305
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Philosophy of Physical Education Oriented toward the Game as an Object. Showing the Inexhaustible Reality of Games through Bernard Suits’ Theory

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • ANDERSON, D. 2002. The humanity of movement or ‘It’s not just a gym class’. Quest 54 (2): 87–96. doi:10.1080/00336297.2002.10491768
  • ARNOLD, P. 1979. Meaning in movement, sport and physical education. London, UK: Heinemann.
  • ASHWORTH, C.E. 1971. Sport as a symbolic dialogue. In The sociology of sport: A selection of readings, edited by E. Dunning. London: Frank Cass: 40–46.
  • BATEMAN, C. 2011. Imaginary games. Winchester: Zero Books.
  • BIESTA, G. 2010. Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • BIESTA, G. 2013. The beautiful risk of education. London: Routledge.
  • BIESTA, G. 2018. What if? Art education beyond expression and creativity. In Art, Artists and Pedagogy. Philosophy and the Arts in Education, edited by C. Naughton, G. Biesta, and D. Cole. London: Routledge: 11–20.
  • BOGOST, I. 2012. Alien phenomenology or what it’s like to be a thing. London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • BRASSIER, R., I.H. GRANT, G. HARMAN, and Q. MEILLASSOUX 2007. Speculative realism. Collapse 3: 306–449.
  • BROADHEAD, P. and A. BURT. 2012. Understanding young children’s learning through play. New York: Routledge.
  • CAILLOIS, R. 1961. Man, play and games. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • CASTRONOVA, E. 2005. Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • COLLINGWOOD, R.G. 1938. The principles of art. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • CONANT, J.B. 1963. The education of American teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • CONNOLLY, M. 2008. The remarkable logic of autism: Developing and describing an embedded curriculum based in semiotic phenomenology. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2): 234–56. doi:10.1080/17511320802223824
  • DA COSTA, L.A. and T. OLIVEIRA. 2016. On the aesthetic potential of sports and physical education. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (4): 444–64. doi:10.1080/17511321.2016.1210209
  • DEVÍS, J. 2008. El juego en el currículum de la EF: Aproximación crítica (o el reino de lo posible en la postmodernidad. Revista EF Y Deporte 27 (2): 79–89.
  • DUMAZEDIER, J. 1974. Sociology of leisure. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • GARCÍA-PUCHADES, W. and O. CHIVA-BARTOLL. 2018. El juego como proceso de subjetivación en educación física y su justificación curricular. Cultura, Ciencia Y Deporte 38 (13): 147–56.
  • GRATTON, P. 2014. Speculative realism. problems and prospects. London: Bloomsbury.
  • HARMAN, G. 2002. Tool-being. Chicago: Open Court.
  • HARMAN, G. 2011. The quadruple object. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
  • HARMAN, G. 2012. Weird realism: Lovecraft and philosophy. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
  • HARMAN, G. 2018. Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. London: Penguin Books.
  • HEIN, H. 1968. Play as an aesthetic concept. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1): 67–71. doi:10.2307/428530
  • HIRST, P.H. 1974. Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • HIRST, P.H. and R.S. PETERS. 1970. The logic of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • HUANG, Y. and E. RYALL. 2018. On the relationship between philosophy and game-playing. In The philosophy of play as life, edited by W. Russell, E. Ryall, and M. MacLean. London: Routledge: 80–93.
  • HURKA, T. 2006. Games and the good. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1): 217–35. doi:10.1111/j.0066-7373.2006.00132.x
  • HYLAND, D.A. 1980. The stance of play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 7: 87–99. doi:10.1080/00948705.1980.9714370
  • KANT, I. 1998. Critique of pure reason. Translated by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University-Press.
  • KOBIELA, F. 2016. The goal triad in games. A conceptual map and case studies. Recerca, Revista De Pensament I Anàlisi 18: 13–27. doi:10.6035/Recerca
  • KRETCHMAR, R.S. 1997. Philosophy of sport. In The history of exercise and sport science, edited by J.D. Masssengale and R. Seanson. United States of America: Human Kinetics: 181–203.
  • KRETCHMAR, R.S. 2006. The intelligibility of suits’s utopia: The view from anthropological philosophy’. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 33 (1): 67–77. doi:10.1080/00948705.2006.9714691
  • KRETCHMAR, R.S. 2008. Gaming up life: Considerations for game expansions. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (2): 142–55. doi:10.1080/00948705.2008.9714735
  • LAWSON, H.A. 1984. Invitation to physical education. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • LOLAND, S. 2002. Fair play in sport: A moral norm system. London: Routledge.
  • MALABY, T.M. 2007. Beyond play: A new approach to games. Games and Culture 2 (2): 95–113. doi:10.1177/1555412007299434
  • MALABY, T.M. 2009. Anthropology and play: The contours of playful experience. New Literary History 40 (1): 205–18. doi:10.1353/nlh.0.0079
  • MCBRIDE, F. 1979. A critique of Mr. Suits’ definition of game playing. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 4: 59–65. doi:10.1080/00948705.1979.10654151
  • MCINTOSH, P.C. 1979. Fair Play: Ethics in sport and education. London: Heineman.
  • MCLAUGHLIN, D.W. and R.S. KRETCHMAR 2008. Reinventing the wheel: on games and the good life. Doctoral thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
  • MCNAMEE, M. 2008. Sports, virtues and vices: Morality plays. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • MEIER, K.V. 1988. Triad trickery: Playing with sport and games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15: 11–30. doi:10.1080/00948705.1988.9714458
  • MORGAN, W.J. 2015. On suits on the moral normativity of games. Unpublished manuscript presented in Games, Play, and Sports: After Suits, University of Toronto. Available at: https://www.humanities.utoronto.ca/uploaded_files/content/1630/file/Morgan_On_Suits_on_Normativity_of_Games.pdf (accessed 20 July 2018)
  • PETERS, R.S. 1966. Ethics and education. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • RUSSELL, J.S. 2007. Broad internalism and the moral foundations of sport. In Ethics in sport, edited by W. Morgan. Champaign: Human Kinetics: 51–66.
  • SALEN, K. and E. ZIMMERMAN. 2003. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • SCHMID, S.E. 2011. Beyond autotelic play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (2): 149–66. doi:10.1080/00948705.2011.10510418
  • SIMON, R.L. 2007. Internalism and internal values in sport. In Ethics in sport, edited by W. Morgan. Champaign: Human Kinetics: 35–50.
  • SIMON, R.L. 2015. Internalism and sport. In Handbook of the philosophy of sport, edited by M. McNamee and W.J. Morgan. New York: Routledge: 22–34.
  • STOLZ, S.A. 2013. Phenomenology and physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (9): 949–62. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.785355
  • STOLZ, S.A. 2014. The philosophy of physical education: A new perspective. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis.
  • SUITS, B. 1978. The grasshopper. Games, life and utopia. Toronto, Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
  • SUITS, B. 1984. Games and utopia posthumous reflections. Simulation & Gaming 15 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1177/0037550084151002
  • SUITS, B. 2012. Tricky triad: Games, play, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1080/00948705.1988.9714457
  • SUITS, B. 2013. Words on play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 4 (1): 117–31. doi:10.1080/00948705.1977.10654132
  • THOMPSON, K. 2004. Sport and utopia. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (1): 60–63. doi:10.1080/00948705.2004.9714649
  • WOLFENDALE, P. 2014. Object-oriented philosophy. The noumenon’s new clothes. Windsor Quarry: Urbanomic-Media-Ltd.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.