10.1093/bjsw/bcq110
- Kornbeck, J. 2015. Pechstein innocentée : quel avenir pour les preuves indirectes? [Pechstein acquitted: What future for the use of indirect evidence?]. La Lettre de l’Officiel Juridique du Sport 94: 6–7.
- MacGregor, O., R. Griffith, D. Ruggiu, and M. McNamee. 2013. Anti-doping, purported rights to privacy and WADA’s whereabouts requirements: A legal analysis. Fair Play 1 (2): 13–38.
- Marty, D., U. Haas, and P. Nicholson. 2015. Cycling Independent Reform Commission: Report to the president of the Union Cycliste Internationale. Lausanne, February 2015. Available at http://www.as.com/misc/pdf/informe-UCI.pdf.
- Miège, C. and J. Jappert, eds. 2013. L’organisation du sport dans les Etats membres de l’Union européenne [The organisation of sport in the member states of the European Union]. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Think tank Sport et Citoyenneté.
- Mortsiefer, L. 2010. Datenschutz im Anti-Doping-Kampf [Data protection in the ant-doping fight]. Bonn: Gardez.
- Neuendorf, S. 2015. Datenschutzrechtliche Konflikte im Anti-Doping-System am Beispiel des Anti-Doping Administration and Management Systems ADAMS [Data protection law conflicts in the anti-doping system illustrated by the Anti-Doping Administration and Management Systems ADAMS]. Baden-Baden: Nomos ( Schriften zum Sportrecht; 35).
- Niewalda, J. 2011. Dopingkontrollen im Konflikt mit allgemeinem Persönlichkeitsrecht und Datenschutz [Doping controls in conflict with the general right of personality and with data protection]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot10.3790/978-3-428-53349-7.
- SIS II Supervision Coordination Group. 2014. The Schengen information system: A guide for exercising the right of access. Brussels: European Data Protection Supervisor. Available at https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Large%20Scale%20IT%20Systems/14-10-28_SIS_II_Guide_of_Access_2014_EN.pdf.
- Waddington, I. 2010. Surveillance and control in sport: A sociologist looks at the WADA whereabouts system. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 2 (3): 255–274.10.1080/19406940.2010.507210
- Warren, S.D. and L.D. Brandeis. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review IV (5): 193–220.10.2307/1321160